ABSTRACT
Ethical design can avoid collateral damage by anticipating or counteracting possible negative consequences of technology on society, users, environment, among others. In this course, we aim to provide knowledge about psychological needs and values and the ethical implications of experience-centered interaction design. Therefore, the course consists of three interactive sessions. Each session includes briefings on the scientific background and approach, followed by interactive exercises and discussions so that participants can directly apply and deepen their knowledge. The course concludes with a summary of the learnings and a discussion about the applied methods. The results will be documented and subsequently made available to the participants.
- Bootcamp Bootleg. 2011. School Bootcamp Bootleg. Online.Google Scholar
- Pieter Desmet and Steven Fokkinga. 2020. Beyond Maslow’s Pyramid: Introducing a Typology of Thirteen Fundamental Needs for Human-Centered Design. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction 4, 3 (2020), 38. Number: 3 Publisher: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Batya Friedman, Peter Kahn, and Alan Borning. 2002. Value sensitive design: Theory and methods. University of Washington technical report 2 (2002), 12.Google Scholar
- Marc Hassenzahl. 2003. The thing and I: understanding the relationship between user and product. In Funology. Springer, Dordrecht, 31–42.Google Scholar
- Marc Hassenzahl, Kai Eckoldt, Sarah Diefenbach, Matthias Laschke, Eva Len, and Joonhwan Kim. 2013. Designing moments of meaning and pleasure. Experience design and happiness. International journal of design 7, 3 (2013), 21–31. Publisher: Chinese Institute of Design.Google Scholar
- Veronica Hoth, Maria Ivanova, and Stefan Brandenburg. 2022. UX Design Pattern für Datenschutz und Vertrauen. In Mensch und Computer 2022 - Workshopband, Karola Marky, Uwe Grünefeld, and Thomas Kosch (Eds.). Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V., Bonn, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.18420/muc2022-mci-ws07-424Google ScholarCross Ref
- ISO. 2019. Ergonomics of human-system interaction — Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems. Norm ISO 9241-210:2019. ISO, Genf, Schweiz. Issue: ISO 9241-210:2019.Google Scholar
- Anne Elisabeth Krueger. 2022. Two methods for Experience Design based on the Needs Empathy Map: Persona with Needs and Needs Persona. In Mensch und Computer 2022 - Workshopband, Karola Marky, Uwe Grünefeld, and Thomas Kosch (Eds.). Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V., Bonn, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.18420/muc2022-mci-ws07-425Google ScholarCross Ref
- Anne Elisabeth Krueger and Sarah Minet. 2022. Designing Positive Experiences in Creative Workshops at Work Using a Warm UP Set Based on Psychological Needs. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction 6, 10 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/mti6100090Google ScholarCross Ref
- Anne Elisabeth Krüger, Stefan Brandenburg, Moritz Langner, and Michael Burmester. 2022. UUX (+ X) in der Praxis: Bedürfnisse und Werte für Unternehmen nutzbar machen. In Mensch und Computer 2022 - Workshopband, Karola Marky, Uwe Grünefeld, and Thomas Kosch (Eds.). Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V., Bonn, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.18420/muc2022-mci-ws07-114Google ScholarCross Ref
- Anne Elisabeth Krüger, Nora Fronemann, and Matthias Peissner. 2015. Das kreative Potential der Ingenieure–menschzentrierte Ingenieurskunst. In Stuttgarter Symposium für Produktentwicklung, SSP 2015 Entwicklung smarter Produkte für die Zukunft. H. Binz, B. Bertsche, W. Bauer und D. Roth, Stuttgart, 1–10.Google Scholar
- Anne Elisabeth Krüger, Sebastian Kurowski, Kathrin Pollmann, Nora Fronemann, and Matthias Peissner. 2017. Needs profile: sensitising approach for user experience research. In Proceedings of the 29th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction - OZCHI ’17. ACM Press, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, 41–48. https://doi.org/10.1145/3152771.3152776Google ScholarDigital Library
- Anne Elisabeth Krüger, Matthias Peissner, Nora Fronemann, and Kathrin Pollmann. 2016. BUILDING IDEAS: Guided Design for Experience. In Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction(NordiCHI ’16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 115:1–115:6. https://doi.org/10.1145/2971485.2996750 event-place: Gothenburg, Sweden.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Julia Thienen, William J Clancey, Giovanni E Corazza, Christoph Meinel, 2018. Theoretical foundations of design thinking. In Design thinking research. Springer, Cham, 13–40.Google Scholar
- Kath Zhou. 2021. Consideration Cards. Retrieved 10.10.2022. https://www.designethically.com/consideration-cardsGoogle Scholar
Index Terms
- Ethical Experience Design for the Value of Privacy based on Psychological Needs
Recommendations
Wrangling Ethical Design Complexity: Dilemmas, Tensions, and Situations
DIS '23 Companion: Companion Publication of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems ConferenceEthical engagement is central to the practice of design, impacting stakeholders across and beyond technology organizations as well as producing downstream social and environmental impacts. Scholars have previously described the ecologically-mediated ...
Experience Design Based on Values and Psychological Needs in a Corporate Context
Design, User Experience, and UsabilityAbstractIn Experience Design the focus is shifting from users to the technology creators. These people need to have a human-centred mindset to design for positive user experience of digital products and services. Hence, the traditional user-centred ...
Why value sensitive design needs ethical commitments
AbstractCurrently, value sensitive design (VSD) does not commit to a particular ethical theory. Critiques contend that without such an explicit commitment, VSD lacks a methodology for distinguishing genuine moral values from mere stakeholders-preferences ...
Comments