ABSTRACT
Online communities, much like companies in the business world, often need to transfer 'best practices' internally from one unit to another to improve their performance. Organizational scholars disagree about how much a recipient unit should modify a best practice when incorporating it. Some evidence indicates that modifying a practice that has been successful in one environment will introduce problems, undercut its effectiveness and harm the performance of the recipient unit. Other evidence, though, suggests that recipients need to adapt the practice to fit their local environment. The current research introduces a contingency perspective on practice transfer, holding that the value of modifications depends on when they are introduced and who introduces them. Empirical research on the transfer of a quality-improvement practice between projects within Wikipedia shows that modifications are more helpful if they are introduced after the receiving project has had experience with the imported practice. Furthermore, modifications are more effective if they are introduced by members who have experience in a variety of other projects.
- Terry L Amburgey, Dawn Kelly, and William P Barnett. 1993. Resetting the Clock: The Dynamics of Organizational Change and Failure. Administrative Science Quarterly: 51–73.Google Scholar
- Linda Argote and Paul Ingram. 2000. Knowledge Transfer: A Basis for Competitive Advantage in Firms. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 82, 1: 150–169.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Linda Argote. 2012. Organizational learning: Creating, retaining and transferring knowledge. Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
- Linda Argote and Ella Miron-Spektor. 2011. Organizational learning: From experience to knowledge. Organization science 22, 5: 1123–1137. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kenneth J. Arrow. 1974. The limits of organization. W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
- Timothy T Baldwin and J Kevin Ford. 1994. Transfer of training: A review and directions for future research. The training and development sourcebook 180.Google Scholar
- Joel AC Baum and Paul Ingram. 1998. SurvivalEnhancing Learning in the Manhattan Hotel Industry, 1898–1980. Management Science , 996-1016. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yochai Benkler. 2002. Coase's Penguin, or, Linux and' The Nature of the Firm.' Yale Law Journal: 369–446.Google Scholar
- Tom E Burns and George Macpherson Stalker. 1961. The management of innovation. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign's Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship.Google Scholar
- Brian Butler, Elisabeth Joyce, and Jacqueline Pike. 2008. Don't look now, but we've created a bureaucracy: the nature and roles of policies and rules in wikipedia. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, ACM, 1101–1110. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jeffrey L Cummings and Bing-Sheng Teng. 2003. Transferring R&D knowledge: the key factors affecting knowledge transfer success. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 20, 1-2: 39–68.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Eric D. Darr, Linda Argote, and Dennis Epple. 1995. The acquisition, transfer, and depreciation of knowledge in service organizations: Productivity in franchises. Management Science 41(11), 1750–1762. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Angelo S DeNisi, Michael A Hitt, and Susan E Jackson. 2003. The knowledge-based approach to sustainable competitive advantage. Managing knowledge for sustained competitive advantage: Designing strategies for effective human resource management: 3–33.Google Scholar
- Vanessa Urch Druskat and Jane V Wheeler. 2004. How to lead a self-managing team. MIT Sloan Management Review 45, 4: 65.Google Scholar
- Stanislav D Dobrev, Tai-Young Kim, and Michael T Hannan. 2001. Dynamics of Niche Width and Resource Partitioning1. American Journal of Sociology 106, 5: 1299–1337.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Glen Dowell and Anand Swaminathan. 2000. Racing and back-pedalling into the future: New product introduction and organizational mortality in the US bicycle industry, 1880-1918. Organization Studies 21, 2: 405–431.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Martha S Feldman and Brian T Pentland. Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change. Administrative Science Quarterly 48, 1: 94–118.Google Scholar
- Craig S Galbraith. 1990. Transferring core manufacturing technologies in high-technology firms. California Management Review 32, 4: 56.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Deborah H Gruenfeld, Paul V. Martorana, and Elliott T. Fan. 2000. What Do Groups Learn from Their Worldliest Members? Direct and Indirect Influence in Dynamic Teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 82, 1: 45–59.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Morten T Hansen. 1999. The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative science quarterly 44, 1: 82–111.Google Scholar
- Morten T Hansen. 2002. Knowledge Networks: Explaining Effective Knowledge Sharing in Multiunit Companies. Organization science 13, 3: 232–248. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Robert J. Jensen and Gabriel Szulanski. 2007. Template Use and the Effectiveness of Knowledge Transfer. Management Science 53, April 2015: 1716–1730. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Aimée A Kane, Linda Argote, and John M Levine. Knowledge transfer between groups via personnel rotation: Effects of social identity and knowledge quality. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 96, 1: 56–71.Google Scholar
- Shilpa Kannan. HOW MCDONALD'S CONQUERED INDIA, BBC News, Delhi. 19 November 2014. http://www.bbc.com/news/business-30115555Google Scholar
- Linsu Kim and Richard R Nelson. 2000. Technology, learning, and innovation: Experiences of newly industrializing economies. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Robert E Kraut, Paul Resnick, Sara Kiesler, et al. 2012. Building successful online communities: Evidencebased social design. Mit Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Travis Kriplean, Ivan Beschastnikh, and David W McDonald. 2008. Articulations of wikiwork: uncovering valued work in wikipedia through barnstars. Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, ACM, 47–56. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bruce Kogut and Udo Zander. 1993. Knowledge of the Firm and the Evolutionary Theory of the Multinational Corporation. Journal of International Business Studies 24, 4: 625–645.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Edward E Lawler, Susan Albers Mohrman, and George Benson. 2001. Organizing for high performance: Employee involvement, TQM, reengineering, and knowledge management in the Fortune 1000: The CEO report. Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Sunkee Lee, Florian Rittiner, and Gabriel Szulanski. 2015. The Past, Present, and Future of Organizational Learning Research A Conversation With Professor Linda Argote. Journal of Management InquiryGoogle Scholar
- Steven A Lippman and Richard P Rumelt. 1982. Uncertain imitability: An analysis of interfirm differences in efficiency under competition. The Bell Journal of Economics: 418–438.Google Scholar
- Barbara Levitt and James G. March. 1988. Organizational learning. Annual review of sociology 14, 1988: 319–340.Google Scholar
- Kimberly Ling, Gerard Beenen, Pamela Ludford, et al. 2005. Using social psychology to motivate contributions to online communities. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 10 (4).Google ScholarCross Ref
- Will Mitchell and Kulwant Singh. 1993. Death of the lethargic: Effects of expansion into new technical subfields on performance in a firm's base business. Organization Science 4, 2: 152–180. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jakob Nielsen. 1993. Iterative user-interface design. Computer 26, 11: 32–41. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wanda J Orlikowski. 1992. Learning from notes: Organizational issues in groupware implementation. Proceedings of the 1992 ACM conference on Computersupported cooperative work, ACM, 362–369. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wanda J Orlikowski. 1996. Improvising organizational transformation over time: A situated change perspective. Information systems research 7, 1: 63–92. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Craig L Pearce and Jay A Conger. 2002. Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership. Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Ben Shneiderman. 1992. Designing the user interface: strategies for effective human-computer interaction. Addison-Wesley Reading, MA. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jitendra V Singh, Robert J House, and David J Tucker. 1986. Organizational change and organizational mortality. Administrative Science Quarterly: 587–611.Google Scholar
- Gabriel Szulanski. 2000. The Process of Knowledge Transfer: A Diachronic Analysis of Stickiness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 82, 1: 9–27.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gabriel Szulanski and ROBERT J. JENSEN. 2006. Presumptive adaptation and the effectiveness of knowledge transfer. Strategic Management Journal 957, February: 12.Google Scholar
- Gabriel Szulanski. Exploring Internal Stickiness: Impediments to the Transfer of Best Practice Within the Firm. 17: 27–43.Google Scholar
- Leigh Thompson, Dedre Gentner, and Jeffrey Loewenstein. Avoiding Missed Opportunities in Managerial Life: Analogical Training More Powerful Than Individual Case Training. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 82, 1: 60–75.Google Scholar
- Marcie J Tyre and Wanda J Orlikowski. Windows of Opportunity: Temporal Patterns of Technological Adaptation in Organizations. 5, 1: 98–118.Google Scholar
- Morten Warncke-Wang, Vladislav R Ayukaev, Brent Hecht, and Loren G Terveen. 2015. The Success and Failure of Quality Improvement Projects in Peer Production Communities. Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, ACM, 743–756. Google ScholarDigital Library
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:BarnstarsGoogle Scholar
- Sidney G. Winter and Gabriel Szulanski. 2001. Replication as Strategy. Organization Science 12, 6: 730–743. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sidney G. Winter, Gabriel Szulanski, Dimo Ringov, and Robert J. Jensen. 2012. Reproducing knowledge: inaccurate replication and failure in franchise organizations. April 2015.Google Scholar
- Jisun Yu and Srilata Zaheer. 2010. Building a process model of local adaptation of practices: A study of Six Sigma implementation in Korean and US firms. Journal of International Business Studies. 41, 3: 475–499.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Haiyi Zhu, Robert E. Kraut, and Aniket Kittur. 2012. Organizing without formal organization: group identification, goal setting and social modeling in directing online production. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 935-944). ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Haiyi Zhu, Robert E. Kraut, and Aniket Kittur. 2012. Effectiveness of shared leadership in online communities. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 407-416). ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
A Contingency View of Transferring and Adapting Best Practices within Online Communities
Recommendations
Best practices for conducting fieldwork with marginalized communities
AbstractFieldwork is indispensable for understanding, explaining, and predicting the role of information and communication technologies for development (ICT4D) of marginalized communities. Engaging with marginalized communities is at the heart ...
Contingency research in operations management practices
AbstractAs operations management (OM) best practices have become mature, research on practices has begun to shift its interest from the justification of the value of those practices to the understanding of the contextual conditions under which they are ...
Comments