skip to main content
10.1145/1066129.1066140acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessplashConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

An Eclipse-based course project snapshot and submission system

Published:24 October 2004Publication History

ABSTRACT

Much research has been done on techniques to teach students how to program. However, it is usually difficult to quantify exactly how students work. Instructors typically only see students' work when they submit their projects or come to office hours. Another common problem in introductory programming courses is that student code is only subjected to rigorous testing once it has been submitted. Both of these problems can be viewed as a lack of feedback between students and instructors.We have built an Eclipse plugin to address this lack of feedback. The plugin has two main functions. First, it captures, to a central CVS repository, the complete state of a student's project every time he or she saves, adds, or removes a file. This produces a fine-grained history of the evolution of each student's project. Second, the plugin allows the student to submit his or her project to a central server. The submit server automatically compiles and performs limited testing of the student's submission, providing feedback on how close the project is to fulfilling the project requirements.Our goal is to provide instructors and researchers with far more detailed information about how students learn and work, and provide feedback to students that will help them focus on achieving the goals of the projects we assign.

References

  1. S. K. Adrianoff, D. B. Levine, S. D. Gewand, and G. A. Heissenberger. A testing-based framework for programming contests. In Proceedings of the Eclipse Technology Exchange Workshop, Anaheim, CA, USA, October 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. CVS. http://www.cvshome.org, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. D. Hovemeyer and W. Pugh. Finding bugs is easy. SIGPLAN Notices, December 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. M. Kölling, B. Quig, A. Patterson, and J. Rosenberg. The BlueJ system and its pedagogy. Journal of Computer Science Education, 13(4), December 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Y. Liu, E. Stroulia, K. Wong, and D. German. Using CVS historical information to understand how students develop software. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Mining Software Repositories, Edinburgh, Scotland, May 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. C. Reis and R. Cartwright. A friendly face for eclipse. In Proceedings of the 2003 OOPSLA workshop on eclipse technology eXchange, pages 25--29. ACM Press, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. D. Saff and M. D. Ernst. An experimental evaluation of continuous testing during development. In ISSTA 2004, Proceedings of the 2004 International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis, pages 76--85, Boston, MA, USA, July 12--14, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. K. Wong, W. Blanchet, Y. Liu, C. Schofield, E. Stroulia, and Z. Xing. JRefleX: Towards supporting small student software teams. In Proceedings of the Eclipse Technology Exchange Workshop, Anaheim, CA, USA, October 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  1. An Eclipse-based course project snapshot and submission system

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      eclipse '04: Proceedings of the 2004 OOPSLA workshop on eclipse technology eXchange
      October 2004
      105 pages
      ISBN:9781450377980
      DOI:10.1145/1066129

      Copyright © 2004 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 24 October 2004

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate38of79submissions,48%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader