skip to main content
article

Guest column: inapproximability results via Long Code based PCPs

Published:01 June 2005Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Summer has come again. And what better way is there to spend a summer than to relax on a sandy beach, on a mountain top, or at a park's picnic tables, and... think theory! Summer is a particularly good time to attack the big questions whose openness just plain annoys you. In light of Reingold's L = SL result, does L-vs.-RL tempt you? If so, take it on! (But perhaps peek first at Reingold--Trevisan--Vadhan's ECCC TR05-022.) Are you convinced that UP = NP should imply the collapse of the polynomial hierarchy? Make it so! (But if you hope to do so via showing that UP is contained in the low hierarchy, peek first at Long--Sheu's 1996 MST article.) You know that S2 ⊆ SNP∩coNP2 ⊆ ZPPNP and SNP2 ⊆ ZPPNPNP, but believe that some of those "⊆"s are "=" s or are (gasp!) provably strict containments (thus giving some insight into whether recent improvements (Cai in FOCS 2001; Cai et al. in Information and Computation 2005) in the collapses of the polynomial hierarchy from assumptions that NP is in P/poly, (NP ∩ coNP)/poly, or coNP/poly are strict improvements)? Well, prove an "=" or find evidence for a strict containment... or to really make this a summer for us all to remember, prove a strict containment! Wishing you happy theorems.This article gives an overview of recent PCP constructions based on the Long Code and the inapproximability results implied by these constructions. We cover the inapproximability results for (1) MAX-3SAT and CLIQUE (2) Results for SPARSEST CUT, VERTEX COVER and MAX-CUT implied by the Unique Games Conjecture and (3) HYPERGRAPH VERTEX COVER and coloring problems on hypergraphs. The article aims at explaining the general framework that, loosely speaking, incorporates all the above results.

References

  1. M. Andrews and L. Zhang. Hardness of the undirected edge-disjoint paths problem. In Proc. 37th ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. M. Andrews and L. Zhang. Hardness of the undirected congestion minimization problem. In Proc. 37th ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. S. Arora. Probabilistic checking of proofs and the hardness of approximation problems. Ph.D. thesis, UC Berkeley, 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. S. Arora and C. Lund. The approximability of NP-hard problems. Chapter in Approximation Algorithms for NP-hard Problems, D. Hochbaum ed., PWS Publishing, Boston, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. S. Arora, L. Babai, J. Stern, and E. Z. Sweedyk. The hardness of approximate optima in lattices, codes and systems of linear equations. Journal of Computer and Systems Sciences (54), pp 317--331, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. S. Arora, C. Lund, R. Motawani, M. Sudan, and M. Szegedy. Proof verification and the hardness of approximation problems. Journal of the ACM, 45(3), pp 501--555, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. S. Arora and S. Safra. Probabilistic checking of proofs: A new characterization of NP. Journal of the ACM, 45(1), pp 70--122, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. M. Bellare, O. Goldreich, and M. Sudan. Free bits, PCPs, and nonapproximability-towards tight results. SIAM Journal of Computing, 27(3), pp 804--915, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. J. Bourgain. On the distribution of the Fourier speactrum of boolean functions. Israel J. of Math.: (131), pp 269--276, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. S. Chawla, R. Krauthgamer, R. Kumar, Y. Rabani, and D. Sivakumar. On the hardness of approximating Multicut and Sparsest Cut. In Proc. 20th IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. J. Chuzhoy and S. Naor. New hardness results for congestion minimization and machine scheduling. In Proc. 36th ACM symposium on Theory of computing, pp 28--34, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. I. Dinur, V. Guruswami, S. Khot, and O. Regev. A new multilayered PCP and the hardness of hypergraph vertex cover. In Proc. 35th ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pp 595--601, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. I. Dinur, O. Regev, and C. Smyth. The hardness of 3-uniform hypergraph coloring. In Proc. 43rd IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. I. Dinur and S. Safra. On the importance of being biased. In Proc. 34th ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pp 33--42, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. U. Feige. A threshold of ln n for approximating set cover. Journal of the ACM, 45(4), pp 634--652, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. U. Feige. Relations between average case complexity and approximation complexity. In Proc. 34th ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pp 534--543, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. U. Feige, S. Goldwasser, L. Lovász, S. Safra, and M. Szegedy. Interactive proofs and the hardness of approximating cliques. Journal of the ACM, 43(2), pp 268--292, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. U. Feige and D. Reichman. On systems of linear equations with two variables per equation. APPROXRANDOM, pp 117--127, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. E. Friedgut. Boolean functions with low average sensitivity depend on few coordinates. Combinatorica, 18(1), pp 27--35, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. M. Goemans and D. Williamson. Improved approximation algorithms for Maximum Cut and Satisfiability problems using semidefinite programming. Journal of the ACM, 42, pp 1115--1145, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. V. Guruswami, J. Håstad, and M. Sudan. Hardness of approximate hypergraph coloring. SIAM Journal of Computing, 31(6), pp 1663--1686, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. V. Guruswami and S. Khot. Hardness of Max 3SAT with no mixed clauses. In Proc. 20th IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. J. Hastad. Clique is hard to approximate within n1--ε. Acta Mathematica, Vol 182, pp 105--142, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. J. Hastad. Some optimal inapproximability results. Journal of the ACM, Vol. 48, pp 798--859, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. J. Hastad and A. Wigderson. Simple analysis of graph tests for linearity and PCP. Random Structures and Algorithms, Vol 22, no. 2, pp 139--160, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. J. Holmerin. Vertex cover on 4-regular hyper-graphs is hard to approximate within 2-ε. In Proc. 34th ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pp 544--552, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. J. Kahn, G. Kalai, and N. Linial. The influence of variables on boolean functions. In Proc. 29th IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pp 68--80, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. S. Khot. Ph.D. Thesis. Dept. of Computer Science, Princeton University, Tech. Report TR-673-03, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. S. Khot. On the power of unique 2-prover 1-round games. In Proc. 34th ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pp. 767--775, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. S. Khot. Ruling out PTAS for graph min-bisection, densest subgraph and bipartite clique. In Proc. 45th IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. S. Khot. Hardness results for coloring 3-colorable 3-uniform hypergraphs. In Proc. 43rd IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pp 23--32, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. S. Khot. Hardness of approximating the shortest vector problem in lattices. In Proc. 45th IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pp 126--135, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. S. Khot, G. Kindler, E. Mossel, and R. O'Donnell. Optimal inapproximability results for Max-Cut and other 2-variable CSPs? In Proc. 45th IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pp 146--154, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. S. Khot and O. Regev. Vertex cover might be hard to approximate to within 2 -- ε. In Proc. 18th IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity, pp 379--386, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. S. Khot and N. Vishnoi. The unique games conjecture, integrality gap for cut problems and embeddability of negative type metrics into l1. Preprint, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. E. Mossel, R. O'Donnell, and K. Oleszkiewicz. Noise stability of functions with low influences: invariance and optimality. Preprint, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. R. Raz. A parallel repetition theorem. SIAM Journal on Computing, 27(3), pp 763--803, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. L. Russo. An approximate zero-one law. Z. Wahrsch. Verw. Gebiete, 61(1), pp 129--139, 1982.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. A. Samorodnitsky and L. Trevisan. A PCP characterization of NP with optimal amortized query complexity. In Proc. 32nd ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pp 191--199, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. L. Trevisan. Inapproximability of combinatorial optimization problems. Survey paper, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. L. Trevisan. Approximation algorithms for unique games. Preprint, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. V. Vazirani. Approximation Algorithms. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Guest column: inapproximability results via Long Code based PCPs

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image ACM SIGACT News
          ACM SIGACT News  Volume 36, Issue 2
          June 2005
          101 pages
          ISSN:0163-5700
          DOI:10.1145/1067309
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 2005 Author

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 1 June 2005

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • article

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader