skip to main content
10.1145/1502650.1502656acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

User-oriented document summarization through vision-based eye-tracking

Authors Info & Claims
Published:08 February 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

We propose a new document summarization algorithm which is personalized. The key idea is to rely on the attention (reading) time of individual users spent on single words in a document as the essential clue. The prediction of user attention over every word in a document is based on the user's attention during his previous reads, which is acquired via a vision-based commodity eye-tracking mechanism. Once the user's attentions over a small collection of words are known, our algorithm can predict the user's attention over every word in the document through word semantics analysis. Our algorithm then summarizes the document according to user attention on every individual word in the document. With our algorithm, we have developed a document summarization prototype system. Experiment results produced by our algorithm are compared with the ones manually summarized by users as well as by commercial summarization software, which clearly demonstrates the advantages of our new algorithm for user-oriented document summarization.

References

  1. Bibliography summarization papers. http://www.summarization.com/summ.pdf, last updated on October 20, 2008. last visited on December 11, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. R. A. Baeza-Yates and B. Ribeiro-Neto. Modern Information Retrieval. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, USA, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. A. Bulling, J. A.Ward, H. Gellersen, and G. Tröster. Robust recognition of reading activity in transit using wearable electrooculography. In Pervasive '08: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Pervasive Computing, pages 19--37, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. A. Bulling, D. Roggen, and G. Tröster. It's in your eyes: towards context-awareness and mobile HCI using wearable EOG Goggles. In UbiComp '08: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, pages 84--93, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. E. H. Chi, M. Gumbrecht, and L. Hong. Visual foraging of highlighted text: An eye-tracking study. In HCII '07: Proceedings of HCI International Conference, pages 589--598, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. The New York Times Company. The New York Times, http://www.nytimes.com/, last visited on December 11, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. T. Darrell, N. Checka, A. Oh, and L. Morency. Exploring vision-based interfaces: How to use your head in dual pointing tasks. MIT AI Memo 2002-001, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Z. Dou, R. Song, and J.-R. Wen. A large-scale evaluation and analysis of personalized search strategies. In WWW '07: Proceedings of International Conference on World Wide Web, pages 581--590, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. G. Dupret, V. Murdock, and B. Piwowarski. Web search engine evaluation using clickthrough data and a user model. In WWW '07: Proceedings of International Conference on World Wide Web, Banff, Canada, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. G. Erkan and D. Radev. Lexrank: Graph-based lexical centrality as salience in text summarization. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research (JAIR), 22:457--479, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. American Association for the Advancement of Science. Science magazine, http://www.sciencemag.com/, last visited on December 11, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. S. Fox, K. Karnawat, M. Mydland, S. Dumais, and T. White. Evaluating implicit measures to improve web search. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 23(2):147--168, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. X. Fu. Evaluating sources of implicit feedback in web searches. In RecSys '07: Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Conference on Recommender Systems, pages 191--194, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Y. Gong and X. Liu. Generic text summarization using relevance measure and latent semantic analysis. In SIGIR '01: Proceedings of the 24th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 19--25, New York, NY, USA, 2001. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. D. Gorodnichy. Perceptual cursor-a solution to the broken loop problem in vision-based hands-free computer control devices. National Research Council Canada Publication, NRC-48472:1--23, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. L. A. Granka, T. Joachims, and G. Gay. Eye-tracking analysis of user behavior in www search. In SIGIR '04: Proceedings of the 27th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 478--479, New York, NY, USA, 2004. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Z. Guan and E. Cutrell. An eye tracking study of the effect of target rank on web search. In CHI '07: Proceedings of SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 417--420, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. W. S. A. Halabi, M. Kubat, and M. Tapia. Time spent on a web page is sufficient to infer a user's interest. In IMSA '07: Proceedings of IASTED European Conference, pages 41--46, Anaheim, CA, USA, 2007. ACTA Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. 19. C.-K. Huang, Y.-J. Oyang, and L.-F. Chien. A contextual term suggestion mechanism for interactive web search. In WI '01: Proceedings of Asia-Pacific Conference on Web Intelligence: Research and Development, pages 272--281, London, UK, 2001. Springer-Verlag. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. T. Joachims. A probabilistic analysis of the rocchio algorithm with tfidf for text categorization. In ICML '97: Proceedings of International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 143--151, San Francisco, CA, USA, 1997. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. T. Joachims. Optimizing search engines using clickthrough data. In KDD '02: Proceedings of ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pages 133--142, New York, NY, USA, 2002. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. T. Joachims, L. Granka, B. Pan, H. Hembrooke, and G. Gay. Accurately interpreting clickthrough data as implicit feedback. In SIGIR '05: Proceedings of the 28th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 154--161, New York, NY, USA, 2005. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. K. S. Jones. What might be in a summary. In Information Retrieval 93: Von der Modellierung zur Anwendung, pages 9--26, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. D. Kelly and N. J. Belkin. Reading time, scrolling and interaction: exploring implicit sources of user preferences for relevance feedback. In SIGIR '01 Proceedings of the 24th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 408--409, New York, NY, USA, 2001. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. D. Kelly and N. J. Belkin. Display time as implicit feedback: understanding task effects. In SIGIR '04: Proceedings of the 27th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 377--384, New York, NY, USA, 2004. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. K.-N. Kim and R. Ramakrishna. Vision-based eye-gaze tracking for human computer interface. SMC '99: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 2:324--329, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Y. Li, Z. A. Bandar, and D. Mclean. An approach for measuring semantic similarity between words using multiple information sources. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 15(4):871--882, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. C.-Y. Lin. Training a selection function for extraction. In CIKM '99: Proceedings of the 8th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pages 55--62, New York, NY, USA, 1999. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Y.-P. Lin, Y.-P. Chao, C.-C. Lin, and J.-H. Chen. Webcam mouse using face and eye tracking in various illumination environments. EMBS '05: Proceedings of 27th IEEE Annual International Conference of Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, pages 3738--3741, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. F. Liu, C. Yu, and W. Meng. Personalized web search by mapping user queries to categories. In CIKM '02: Proceedings of the 11th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pages 558--565, New York, NY, USA, 2002. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Y. Lv, L. Sun, J. Zhang, J.-Y. Nie, W. Chen, and W. Zhang. An iterative implicit feedback approach to personalized search. In ACL '06: Proceedings of International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pages 585--592, Morristown, NJ, USA, 2006. Association for Computational Linguistics. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. I. Mani. Advances in Automatic Text Summarization. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Microsoft. Word (software), http://office.microsoft.com/word/, Microsoft Corporation, last visited on December 11, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. J. Pitkow, H. Sch¨utze, T. Cass, R. Cooley, D. Turnbull, A. Edmonds, E. Adar, and T. Breuel. Personalized search. Communications of the ACM, 45(9):50--55, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. D. Radev, T. Allison, S. Blair-Goldensohn, J. Blitzer, A. C¸ elebi, S. Dimitrov, E. Drabek, A. Hakim, W. Lam, D. Liu, J. Otterbacher, H. Qi, H. Saggion, S. Teufel, M. Topper, A. Winkel, and Z. Zhang. MEAD--A platform for multidocument multilingual text summarization. In LREC '04: The 2nd International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, Lisbon, Portugal, May 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. F. Radlinski and T. Joachims. Query chains: learning to rank from implicit feedback. In KDD '05: Proceedings of ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery in Data Mining, pages 239--248, New York, NY, USA, 2005. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. R. W. Reeder, P. Pirolli, and S. K. Card. Webeyemapper and weblogger: tools for analyzing eye tracking data collected in web-use studies. In CHI '01: CHI '01 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 19--20, New York, NY, USA, 2001. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. R. Ruddarraju, A. Haro, K. Nagel, Q. T. Tran, I. A. Essa, G. Abowd, and E. D. Mynatt. Perceptual user interfaces using vision-based eye tracking. In ICMI '03: Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces, pages 227--233, New York, NY, USA, 2003. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. G. Salton and C. Buckley. Improving retrieval performance by relevance feedback. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(4):288--297, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. M. Speretta and S. Gauch. Personalized search based on user search histories. In WI '05: Proceedings of IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence, pages 622--628, Washington, DC, USA, 2005. IEEE Computer Society. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. M.-C. Su, S.-Y. Su, and G.-D. Chen. A low-cost vision-based human-computer interface for people with severe disabilities. Biomedical Engineering Applications, Basis, and Communications, 17:284--292, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. R. White, J. M. Jose, and I. Ruthven. Comparing explicit and implicit feedback techniques for web retrieval: Trec-10 interactive track report. In TREC 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. R. White, I. Ruthven, and J. M. Jose. The use of implicit evidence for relevance feedback in web retrieval. In Proceedings of BCS-IRSG European Colloquium on IR Research, pages 93--109, London, UK, 2002. Springer-Verlag. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. S. Xu, H. Jiang, and F. C. Lau. Personalized online document, image and video recommendation via commodity eye-tracking. In RecSys '08: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM International Conference on Recommender Systems, pages 83--90, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. S. Xu, Y. Zhu, H. Jiang, and F. C. M. Lau. A user-oriented webpage ranking algorithm based on user attention time. In AAAI '08: Proceedings of the 23rd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 1255--1260, 2008, AAAI Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. J.-Y. Yeh, H.-R. Ke, W.-P. Yang, and I.-H. Meng. Text summarization using a trainable summarizer and latent semantic analysis. Information Processing and Management, 41(1):75--95, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. P. Zielinski. Opengazer: open-source gaze tracker for ordinary webcams (software), Samsung and The Gatsby Charitable Foundation. http://www.inference.phy.cam.ac.uk/opengazer/, last visited on December 11 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. User-oriented document summarization through vision-based eye-tracking

                  Recommendations

                  Comments

                  Login options

                  Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                  Sign in
                  • Published in

                    cover image ACM Conferences
                    IUI '09: Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces
                    February 2009
                    522 pages
                    ISBN:9781605581682
                    DOI:10.1145/1502650

                    Copyright © 2009 ACM

                    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                    Publisher

                    Association for Computing Machinery

                    New York, NY, United States

                    Publication History

                    • Published: 8 February 2009

                    Permissions

                    Request permissions about this article.

                    Request Permissions

                    Check for updates

                    Qualifiers

                    • research-article

                    Acceptance Rates

                    Overall Acceptance Rate746of2,811submissions,27%

                  PDF Format

                  View or Download as a PDF file.

                  PDF

                  eReader

                  View online with eReader.

                  eReader