skip to main content
10.1145/1148170.1148193acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Semantic term matching in axiomatic approaches to information retrieval

Published:06 August 2006Publication History

ABSTRACT

A common limitation of many retrieval models, including the recently proposed axiomatic approaches, is that retrieval scores are solely based on exact (i.e., syntactic) matching of terms in the queries and documents, without allowing distinct but semantically related terms to match each other and contribute to the retrieval score. In this paper, we show that semantic term matching can be naturally incorporated into the axiomatic retrieval model through defining the primitive weighting function based on a semantic similarity function of terms. We define several desirable retrieval constraints for semantic term matching and use such constraints to extend the axiomatic model to directly support semantic term matching based on the mutual information of terms computed on some document set. We show that such extension can be efficiently implemented as query expansion. Experiment results on several representative data sets show that, with mutual information computed over the documents in either the target collection for retrieval or an external collection such as the Web, our semantic expansion consistently and substantially improves retrieval accuracy over the baseline axiomatic retrieval model. As a pseudo feedback method, our method also outperforms a state-of-the-art language modeling feedback method.

References

  1. M. Adriani. Using statistical term similarity for sense disambiguation in cross-language information retrieval. Information Retrieval 2:69--80,2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. J. Bai, D. Song, P. Bruza, J.-Y. Nie, and G. Cao. Query expansion using term relationships in language models for information retrieval. In Fourteenth International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM 2005), 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. A. Berger and J. Lafferty. Information retrieval as statistical translation. In Proceedings of the 1999 ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval pages 222--229,1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. G. Cao, J.-Y. Nie, and J. Bai. Integrating word relationships into language models. In Proceedings of the 2005 ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. H. Fang, T. Tao, and C. Zhai. A formal study of information retrieval heuristics. In Proceedings of the 2004 ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. H. Fang and C. Zhai. An exploration of axiomatic approaches to information retrieval. In Proceedings of the 2005 ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. J. Gao, J.-Y. Nie, H. He, W. Chen, and M. Zhou. Resolving query translation ambiguity using decaying co-occurrence model and syntactic dependence relations. In Proceedings of the 2002 ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. J. Gao, J.-Y. Nie, E. Xun, J. Zhang, M. Zhou, and C. Huang. Improving query translation for cross-language information retrieval using statistical models. In Proceedings of the 2001 ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. M.-G. Jng, S. H. Myeng, and S. Y. Park. Usingmutul information to resolve query translation ambiguities nd query term weighting. In Proceedings of the 37th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Y. Jing and W. B. Croft. An association thesaurus for information retreival. In Proceedings of RIAO 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. M. Lesk. Word-word associations in document retrieval systems. American Documentation 20:27--38, 1969.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. S. Liu, F. Liu, C. Yu, and W. Meng. An effective approach to document retrieval via utilizing wordnet and recognizing phrases. In Proceedings of the 2004 ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. A. Maeda, F. Sadat, M. Yoshikawa, and S. Uemura. Query term disambigu tion for web cross-language information retrieval using search engine. In Proceedings of the fifth international workshop on information retrieval with Asian languages 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. R. Mandala, T. Tokunaga, H. Tanaka, A. Okumura, and K. Satoh. Ad hoc retrieval experiments using wordnet and automatically constructed thesauri.In Proceedings of the Seventh Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-7), pages 475--481, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. M. E. Maron and J. L. Kuhns. On relevance, probabilistic indexing and information retrieval. Journal of the ACM 7, 1960. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. M. Mitra, A. Singhal, and C. Buckley. Improving automatic query expansion. In Proceedings of the 1998 ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. D. Moldovan and A. Novischi. Lexical chains for question answering. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Computational linguistics 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. H. J. Peat and P. Willett. The limitations of term co-occurence data for query expansion in document retrieval systems. Journal of the american society for information science 42(5): 378--383, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. J. Ponte nd W. B. Croft. A language modeling pproach to information retrieval. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGIR'98 pages 275--281, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Y. Qiu and H. Frei. Concept based query expansion. In Proceedings of the 1993 ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. J. Rocchio. Relevance feedback in information retrieval. In The SMART Retrieval System: Experiments in Automatic Document Processing pages 313--323. Prentice-Hall Inc., 1971.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. G. Salton and M. McGill. Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval McGraw-Hill, 1983. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. H. Schutze and J. O. Pedersen. A co-occurrence based thesaurus and two applications to information retrieval. Information Processing and Management 33(3): 307--318, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. A. F. Smeaton and C. J. van Rijsbergen. The retrieval effects of query expansion on feedback document retrieval system. The Computer Journal 26(3): 239--246, 1983.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. C. J. Van Rijsbergen. Information Retrieval Butterworths, 1979. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. E. M. Voorhees. Query expansion using lexical-semantic relations. In Proceedings of the 1994 ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. E. M. Voorhees. Overview of the trec 2004 robust retrieval track. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC2004), 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. E. M. Voorhees. Overview of the trec 2005 robust retrieval track. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC2005), 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. J. Xu and W. B. Croft. Query expansion using local and global document analysis. In Proceedings of the 1996 ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. C. Zhai and J. Lafferty. Model-based feedback in the KL-divergence retrieval model. In Tenth International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM 2001), pages 403--410,2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. C. Zhai and J. Lafferty. A study of smoothing methods for language models applied to ad hoc information retrieval. In Proceedings of SIGIR'01 pages 334--342, Sept 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Semantic term matching in axiomatic approaches to information retrieval

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGIR '06: Proceedings of the 29th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval
      August 2006
      768 pages
      ISBN:1595933697
      DOI:10.1145/1148170

      Copyright © 2006 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 6 August 2006

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate792of3,983submissions,20%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader