skip to main content
10.1145/1409944.1409981acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobicomConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Modulation rate adaptation in urban and vehicular environments: cross-layer implementation and experimental evaluation

Published:14 September 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

Accurately selecting modulation rates for time-varying channel conditions is critical for avoiding performance degradations due to rate overselection when channel conditions degrade or underselection when channel conditions improve. In this paper, we design a custom cross-layer framework that enables (i) implementation of multiple and previously unimplemented rate adaptation mechanisms, (ii) experimental evaluation and comparison of rate adaptation protocols on controlled, repeatable channels as well as residential urban and downtown vehicular and non-mobile environments in which we accurately measure channel conditions with 100-μs granularity, and (iii) comparison of performance on a per-packet basis with the ideal modulation rate obtained via exhaustive experimental search. Our evaluation reveals that SNR-triggered protocols are susceptible to overselection from the ideal rate when the coherence time is low (a scenario that we show occurs in practice even in a nonmobile topology), and that "in-situ" training can produce large gains to overcome this sensitivity. Another key finding is that a mechanism effective in differentiating between collision and fading losses for hidden terminals has severely imbalanced throughput sharing when competing links are even slightly heterogeneous. In general, we find trained SNR-based protocols outperform loss-based protocols in terms of the ability to track vehicular clients, accuracy within outdoor environments, and balanced sharing with heterogeneous links (even with physical layer capture).

References

  1. Technical report on RF channel characterization and system deployment modeling. Technical Report JTC(AIR)/94.09.23-065R6, JTC (Air) Standards Contribution, September 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. MadWifi Project. http://madwifi.org, September 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. D Aguayo, J. Bicket, S. Biswas, G. Judd, and R. Morris. Link-level measurements from an 802.11 mesh network. In ACM SIGCOMM, Portland, OR, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. J. C. Bicket. Bit-rate selection in wireless networks. M.S. Thesis, MIT, February 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. J. Camp, V. Mancuso, O. Gurewitz, and E. Knightly. A measurement study of multiplicative overhead effects in wireless networks. In IEEE INFOCOM, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. J. Camp, J. Robinson, C. Steger, and E. Knightly. Measurement driven deployment of a two-tier urban mesh access network. In ACM MobiSys, Uppsala, Sweden, June 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. P. Chevillat, J. Jelitto, A. Noll Barreto, and H. L. Truong. A dynamic link adaptation algorithm for IEEE 802.11a wireless LANs. In IEEE International Conference on Communications, Anchorage, Alaska, May 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. M. Heusse, F. Rousseau, G. Berger-Sabbatel, and A. Duda. Performance anomaly of 802.11b. In IEEE INFOCOM, San Francisco, CA, April 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. G. Holland, N. Vaidya, and P. Bahl. A rate-adaptive MAC protocol for multi-hop wireless networks. In ACM MobiCom, Rome, Italy, July 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. G. Judd, X. Wang, and P. Steenkiste. Efficient channel-aware rate adaptation in dynamic environments. In ACM MobiSys, Boulder, Colorado, June 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. A. Kamerman and L. Monteban. WaveLAN II: A high-performance wireless LAN for the unlicensed band. Bell Labs Technical Journal, pages 118--133, Summer 1997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. A. Khattab, J. Camp, C. Hunter, P. Murphy, A. Sabharwal, and E. Knightly. WARP: A flexible platform for clean-slate wireless medium access protocol design. SIGMOBILE Mob. Comput. Commun. Rev., 12(1):56--58, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. J. Kim, S. Kim, S. Choi, and D. Qiao. CARA: Collision-aware rate adaptation for IEEE 802.11 WLANs. In IEEE INFOCOM, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. A. Kochut, A. Vasan, A. U. Shankar, and A. Agrawala. Sniffing out the correct physical layer capture model in 802.11b. In IEEE ICNP, Berlin, Germany, October 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. M. Lacage, M. Hossein, and T. Turletti. IEEE 802.11 rate adaptation: A practical approach. In MSWiM, October 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. K. Mandke, S.-H. Choi, G. Kim, R. Grant, R. Daniels, W. Kim, R. Heath, and S. Nettles. Early results on Hydra: A flexible MAC/PHY multihop testbed. In IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, Dublin, Ireland, April 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. B. Sadeghi, V. Kanodia, A. Sabharwal, and E. Knightly. Opportunistic media access for multirate ad hoc networks. In ACM MobiCom, Atlanta, GA, September 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. S. Wong, S. Lu, H. Yang, and V. Bharghavan. Robust rate adaptation for 802.11 wireless networks. In ACM MobiCom, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Modulation rate adaptation in urban and vehicular environments: cross-layer implementation and experimental evaluation

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        MobiCom '08: Proceedings of the 14th ACM international conference on Mobile computing and networking
        September 2008
        374 pages
        ISBN:9781605580968
        DOI:10.1145/1409944

        Copyright © 2008 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 14 September 2008

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate440of2,972submissions,15%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader