skip to main content
10.1145/1141753.1141804acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesjcdlConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Metadata aggregation and "automated digital libraries": a retrospective on the NSDL experience

Published:11 June 2006Publication History

ABSTRACT

Over three years ago, the Core Integration team of the National Science Digital Library (NSDL) implemented a digital library based on metadata aggregation using Dublin Core and OAI-PMH. The initial expectation was that such low-barrier technologies would be relatively easy to automate and administer. While this architectural choice permitted rapid deployment of a production NSDL, our three years of experience have contradicted our original expectations of easy automation and low people cost. We have learned that alleged "low-barrier" standards are often harder to deploy than expected. In this paper we report on this experience and comment on the general cost, the functionality, and the ultimate effectiveness of this architecture.

References

  1. Arms, C., Dushay, N., Foulonneau, M., et al., Best Practices for Shareable Metadata - DRAFT, http://comm.nsdl.org/download.php/653/ShareableMetadataBestPractices.docGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Arms, W.Y. Automated Digital Libraries: How Effectively Can Computers Be Used for the Skilled Tasks of Professional Librarianship? D-Lib Magazine, 6 (7/9).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Arms, W.Y., Dushay, N., Fulker, D.W., et al. A Case Study in Metadata Harvesting: the NSDL. Library Hi Tech, 21 (2).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Arms, W.Y., Hillmann, D., Lagoze, C., et al. A Spectrum of Interoperability: The Site for Science Prototype for the NSDL. D-Lib Magazine, 8 (1).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R. and Masinter, L. Uniform Resource Identifiers (URI): Generic Syntax. RFC, 2396, http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2396.txt. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Broder, A. On the resemblance and containment of documents Compression, Complexity of Sequences, Positano, Italy, 1997, 21--29. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Bruce, T.R. and Hillmann, D. The Continuum of Metadata Quality: Defining, Expressing, Exploiting. in Hillmann, D. ed. Metadata in Practice, American Library Association, Chicago, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Buchanan, G. and Hinze, A., A Generic Alerting Service for Digital Libraries. in JCDL 2005, (Tucson, AZ, 2005), ACM/IEEE, 131--140. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Cleverdon, C.W. and Keen, E.M. Factors Determining the Performance of Indexing Systems, Vol. 1: Design.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Cleverdon, C.W. and Keen, E.M. Factors Determining the Performance of Indexing Systems, Vol. 2: Test Results.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Cole, T.W. and Shreeves, S. Lessons Learned from the Illinois OAI Metadata Harvesting Project. in Hillmann, D. ed. Metadata in Practice, American Library Association, Chicago, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Dushay, N. and Hillmann, D., Analyzing Metadata for Effective Use and Re-Use. in DCMI Metadata Conference and Workshop, (Seattle, 2003). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Dushay, N. and Hillmann, D., NSDL Metadata Primer, http://metamanagement.comm.nsdl.org/outline.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Fisher, R., Lugg, R. and Boese, K.C. Cataloging: how to take a business approach. The Bottom Line: Managing Library Finances, 17 (2). 50--54.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Foulonneau, M., Cole, T.W., Habing, T.G., et al., Using Collection Descriptions to Enhance an Aggregation of Harvested Item-Level Metadata. in Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL 2005), (Denver, 2005), ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Hagedorn, K. OAIster: a "no dead ends" OAI service provider. Library Hi Tech, 21 (2). 170--181.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Halbert, M., Kaczmarek, J. and Hagedorn, K., Findings from the Mellon Metadata Harvesting Initiative. in Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries: 7th European Conference, ECDL 2003, (Trondheim, Norway, 2003), Springer-Verlag.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Harrison, T.L., Elango, A., Bollen, J., et al. Initial Experiences Re-exporting Duplicate and Similarity Computations with an OAI-PMH Aggregator. arXiv Report, cs.DL/0401001,Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Hillmann, D., Dushay, N. and Phipps, J., Improving Metadata Quality: Augmentation and Recombination. in DC-2004, (Shanghai, China, 2004). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Lagoze, C., Arms, W., Gan, S., et al., Core Services in the Architecture of the National Digital Library for Science Education (NSDL). in Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, (Portland, Oregon, 2002), ACM/IEEE. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Lagoze, C., Krafft, D., Jesuroga, S., et al. An Information Network Overlay Architecture for the NSDL. arXiv/CoRR Report, cs.DL/0501080, http://arxiv.org/abs/cs.DL/0501080.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Lagoze, C., Krafft, D.B., Payette, S., et al. What Is a Digital Library Anyway? Beyond Search and Access in the NSDL. D-Lib Magazine, 11 (11).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Lagoze, C., Van de Sompel, H., Nelson, M., et al., Guidelines for Aggregators, Caches and Proxies, http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/guidelines-aggregator.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Mason, J. and Sutton, S., Education Working Group: Draft Proposal, http://dublincore.org/documents/2000/10/05/education-namespace/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Mitchell, S., Mooney, M., Mason, J., et al. iVia Open Source Virtual Library System. D-Lib Magazine, 9 (1).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Saylor, J., NSDL COLLECTION DEVELOPMENT POLICY DRAFT v.030715, http://content.comm.nsdl.org/doc_tracker/docs_download.php?id=452Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Shreeves, S., Knutson, E.M., Stvilia, B., et al., Is "Quality" Metadata "Shareable" Metadata? The Implications of Local Metadata Practices for Federated Collections. in ACRL Twelfth National Conference, (Minneapolis, 2005), ALA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Warner, S. The OAI Data-Provider Registration and Validation Service. arXiv, cs.DL/0506010, http://arxiv.org/abs/cs.DL/0506010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Metadata aggregation and "automated digital libraries": a retrospective on the NSDL experience

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            JCDL '06: Proceedings of the 6th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries
            June 2006
            402 pages
            ISBN:1595933549
            DOI:10.1145/1141753

            Copyright © 2006 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 11 June 2006

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • Article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate415of1,482submissions,28%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader