ABSTRACT
Manipulating MW in driving simulator studies without the need to introduce a non-driving-related task remains challenging. This study aims to empirically evaluate the modified speed regulation n-back task, a tool to manipulate drivers’ MW. Our experiment involved 23 participants who experienced a 0-back and 2-back driving condition, with task-irrelevant novel environmental sounds used to elicit P3a event-related potentials. Results indicate that the 2-back condition was perceived as more demanding, evidenced by higher NASA-TLX scores (overall score, mental and temporal demand, effort, frustration). The mean P3a amplitude was diminished during the 2-back condition compared to the 0-back condition, suggesting that drivers experienced higher MW and had fewer resources available to process the novel environmental sounds. This study provides empirical evidence indicating that the speed regulation n-back task could be a valid, effective, and reproducible method to manipulate MW in driving research.
- B Rael Cahn and John Polich. 2009. Meditation (Vipassana) and the P3a event-related brain potential. International journal of psychophysiology 72, 1 (2009), 51–60.Google Scholar
- Marvin M Chun, Julie D Golomb, and Nicholas B Turk-Browne. 2011. A taxonomy of external and internal attention. Annual review of psychology 62 (2011), 73–101.Google Scholar
- Dick De Waard and KA Brookhuis. 1996. The measurement of drivers’ mental workload. (1996).Google Scholar
- David Embrey, Claire Blackett, Philip Marsden, and Jim Peachey. 2006. Development of a human cognitive workload assessment tool. MCA Final Report, Lancashire (2006), 1–253.Google Scholar
- Carles Escera, Kimmo Alho, István Winkler, and Risto Näätänen. 1998. Neural mechanisms of involuntary attention to acoustic novelty and change. Journal of cognitive neuroscience 10, 5 (1998), 590–604.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Monica Fabiani, Victoria A Kazmerski, Yael M Cycowicz, and David Friedman. 1996. Naming norms for brief environmental sounds: Effects of age and dementia. Psychophysiology 33, 4 (1996), 462–475.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Nikol Figalová, Hans-Joachim Bieg, Julian Elias Reiser, Yuan-Cheng Liu, Martin Baumann, Lewis Chuang, and Olga Pollatos. 2023. From Driver to Supervisor: Comparing Cognitive Load and EEG-based Attention Allocation across Automation Levels. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.08477 (2023).Google Scholar
- Sandra G Hart and Lowell E Staveland. 1988. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In Advances in psychology. Vol. 52. Elsevier, 139–183.Google Scholar
- Moritz Held, Jochem W Rieger, and Jelmer P Borst. 2022. Multitasking while driving: central bottleneck or problem state interference?Human factors (2022), 00187208221143857.Google Scholar
- Philipp Hock, Johannes Kraus, Franziska Babel, Marcel Walch, Enrico Rukzio, and Martin Baumann. 2018. How to design valid simulator studies for investigating user experience in automated driving: review and hands-on considerations. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications. 105–117.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Marius Klug, Sein Jeung, Anna Wunderlich, Lukas Gehrke, Janna Protzak, Zakaria Djebbara, Andreas Argubi-Wollesen, Bettina Wollesen, and Klaus Gramann. 2022. The BeMoBIL Pipeline for automated analyses of multimodal mobile brain and body imaging data. bioRxiv (2022).Google Scholar
- Arthur F Kramer, Leonard J Trejo, and Darryl Humphrey. 1995. Assessment of mental workload with task-irrelevant auditory probes. Biological psychology 40, 1-2 (1995), 83–100.Google Scholar
- Luca Pion-Tonachini, Ken Kreutz-Delgado, and Scott Makeig. 2019. ICLabel: An automated electroencephalographic independent component classifier, dataset, and website. NeuroImage 198 (2019), 181–197.Google ScholarCross Ref
- John Polich. 2007. Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clinical neurophysiology 118, 10 (2007), 2128–2148.Google Scholar
- Menja Scheer, Heinrich H Bülthoff, and Lewis L Chuang. 2016. Steering demands diminish the early-P3, late-P3 and RON components of the event-related potential of task-irrelevant environmental sounds. Frontiers in human neuroscience 10 (2016), 73.Google Scholar
- Jakob Scheunemann, Anirudh Unni, Klas Ihme, Meike Jipp, and Jochem W Rieger. 2019. Demonstrating brain-level interactions between visuospatial attentional demands and working memory load while driving using functional near-infrared spectroscopy. Frontiers in human neuroscience (2019), 542.Google Scholar
- Evona Teh, Samantha Jamson, Oliver Carsten, and Hamish Jamson. 2014. Temporal fluctuations in driving demand: The effect of traffic complexity on subjective measures of workload and driving performance. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour 22 (2014), 207–217.Google Scholar
- Anirudh Unni, Klas Ihme, Meike Jipp, and Jochem W Rieger. 2017. Assessing the driver’s current level of working memory load with high density functional near-infrared spectroscopy: A realistic driving simulator study. Frontiers in human neuroscience 11 (2017), 167.Google Scholar
- Remo MA Van der Heiden, Christian P Janssen, Stella F Donker, Lotte ES Hardeman, Keri Mans, and J Leon Kenemans. 2018. Susceptibility to audio signals during autonomous driving. PloS one 13, 8 (2018), e0201963.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Anne E Wester, Koen BE Böcker, Edmund R Volkerts, Joris C Verster, and J Leon Kenemans. 2008. Event-related potentials and secondary task performance during simulated driving. Accident Analysis & Prevention 40, 1 (2008), 1–7.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Christopher D Wickens. 2008. Multiple resources and mental workload. Human factors 50, 3 (2008), 449–455.Google Scholar
Recommendations
Event-related potentials as indices of mental workload while using an in-vehicle information system
New in-vehicle information systems are now being commercialized. Despite the expected benefits, some concerns exist that they may overload drivers' capacity and decrease performance. According to the multiple resource theory (Wickens, Hum Factors 50:449-...
Graded Visual Attention Modulates Brain Responses Evoked by Task-irrelevant Auditory Pitch Changes
Previous studies suggested that auditory change-specific neural responses are attention-independent and reflect central auditory processing. The automaticity of the brain's response to infrequent changes in pitch within a series of auditory tone pips ...
Neural Correlates of Auditory Repetition Priming: Reduced fMRI Activation in the Auditory Cortex
Repetition priming refers to enhanced or biased performance with repeatedly presented stimuli. Modality-specific perceptual repetition priming has been demonstrated behaviorally for both visually and auditorily presented stimuli. In functional ...
Comments