skip to main content
10.1145/1054972.1055012acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

The bubble cursor: enhancing target acquisition by dynamic resizing of the cursor's activation area

Published:02 April 2005Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present the bubble cursor - a new target acquisition technique based on area cursors. The bubble cursor improves upon area cursors by dynamically resizing its activation area depending on the proximity of surrounding targets, such that only one target is selectable at any time. We also present two controlled experiments that evaluate bubble cursor performance in 1D and 2D target acquisition tasks, in complex situations with multiple targets of varying layout densities. Results show that the bubble cursor significantly outperforms the point cursor and the object pointing technique [7], and that bubble cursor performance can be accurately modeled and predicted using Fitts' law.

References

  1. Accot, J. and Zhai, S. (2003). Refining Fitts' law models for bivariate pointing. ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. p. 193--200. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Aurenhammer, F. and Klein, R. (2000). Voronoi Diagrams. Chapter 5 in, in Handbook of computational geometry, J. Sack and J. Urrutia, Editors. North-Holland: Amsterdam, Netherlands. p. 201--290.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Baudisch, P., Cutrell, E., Robbins, D., Czerwinski, M., Tandler, P., Bederson, B., and Zierlinger, A. (2003). Drag-and-pop and drag-and-pick: Techniques for accessing remote screen content on touch- and pen-operated systems. Proceedings of Interact. p. 57--64.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Blanch, R., Guiard, Y., and Beaudouin-Lafon, M. (2004). Semantic pointing: improving target acquisition with control-display ratio adaptation. ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. p. 519--525. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Cockburn, A. and Firth, A. (2003). Improving the acquisition of small targets. British HCI Conference. p. 181--196.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Fitts, P.M. (1954). The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47. p. 381--391.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Grossman, T. and Balakrishnan, R. (2005 - in press). A probabilistic approach to modeling 2D pointing. To appear in ACM Transactions on Compute Human Interaction. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Guiard, Y., Blanch, R., and Beaudouin-Lafon, M. (2004). Object pointing: a complement to bitmap pointing in GUIs. Graphics Interface. p. 9--16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Kabbash, P. and Buxton, W. (1995). The "Prince" technique: Fitts' law and selection using area cursors. ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. p. 273--279. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Keyson, D. (1997). Dynamic cursor gain and tactual feedback in the capture of cursor movements. Ergonomics, 12. p. 1287--1298.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. MacKenzie, S. (1992). Fitts' law as a research and design tool in human-computer interaction. Human-Computer Interaction, 7. p. 91--139.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. MacKenzie, S. and Buxton, W. (1992). Extending Fitts' law to two-dimensional tasks. ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. p. 219--226. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. McGuffin, M. (2002). Fitts' law and expanding targets: an experimental study and applications to user interface design, M.Sc. Thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. McGuffin, M. and Balakrishnan, R. (2002). Acquisition of expanding targets. ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. p. 57--64. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Worden, A., Walker, N., Bharat, K., and Hudson, S. (1997). Making computers easier for older adults to use: area cursors and sticky icons. ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. p. 266--271. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Zhai, S., Buxton, W., and Milgram, P. (1994). The "Silk Cursor": Investigating transparency for 3D target acquisition. ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. p. 459--464. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Zhai, S., Conversy, S., Beaudouin-Lafon, M., and Guiard, Y. (2003). Human on-line response to target expansion. ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. p. 177--184. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. The bubble cursor: enhancing target acquisition by dynamic resizing of the cursor's activation area

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          CHI '05: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
          April 2005
          928 pages
          ISBN:1581139985
          DOI:10.1145/1054972

          Copyright © 2005 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 2 April 2005

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Article

          Acceptance Rates

          CHI '05 Paper Acceptance Rate93of372submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

          Upcoming Conference

          CHI '24
          CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
          May 11 - 16, 2024
          Honolulu , HI , USA

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader