skip to main content
10.1145/1133265.1133336acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaviConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Enabling interaction with single user applications through speech and gestures on a multi-user tabletop

Authors Info & Claims
Published:23 May 2006Publication History

ABSTRACT

Co-located collaborators often work over physical tabletops with rich geospatial information. Previous research shows that people use gestures and speech as they interact with artefacts on the table and communicate with one another. With the advent of large multi-touch surfaces, developers are now applying this knowledge to create appropriate technical innovations in digital table design. Yet they are limited by the difficulty of building a truly useful collaborative application from the ground up. In this paper, we circumvent this difficulty by: (a) building a multimodal speech and gesture engine around the Diamond Touch multi-user surface, and (b) wrapping existing, widely-used off-the-shelf single-user interactive spatial applications with a multimodal interface created from this engine. Through case studies of two quite different geospatial systems -- Google Earth and Warcraft III -- we show the new functionalities, feasibility and limitations of leveraging such single-user applications within a multi user, multimodal tabletop. This research informs the design of future multimodal tabletop applications that can exploit single-user software conveniently available in the market. We also contribute (1) a set of technical and behavioural affordances of multimodal interaction on a tabletop, and (2) lessons learnt from the limitations of single user applications.

References

  1. Bolt, R. A., Put-that-there: Voice and gesture at the graphics interface. Proc ACM Conf. Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques Seattle, 1980, 262--270.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Clark, H. Using language. Cambridge Univ. Press, 1996.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Cohen, P. Speech can't do everything: A case for multimodal systems. Speech Technology Magazine, 5(4), 2000.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Cohen, P. R., Coulston, R. and Krout, K., Multimodal interaction during multiparty dialogues: Initial results. Proc IEEE Int'l Conf. Multimodal Interfaces, 2002, 448--452.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Cohen, P. R., Johnston, M., McGee, D., Oviatt, S., Pittman, J., Smith, I., Chen, L. and Clow, J., QuickSet: Multimodal interaction for distributed applications. Proc. ACM Multimedia, 1997, 31--40.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Dietz, P. and Leigh, D. DiamondTouch: a multi-user touch technology. Proc ACM UIST, 2001, 219--226.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Dix, A., Finlay, J. Abowd, G. and Beale, R. Human-Computer Interaction. 2nd ed. Prentice Hall, 1998.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Greenberg, S. and Boyle, M. Customizable physical interfaces for interacting with conventional applications. Proc ACM UIST, 2002, 31--40.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Greenberg, S., Sharing views and interactions with single-user applications. Proc ACM COIS, 1990, 227--237]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Greenberg, S. Personalizable groupware: Accommodating individual roles and group differences. Proc ECSCW, 1991, 17--32,]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Gutwin, C., and Greenberg, S. The importance of awareness for team cognition in distributed collaboration. In E. Salas, S. Fiore (Eds) Team Cognition: Understanding the Factors that Drive Process and Performance, APA Press, 2004, 177--201.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Gutwin, C. and Greenberg, S. Design for individuals, design for groups: Tradeoffs between power and workspace awareness. Proc ACM CSCW, 1998, 207--216]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Heath, C. C. and Luff, P. Collaborative activity and technological design: Task coordination in London Underground control rooms. Proc ECSCW, 1991, 65--80]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Ishii, H., Kobayashi, M. and Grudin, J. Integration of interpersonal space and shared workspace: ClearBoard design and experiments. ACM TOIS, 11 (4), 1993, 349--375.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Kruger, R., Carpendale, M. S. T., Scott, S. and Greenberg, S. Roles of orientation in tabletop collaboration: Comprehension, coordination and communication. J CSCW, 13(5--6), 2004, 501--537.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. McGee, D. R. and Cohen, P. R., Creating tangible interfaces by augmenting physical objects with multimodal language. Proc ACM Conf Intelligent User Interfaces, 2001, 113--119.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Oviatt, S. L. Ten myths of multimodal interaction, Comm. ACM, 42(11), 1999, 74--81.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Oviatt, S. Multimodal interactive maps: Designing for human performance. Human-Computer Interaction 12, 1997.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Pinelle, D., Gutwin, C. and Greenberg, S. Task analysis for groupware usability evaluation: Modeling shared-workspace tasks with the mechanics of collaboration. ACM TOCHI, 10(4), 2003, 281--311.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Rekimoto, J. SmartSkin: An infrastructure for freehand manipulation on interactive surfaces. Proc ACM CHI, 2002.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Ringel-Morris, M., Ryall, K., Shen, C., Forlines, C., Vernier, F. Beyond social protocols: Multi-user coordination policies for co-located groupware. Proc ACM CSCW, 262--265, 2004.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Segal, L. Effects of checklist interface on non-verbal crew communications, NASA Ames Research Center, Contractor Report 177639, 1994]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Tang, J. Findings from observational studies of collaborative work. Int. J. Man-Machine. Studies. 34 (2), 1991, 143--160.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Wigdor, D., Balakrishnan, R. Empirical investigation into the effect of orientation on text readability in tabletop displays. Proc ECSCW, 2005.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Wu, M., Shen, C., Ryall, K., Forlines, C., and Balakrishnan, R. Gesture registration, relaxation, and reuse for multi-point direct-touch surfaces. IEEE Int'l Workshop Horizontal Interactive Human-Computer Systems (TableTop), 2006.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Wu, M. and Balakrishnan, R. Multi-finger and whole hand gestural interaction techniques for multi-user tabletop displays. Proc ACM UIST, 193--202, 2003.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Enabling interaction with single user applications through speech and gestures on a multi-user tabletop

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      AVI '06: Proceedings of the working conference on Advanced visual interfaces
      May 2006
      512 pages
      ISBN:1595933530
      DOI:10.1145/1133265
      • General Chair:
      • Augusto Celentano

      Copyright © 2006 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 23 May 2006

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate107of408submissions,26%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader