skip to main content
10.1145/1240624.1240801acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Effects of presenting geographic context on tracking activity between cameras

Published:29 April 2007Publication History

ABSTRACT

A common video surveillance task is to keep track of people moving around the space being monitored. It is often difficult to track activity between cameras because locations such as hallways in office buildings can look quite similar and do not indicate the spatial proximity of the cameras. We describe a spatial video player that orients nearby video feeds with the field of view of the main playing video to aid in tracking between cameras. This is compared with the traditional bank of cameras with and without interactive maps for identifying and selecting cameras. We additionally explore the value of static and rotating maps for tracking activity between cameras. The study results show that both the spatial video player and the map improve user performance when compared to the camera-bank interface. Also, subjects change cameras more often with the spatial player than either the camera bank or the map, when available.

References

  1. 3VR Security. http://www.3vr.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. F. Arman, R. Depommier, A. Hsu, M.-Y. Chiu, Content-based browsing of video sequences. In Proc. ACM Multimedia 94, San Francisco, CA, pp. 97--103, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. E. Ardizzone, M. La Cascia, G. Lo Re, and M. Ortolani. An integrated architecture for surveillance and monitoring in an archaeological site. Proc. ACM Workshop on Video Surveillance and Sensor Networks, pp. 79--86, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. P.K. Atrey, M.S. Kankanhalli, and R. Jain. Timeline-based information assimilation in multimedia surveillance and monitoring systems. Proc. ACM Workshop on Video Surveillance and Sensor Networks, pp. 103--112, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Axis Communications. http://www.axis.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. R. Cucchiara. Multimedia surveillance systems. Proc. ACM Workshop on Video Surveillance and Sensor Networks, pp. 3--10, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. G. Daniel and M. Chen. Video Visualization. Proc. IEEE Visualization 2003, pp. 409--416, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Energy Control, Inc. http://energyctrl.com/security.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. J.P. Freeman, B. McChesney, M. Denari, and S. Thompson. The explosion in intelligent video, International Security Conference West, 2006. http://www.iscwest.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Guardian Solutions. http://www.guardiansolutions.com/about.aspGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. L. Huston, R. Sukthankar, J. Campbell, and P. Pillai. Forensic video reconstruction. Proc. ACM Workshop on Video Surveillance and Sensor Networks, pp. 20--28, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. G. Iannizzotto, C. Costanzo, F. La Rosa, and P. Lanzafame. A multimodal perceptual user interface for video-surveillance environments. Proc. Conference on Multimodal Interfaces, pp. 45--52, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Johnson Controls. http://www.johnsoncontrols.com/security/Default.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. P. Korshunov and W.T. Ooi. Critical video quality for distributed automated video surveillance. Proc. ACM Multimedia, pp. 151--160, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. L3 Communications. http://www.l3praetorian.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Mechanical and Spatial Aptitude, LearningExpress, LLC:NY, 2001. http://booklearning.tripod.com/Mechanical_and_Spatial_.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. ObjectVideo. http://www.objectvideo.com/products/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. P. Pillai, Y. Ke, and J. Campbell. Multi-fidelity storage. Proc. ACM Workshop on Video Surveillance and Sensor Networks, pp. 72--79, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. I.O. Sebe, J. Hu, S. You, and U. Neumann. 3D video surveillance with augmented virtual environments. Proc. ACM Workshop on Video Surveillance and Sensor Networks, pp. 107--112, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Vidient. http://www.vidient.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. VistaScape Security System. http://www.vistascape.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. G. Wang, T.-T. Wong, and P.-A. Heng. Real-time surveillance video display with salience. Proc. ACM Workshop on Video Surveillance and Sensor Networks, pp. 37--44, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. J. Wang, M.S. Kankanhalli, W. Yan, and R. Jain. Experiential sampling for video surveillance. Proc. ACM Workshop on Video Surveillance and Sensor Networks, pp. 77--86, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. G. Wu, Y. Wu, L. Jiao, Y.-F. Wang, and E.Y. Chang. Multi-camera spatio-temporal fusion and biased sequence-data learning for security surveillance. Proc. ACM Multimedia, pp. 528--538, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Effects of presenting geographic context on tracking activity between cameras

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Conferences
              CHI '07: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
              April 2007
              1654 pages
              ISBN:9781595935939
              DOI:10.1145/1240624

              Copyright © 2007 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 29 April 2007

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • Article

              Acceptance Rates

              CHI '07 Paper Acceptance Rate182of840submissions,22%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader