skip to main content
10.1145/1054972.1054976acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Grounding needs: achieving common ground via lightweight chat in large, distributed, ad-hoc groups

Published:02 April 2005Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper reports on the emergent use of lightweight text chat to provide important grounding and facilitation information in a large, distributed, ad-hoc group of researchers participating in a live experiment. The success of chat in this setting suggests a critical re-examination and extension of Clark and Brennan's work on grounding in communication. Specifically, it is argued that there are some settings characterized by reduced information and clarification needs, where the use of extremely lightweight tools (such as basic text chat) can be sufficient for achieving common ground - even when conversational participants are unknown to each other. Theoretical and design implications are then presented.

References

  1. Explore the Sea. www.explorethesea.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Arzberger, P. and Finholt, T. Data and Collaboratories in the Biomedical Community. National Institues of Health, Ballston, VA, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Atkins, D. E., Droegemeier, K. K., Feldman, S. I., Garcia-Molina, H., Klein, M. L. and Messina, P. Revolutionizing Science and Engineering through Cyberinfrastructure: Report of the National Science Foundation Blue-Ribbon Advisory Panel on Cyberinfrastructure. National Science Foundation, Washington, DC, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Birnholtz, J. P. and Bietz, M. J. Data at Work: Supporting Sharing in Science and Engineering in Proceedings of ACM Conference on Supporting Group work (GROUP) (Sanibel Island, FL, November 9-12 2003). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Boehm, B. W. A Spiral Model of Software Development and Enhancement. in R. M. Baecker, J. Grudin, W. A. S. Buxton and S. Greenberg (eds.) Human Computer Interaction: Toward the Year 2000. Morgan Kaufman, San Francisco, CA. 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Bruce, B. C., Carragher, B., Damon, B. M., Dawson, M. J., Eurell, J. A., Gregory, C. D., Lauterbur, P. C., Marjanovic, M. M., Mason-Fossum, B., Morris, H. D., Potter, C. S. and Thakkar, U. Chickscope: An Interactive Mri Classroom Curriculum Innovation for K-12. Computers Education 29, 2/3 (1997), 73--87. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Clark, H. H. Arenas of Language Use. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Clark, H. H. and Brennan, S. E. Grounding in Communication. in L. B. Resnick, R. M. Levine and S. D. Teasley (eds.) Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC. 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Cohen, J. A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement 20, 1 (1960), 37--46.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Cummings, J. and Kiesler, S. KDI Initiative: Multidisciplinary Scientific Collaborations. http://netvis.mit.edu/papers/NSF_KDI_report.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. David, P. A. and Spence, M. Towards Institutional Infrastructures for E-Science: The Scope of the Challenge. The Oxford Internet Institute, Oxford, UK, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. DeSanctis, G. and Poole, M. S. Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory. Organization Science 5, 2 (1994), 121--147.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Erickson, T., Smith, D., Kellogg, W., Laff, M., Richards, J. and Bradner, E. Socially Translucent Systems: Social Proxies, Persistenct Conversation and the Design of "Babble" in Proceedings of Computer Human Interaction (Pittsburgh, PA, 1998) ACM Press, 72--79. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Finholt, T. A. Collaboratories as a New Form of Scientific Organization. Economics of Innovation and New Technologies 12, 1 (2003), 5--25.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Gergle, D., Millen, D. R., Kraut, R. and Fussell, S. R. Persistence Matters: Making the Most of Chat in Tightly-Coupled Work in Proceedings of ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Vienna Austria, April 24-29 2004) 431--438. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Grinter, R. E. and Eldridge, M. A. Y Do Tngrs Luv 2 Txt Msg? in Proceedings of Seventh European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. (Bonn, Germany, September 18-20 2001). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Grinter, R. E. and Palen, L. Instant Messaging in Teen Life in Proceedings of ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (New Orleans, LA, November 16-20 2002) 21--30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Handel, M. Communication Technologies and the Freshman Transition: Staying Close with Friends. Unpublished Dissertation, School of Information, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Handel, M. and Herbsleb, J. What Is Chat Doing in the Workplace? in Proceedings of Computer Supported Cooperative Work (New Orleans, LA, 2002) ACM Press, 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Herbsleb, J., Atkins, D. L., Boyer, D. G., Handel, M. and Finholt, T. A. Introducing Instant Messaging and Chat into the Workplace in Proceedings of Proceedings of ACM Conference on Computer Human Interaction (Minneapolis, MN, 2002) ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Hindus, D., Ackerman, M. S., Mainwaring, S. and Starr, B. Thunderwire: A Field Study of an Audio-Only Media Space in Proceedings of ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (Cambridge, MA, November 16-20 1996) 238--247. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Isaacs, E., Walendowski, A. and Ranganathan, D. Hubbub: A Sound-Enhanced Mobile Instant Messenger That Supports Awareness and Opportunistic Interactions in Proceedings of ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Minneapolis, MN, 2002). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Nardi, B., Whittaker, S. and Bradner, E. Interaction and Outeraction: Instant Messaging in Action in Proceedings of ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (Philadelphia, PA, 2000). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Netwich, M. Cyberscience: Research in the Age of the Internet. Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Olson, G. M., Daniel E. Atkins, Robert Clauer, Thomas A. Finholt, Farnam Jahanian, Timothy L. Killeen, Prakash, A. and Weymouth, T. The Upper Atmospheric Research Collaboratory. Interactions 5, 3 (1998), 48--55. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Potter, C. S., Carragher, B., Caroll, L., Conway, C., Grosser, B., Hanlon, J., Kisseberth, N., Robinson, S., Thakkar, U. and Weber, D. Bugscope: A Practical Approach to Providing Remote Microscopy for Science Education Outreach. Microscopy and Microanalysis 7, (2001), 249--252.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Sims, B. Concrete Practices: Testing in an Earthquake Engineering Laboratory. Social Studies of Science 29, 4 (1999), 483--518.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Smith, M. A., Farnham, S. D. and Drucker, S. M. The Social Life of Small Graphical Chat Spaces in Proceedings of ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (The Hague, Netherlands, April 1-6 2000) 462--469. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Taylor, A. S. and Harper, R. Age-Old Practices in the 'New World': A Study of Gift-Giving between Teenage Mobile Phone Users in Proceedings of ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Minneapolis, MN, April 20-25 2002) 439--446. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Uplift International Web Site. www.upliftinternational.org/telemed.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Veinott, E., Olson, J. S., Olson, G. M. and Fu, X. Video Helps Remote Work: Speakers Who Need to Negotiate Common Ground Benefit from Seeing Each Other in Proceedings of ACM conference on Computer-Human Interaction (Pittsburgh, PA, 1999). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Viegas, F. B. and Donath, J. S. Chat Circles in Proceedings of ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Pittsburgh, PA, May 15-20 1999) 9--16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Watts, J. C., Woods, D. D., Corban, J. M. and Patterson, E. S. Voice Loops as Cooperative Aids in Space Shuttle Mission Control in Proceedings of ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (Cambridge, MA, November 16-20 1996) 48--56. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Grounding needs: achieving common ground via lightweight chat in large, distributed, ad-hoc groups

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '05: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2005
      928 pages
      ISBN:1581139985
      DOI:10.1145/1054972

      Copyright © 2005 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 2 April 2005

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '05 Paper Acceptance Rate93of372submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader