skip to main content
10.1145/1152215.1152260acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobilehciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Target size study for one-handed thumb use on small touchscreen devices

Published:12 September 2006Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper describes a two-phase study conducted to determine optimal target sizes for one-handed thumb use of mobile handheld devices equipped with a touch-sensitive screen. Similar studies have provided recommendations for target sizes when using a mobile device with two hands plus a stylus, and interacting with a desktop-sized display with an index finger, but never for thumbs when holding a small device in a single hand. The first phase explored the required target size for single-target (discrete) pointing tasks, such as activating buttons, radio buttons or checkboxes. The second phase investigated optimal sizes for widgets used for tasks that involve a sequence of taps (serial), such as text entry. Since holding a device in one hand constrains thumb movement, we varied target positions to determine if performance depended on screen location. The results showed that while speed generally improved as targets grew, there were no significant differences in error rate between target sizes =9.6 mm in discrete tasks and targets =7.7 mm in serial tasks. Along with subjective ratings and the findings on hit response variability, we found that target size of 9.2 mm for discrete tasks and targets of 9.6 mm for serial tasks should be sufficiently large for one-handed thumb use on touchscreen-based handhelds without degrading performance and preference.

References

  1. Bederson, B. B., Grosjean, J. and Meyer, J. Toolkit Design for Interactive Structured Graphics. IEEE Trans. Soft-Eng., 30, 8 (2004), 535--546. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Brewster, S. A. Overcoming the lack of screen space on mobile computers. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 6, 3 (2002), 188--205. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Colle, H. A. and Hiszem, K. J. Standing at a kiosk: effects of key size and spacing on touch screen numeric keypad performance and user experience. Ergonomics, 47, 13 (2004), 1406--1423.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Fitts, P. M. The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47 (1954), 381--391.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Himberg, J., Häkkilä, J., Kangas, P. and Mäntyjärvi, J. On-line personalization of a touchscreen based keyboard. Proc. IUI 2003, ACM Press (2003), 77--84. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Karlson, A. K., Bederson, B. B. and Contreras-Vidal, J. L. Studies in One-Handed Mobile Design: Habit, Desire and Agility. Tech report HCIL-2006-02, Computer Science Dept, University of Maryland, College Park, MD (2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Karlson, A. K., Bederson, B. B. and SanGiovanni, J. AppLens and LaunchTile: two designs for one-handed thumb use on small devices. Proc. CHI 2005, ACM Press (2005), 201--210. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. MacKenzie, I. S. A note on the information-theoretic basis for Fitts' law. Journal of Motor Behavior, 21 (1989), 323--330.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. MacKenzie, I. S. and Zhang, S. X. An empirical investigation of the novice experience with soft keyboards. Behaviour & Information Technology, 20, 6 (2001), 411--418.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Mizobuchi, S., Chignell, M. and Newton, D. Mobile text entry: relationship between walking speed and text input task difficulty. MobileHCI 2005, ACM press (2005), 122--128. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Mizobuchi, S., Mori, K., Ren, X. and Yasumura, M. An empirical study of the minimum required size and the number of targets for pen on the small display. Proc. MobileHCI 2002, Springer-Verlag (2002), 184--194. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Nesbat, S. B. A system for fast, full-text entry for small electronic devices. Proc. ICMI 2003, ACM Press (2003), 4--11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Pascoe, J., Ryan, N. and Mores, D. Using while moving: HCI issues in fieldwork environment. Trans. on Computer-Human Interaction, 7, 3 (2000). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Piccolo.NET. www.cs.umd.edu/hcil/piccolo/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Potter, R. L., Weldon, L. J. and Shneiderman, B. Improving the accuracy of touch screens: an experimental evaluation of three strategies. Proc. CHI (1988), 27--32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Sears, A., Revis, D., Swatski, J., Crittenden, R. and Schneiderman, B. Investigating touchscreen typing: the effect of keyboard size on typing speed. Behaviour & Information Technology, 12, (1993), 17--22.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Sears, A. and Shneiderman, B. High-precision touchscreens: design strategies and comparisons with a mouse. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 34, 4 (1991), 593--613. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Sears, A. and Zha, Y. Data entry for mobile devices using soft keyboards: understanding the effects of keyboard size and user tasks. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 16, 2 (2003), 163--184.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Target size study for one-handed thumb use on small touchscreen devices

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      MobileHCI '06: Proceedings of the 8th conference on Human-computer interaction with mobile devices and services
      September 2006
      320 pages
      ISBN:1595933905
      DOI:10.1145/1152215

      Copyright © 2006 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 12 September 2006

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate202of906submissions,22%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader