Anna Samira Praetorius
ABSTRACT
The Proteus Effect suggests that users of a virtual environment adapt their behavior to the characteristics of their respective avatars. The effect was introduced by Yee & Bailenson in 2007. Since then, a number of studies and experiments regarding the Proteus Effect have been conducted. Based on a review and comparison of their findings and conclusions about the theoretical framework of the effect and its explanatory approaches such as self-perception theory and priming, we are classifying these studies with regard to self-similarity, wishful identification and embodied presence. This allows for revealing parallels to the processes of self-identification, as these components represent first-order dimensions of the user-avatar bond. The results show that self-similarity can enhance the effect, as it can lead to a higher personal relevance of the avatar and thus facilitates mental rapprochement between user and avatar. Desirable characteristics of the avatar are integrated into the self-concept, whereas undesirable characteristics can be a barrier to the occurrence of the effect. Embodiment is particularly important with regard to self-perception theory and can represent a threshold for self-perception from the perspective of the avatar.
- Muhannad Quwaider, Abdullah Alabed and Rehab Duwairi. 2019. The Impact of Video Games on the Players Behaviors: A Survey. Procedia Computer Science, 151, 575–582.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Tobias C. Breiner and Luca D. Kolibius. 2019. Computerspiele im Diskurs. Aggression, Amokläufe und Sucht. Springer.Google Scholar
- Miguel Sicart. 2011. The Ethics of Computer Games. The MIT Press, Cambridge.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Garry Young, Monica T. Whitty. 2012. Transcending Taboos. A Moral and Psychological Examination of Cyberspace. Routledge.Google Scholar
- Jim Blascovich, Jack M. Loomis, Andrew C. Beall, Kimberly R. Swinth, Crystal L. Hoyt and Jeremy N. Bailenson. 2002. Immersive virtual environment technology as a methodological tool for social psychology. Psychological Inquiry, 13(2), 103–124.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jeremy N. Bailenson, Jim Blascovich, Andrew C. Beall and Jack M. Loomis. 2003. Interpersonal distance in immersive virtual environments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1–15.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Nick Yee and Jeremy N. Bailenson. 2007. The Proteus Effect: The Effect of Transformed Self-Representation on Behavior. Human Communication Research 33(3), 271–290.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Daryl J. Bem. 1967. Self-perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena. In: Psychological Review 74(3), 183–200. DOI: 10.1037/h0024835.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Elliot Aronson, Timothy D. Wilson and Robin M. Akert. 2011. Sozialpsychologie. 6th updated edition, Munich: Pearson Studium.Google Scholar
- Stephen D. Reicher, Russell Spears and Tom Postmes. 1995. A Social Identity Model of Deindividuation Phenomena. In: European Review of Social Psychology 6(1), 161–198. DOI: 10.1080/14792779443000049.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Amy L. Gonzales and Jeffrey T. Hancock. 2008. Identity Shift in Computer-Mediated Environments. In: Media Psychology 11(2), 167–185. DOI: 10.1080/15213260802023433.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Robin S. Rosenberg, Shawnee L. Baughman and Jeremy N. Bailenson. 2013. Virtual superheroes: using superpowers in virtual reality to encourage prosocial behavior. In: PloS one 8(1): e55003. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055003.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hayeon Song, Jihyun Kim and Kwan Min Lee. 2014. Virtual vs. real body in exergames: Reducing social physique anxiety in exercise experiences. In: Computers in Human Behavior 36, 282–285. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.059.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sofia Adelaide Osimo. Rodrigo Pizarro, Bernhard Spanlang and Mel Slater. 2015. Conversations between self and self as Sigmund Freud–A virtual body ownership paradigm for self counselling. In: Scientific Reports 5, 13899. DOI: 10.1038/srep13899.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sun Joo Grace Ahn, Joshua Bostick, Elise Ogle, Kristine L. Nowak, Kara T. McGillicuddy and Jeremy N. Bailenson. 2016. Experiencing Nature: Embodying Animals in Immersive Virtual Environments Increases Inclusion of Nature in Self and Involvement with Nature. In: J Comput-Mediat Comm 21(6), 399–419. DOI: 10.1111/jcc4.12173.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tabitha C. Peck, Sofia Seinfeld, Salvatore M. Aglioti and Mel Slater. 2013. Putting yourself in the skin of a black avatar reduces implicit racial bias. In: Consciousness and cognition 22(3), 779–787. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2013.04.016.Google Scholar
- Lara Maister, Mel Slater, Maria Sanchez-Vives and Manos Tsakiris. 2015. Changing bodies changes minds: owning another body affects social cognition. In: Trends in cognitive sciences 19(1), 6–12. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.11.001.Google Scholar
- Soo Youn Oh, Jeremy Bailenson, Erika Weisz and Jamil Zaki. 2016. Virtually old: Embodied perspective taking and the reduction of ageism under threat. In: Computers in Human Behavior 60, 398–410. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.007.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Domna Banakou, Parasuram D. Hanumanthu and Mel Slater. 2016. Virtual Embodiment of White People in a Black Virtual Body Leads to a Sustained Reduction in Their Implicit Racial Bias. In: Frontiers in human neuroscience 10, 601. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00601.Google Scholar
- Harry Farmer and Lara Maister. 2017. Putting Ourselves in Another's Skin: Using the Plasticity of Self-Perception to Enhance Empathy and Decrease Prejudice. In: Soc Just Res 30(4), 323–354. DOI: 10.1007/s11211-017-0294-1.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Divine Maloney. 2018. Mitigating Negative Effects of Immersive Virtual Avatars on Racial Bias. In: Florian Mueller, Daniel Johnson, Ben Schouten, Zachary O. Toups und Peta Wyeth (Eds.): Proceedings of the 2018 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play – CHI PLAY '18, Extended Abstracts. Melbourne, VIC, Australia, 28.10.–31.10.2018. ACM Press, 39–43.Google Scholar
- Victoria Groom, Jeremy N. Bailenson and Clifford Nass. 2009. The influence of racial embodiment on racial bias in immersive virtual environments. In: Social Influence 4(3), 231–248. DOI: 10.1080/15534510802643750.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Matthew S. Eastin, Osei Appiah and Vincent Cicchirllo. 2009. Identification and the Influence of Cultural Stereotyping on Postvideogame Play Hostility. In: Human Comm Res 35(3), 337–356. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2009.01354.x.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Domna Banakou, Raphaela Groten and Mel Slater. 2013. Illusory ownership of a virtual child body causes overestimation of object sizes and implicit attitude changes. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110(31), 12846–12851. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1306779110.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Konstantina Kilteni, Ilias Bergstrom and Mel Slater. 2013. Drumming in immersive virtual reality: The body shapes the way we play. In: IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics 19(4), 597–605. DOI: 10.1109/TVCG.2013.29.Google Scholar
- Nick Yee and Jeremy N. Bailenson. 2007. The Proteus Effect: The Effect of Transformed Self-Representation on Behavior. In: Human Comm Res 33(3), 271–290. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00299.x.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Nick Yee, Jeremy N. Bailenson and Nicolas Ducheneaut. 2009. The Proteus Effect. Implications of Transformed Digital Self-Representation on Online and Offline Behavior. In: Communication Research 36(2), 285–312. DOI: 10.1177/0093650208330254.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jorge Peña, Jeffrey T. Hancock and Nicholas A. Merola. 2009. The Priming Effects of Avatars in Virtual Settings. In: Communication Research 36(6), 838–856. DOI: 10.1177/0093650209346802.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Nick Yee and Jeremy N. Bailenson. 2009. The Difference Between Being and Seeing: The Relative Contribution of Self-Perception and Priming to Behavioral Changes via Digital Self-Representation. In: Media Psychology 12(2), 195–209. DOI: 10.1080/15213260902849943.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Nick Yee, Nicolas Ducheneaut, Mike Yao and Les Nelson. 2011. Do men heal more when in drag? In: Desney Tan, Geraldine Fitzpatrick, Carl Gutwin, Bo Begole und Wendy A. Kellogg (Eds.): Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference on Human factors in computing systems – CHI '11. Vancouver, BC, Canada, 07.05.–12.05.2011. ACM Press.Google Scholar
- Jesse Fox, Jeremy N. Bailenson and Liz Tricase. 2012. The embodiment of sexualized virtual selves: The Proteus effect and experiences of self-objectification via avatars. In: Computers in Human Behavior 29(3), 930–938. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.027.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Brandon van der Heide, Erin M. Schumaker, Ashley M. Peterson and Elizabeth B. Jones. 2012. The Proteus Effect in Dyadic Communication. In: Communication Research 40(6), 838–860. DOI: 10.1177/0093650212438097.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Brett Sherrick, Jennifer Hoewe and T. Franklin Waddell. 2014. The role of stereotypical beliefs in genderbased activation of the Proteus effect. In: Computers in Human Behavior 38, 17–24. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.010.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jong-Eun Roselyn Lee, Clifford I. Nass and Jeremy N. Bailenson. 2014. Does the mask govern the mind? Effects of arbitrary gender representation on quantitative task performance in avatar-represented virtual groups. In: Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking 17(4), 248–254. DOI: 10.1089/cyber.2013.0358.Google Scholar
- Yulong Bian, Chao Zhou, Yu Tian, Peng Wang and Fengqiang Gao. 2015. The Proteus Effect: Influence of Avatar Appearance on Social Interaction in Virtual Environments. In: Constantine Stephanidis (Ed.): HCI International 2015 – Posters’ Extended Abstracts, Bd. 529. Cham: Springer International Publishing (Communications in Computer and Information Science), 78–83.Google Scholar
- Erin Ash. 2016. Priming or Proteus Effect? Examining the Effects of Avatar Race on In-Game Behavior and Post-Play Aggressive Cognition and Affect in Video Games. In: Games and Culture 11(4), 422–440. DOI: 10.1177/1555412014568870.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jérôme Guegan, Stéphanie Buisine, Fabrice Mantelet, Nicolas Maranzana and Frédéric Segonds. 2016. Avatar-mediated creativity: When embodying inventors makes engineers more creative. In: Computers in Human Behavior 61, 165–175. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.024.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Alwin de Rooij, Sarah van der Land and Shelly van Erp. 2017. The Creative Proteus Effect. In: David A. Shamma, Jude Yew und Brian Bailey (Eds.): Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition – C&C '17. Singapore, Singapore, 27.06.–30.06.2017. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press, 232–236.Google Scholar
- Jessica McCain, Sun Joo Ahn and W. Keith Campbell. 2018. Is Desirability of the Trait a Boundary Condition of the Proteus Effect? A Pilot Study. In: Communication Research Reports 35(5), 445–455. DOI: 10.1080/08824096.2018.1531212.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Akimi Oyanagi and Ren Ohmura. 2019. Transformation to a bird. In: Xudong Jiang, Lipo Wang, Nobuhiko Mukai und Lih-Shyang Chen (Eds.): Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Image and Graphics Processing – ICIGP '19. Singapore, 23.02.–25.02.2019. ACM Press, 145–149.Google ScholarDigital Library
- René Reinhard, Khyati Girish Shah, Corinna A. Faust-Christmann and Thomas Lachmann. 2019. Acting your avatar's age: Effects of virtual reality avatar embodiment on real life walking speed. In: Media Psychology 6, 1–23. DOI: 10.1080/15213269.2019.1598435.Google Scholar
- Rabindra Ratan, David Beyea, Benjamin J. Li and Luis Graciano. 2019. Avatar characteristics induce users’ behavioral conformity with small-to-medium effect sizes: A meta-analysis of the proteus effect. In: Media Psychology 11(4), 1–25. DOI: 10.1080/15213269.2019.1623698.Google Scholar
- Jan van Looy, Cédric Courtois, Melanie de Vocht and Lieven de Marez. 2012. Player Identification in Online Games: Validation of a Scale for Measuring Identification in MMOGs. In: Media Psychology 15(2), 197–221. DOI: 10.1080/15213269.2012.674917.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Anna S. Praetorius. 2019. Der Proteus-Effekt: Wie setzt sich das theoretische Framework zusammen? Bachelor Thesis. SRH University Heidelberg.Google Scholar
- Michael Madary and Thomas K. Metzinger. 2016. Real Virtuality: A Code of Ethical Conduct. Recommendations for Good Scientific Practice and the Consumers of VR-Technology. In: Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 3. DOI:10.3389/frobt.2016.00003Google Scholar
- How Avatars Influence User Behavior: A Review on the Proteus Effect in Virtual Environments and Video Games
Recommendations
The embodiment of sexualized virtual selves: The Proteus effect and experiences of self-objectification via avatars
Research has indicated that many video games and virtual worlds are populated by unrealistic, hypersexualized representations of women, but the effects of embodying these representations remains understudied. The Proteus effect proposed by Yee and ...
Observing Virtual Avatars: The Impact of Avatars’ Fidelity on Identifying Interactions
Academic Mindtrek '21: Proceedings of the 24th International Academic Mindtrek ConferenceThere are many cases where observing the interactions of a virtual avatar can be useful. However, it is unclear to what extent the avatar fidelity affects bystanders’ performance when observing gestures performed by avatars. We, therefore, conducted an ...
Proteus effect or bodily affordance? The influence of virtual high-heels on gait behavior
AbstractShoes are an important part of the fashion industry, stereotypically affect our self-awareness as well as external perception, and can even biomechanically modify our gait pattern. Immersive Virtual Reality (VR) enables users not only to explore ...
Comments