Bin Xu
Dan Cosley
ABSTRACT
Unlike most social media, where automatic archiving of data is the default, Snapchat defaults to ephemerality: deleting content shortly after it is viewed by a receiver. Interviews with 25 Snapchat users show that ephemerality plays a key role in shaping their practices. Along with friend-adding features that facilitate a network of mostly close relations, default deletion affords everyday, mundane talk and reduces self-consciousness while encouraging playful interaction. Further, although receivers can save content through screenshots, senders are notified; this selective saving with notification supports complex information norms that preserve the feel of ephemeral communication while supporting the capture of meaningful content. This dance of giving and taking, sharing and showing, and agency for both senders and receivers provides the basis for a rich design space of mechanisms, levels, and domains for ephemerality.
- Liam J. Bannon. 2006. Forgetting as a feature, not a bug: the duality of memory and implications for ubiquitous computing. CoDesign 2, 1: 3–15. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15710880600608230Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Joseph B. Bayer, Nicole Ellison, Sarita Y. Schoenebeck, Emily B. Falk. 2015. Sharing the Small Moments: Ephemeral Social Interaction on Snapchat. Information, Communication & Society, 1-22. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.10843Google Scholar
- Natalya N. Bazarova, Jessie G. Taft, Yoon Hyung Choi, and Dan Cosley. 2012. Managing impressions and relationships on Facebook: Self-presentational and relational concerns revealed through the analysis of language style. Language and Social Psychology 32, 2: 121–141. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0261927X12456384Google ScholarCross Ref
- Susan Bluck and Nicole Alea. 2002. Exploring the functions of autobiographical memory: Why do I remember the autumn. In Critical advances in reminiscence work: From theory to application, Jeffrey Dean Webster and Barbara K. Haight (eds.). Springer Publishing Company, 61–75.Google Scholar
- Alvan Bregman and C Haythornwaite. 2001. Radicals of presentation in persistent conversation. In Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1-10. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2001.926499 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pei-Yu Chi, Xiao Xiao, Keywon Chung, and Carnaven Chiu. 2009. Burn your memory away: one-time use video capture and storage device to encourage memory appreciation. In CHI '09 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2397-2406. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1520340.1520342 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Robert B. Cialdini. 1993. Influence: The psychology of persuasion. New York: Morrow.Google Scholar
- Herbert H. Clark and Susan E. Brennan. 1991. Grounding in communication. In Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition, Lauren B. Resnick, John M. Levine and Stephanie D. Teasley (eds.). American Psychological Association, 127–149.Google Scholar
- Steve Duck, Deborah J. Rutt, Margaret H. Hurst, and Heather Strejc. 1991. Some evident truths about conversations in everyday relationships: All communications are not created equal. Human Communication Research 18, 2: 228–267. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1111/j.14682958.1991.tb00545.xGoogle ScholarCross Ref
- Thomas Erickson and Wendy A. Kellogg. 2000. Social translucence: an approach to designing systems that support social processes. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 7, 1 (March 2000), 59-83. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/344949.345004 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mattias Esbjörnsson, Oskar Juhlin, and Mattias ã–stergen. 2003. Motorcycling and social interaction: design for the enjoyment of brief traffic encounters. In Proceedings of the 2003 international ACM SIGGROUP conference on Supporting group work (GROUP '03). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 8594. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/958160.958174 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Benjamin C. M. Fung, Ke Wang, Rui Chen, and Philip S. Yu. 2010. Privacy-preserving data publishing: A survey of recent developments. ACM Comput. Surv. 42, 4, Article 14 (June 2010), 53 pages. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1749603.1749605 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Shelly L. Gable, Harry T. Reis, Emily A. Impett, and Evan R. Asher. 2004. What do you do when things go right? The intrapersonal and interpersonal benefits of sharing positive events. Personality and Social Psychology 87, 2: 228. http://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-3514.87.2.228Google ScholarCross Ref
- William W. Gaver. 1991. Technology affordances. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '91), Scott P. Robertson, Gary M. Olson, and Judith S. Olson (Eds.). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 79-84. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/108844.108856 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Erving Goffman. 1959. The presentation of self in everyday life. Random House.Google Scholar
- Daena J. Goldsmith and Leslie A. Baxter. 1996. Constituting relationships in talk a taxonomy of speech events in social and personal relationships. Human Communication Research 23, 1: 87–114. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.14682958.1996.tb00388.xGoogle ScholarCross Ref
- Rebecca Gulotta, William Odom, Jodi Forlizzi, and Haakon Faste. 2013. Digital artifacts as legacy: exploring the lifespan and value of digital data. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1813-1822. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466240 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jeffrey T. Hancock, Catalina Toma, and Nicole Ellison. 2007. The truth about lying in online dating profiles. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 449-452. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240697 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bernie Hogan. 2010. The presentation of self in the age of social media: Distinguishing performances and exhibitions online. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 30, 6: 377-386. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1177/0270467610385893Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gordon Hull, Heather Richter Lipford, and Celine Latulipe. 2011. Contextual gaps: Privacy issues on Facebook. Ethics and Information Technology 13, 4: 289–302. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10676-0109224-8 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Anne Kaun, and Stiernstedt Fredrik. 2014. Facebook time: Technological and institutional affordances for media memories. New Media & Society 16, 7: 1154– 1168. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461444814544001Google ScholarCross Ref
- David S. Kirk and Abigail Sellen. 2010. On human remains: Values and practice in the home archiving of cherished objects. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 17, 3, Article 10 (July 2010), 43 pages. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1806923.1806924 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Paul M. Leonardi and Diane E. Bailey. 2008. Transformational technologies and the creation of new work practices: Making implicit knowledge explicit in task-based offshoring. Management Information Systems Quarterly 32, 2: 411–436. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Michael Massimi and Ronald M. Baecker. 2011. Dealing with death in design: developing systems for the bereaved. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 10011010. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979092 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Michael Massimi, William Odom, Richard Banks, and David Kirk. 2011. Matters of life and death: locating the end of life in lifespan-oriented hci research. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 987-996. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979090 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Viktor Mayer-Schönberger. 2011. Delete: the virtue of forgetting in the digital age. Princeton University Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Helen Nissenbaum. 2009. Privacy in context: Technology, policy, and the integrity of social life. Stanford University Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Helen Nissenbaum. 2011. A contextual approach to privacy online. Daedalus 140, 4: 32–48.Google ScholarCross Ref
- William Odom, Richard Banks, David Kirk, Richard Harper, Siân Lindley, and Abigail Sellen. 2012. Technology heirlooms?: considerations for passing down and inheriting digital materials. InProceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 337-346. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2207723 Google ScholarDigital Library
- William Odom, James Pierce, Erik Stolterman, and Eli Blevis. 2009. Understanding why we preserve some things and discard others in the context of interaction design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1053-1062. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518862 Google ScholarDigital Library
- William Odom, Abi Sellen, Richard Harper, and Eno Thereska. 2012. Lost in translation: understanding the possession of digital things in the cloud. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 781-790. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2207789 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sandra Petronio. 2012. Boundaries of privacy: Dialectics of disclosure. Suny Press.Google Scholar
- Artemio Ramirez and Kathy Broneck. 2009. 'IM me': Instant messaging as relational maintenance and everyday communication. Social and Personal Relationships 26, 2–3: 291–314. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1177/0265407509106719Google ScholarCross Ref
- Franziska Roesner, Gill T. Brian, and Tadayoshi Kohno. 2014. Sex, lies, or kittens? Investigating the use of snapchat's self-destructing messages. Financial Cryptography and Data Security, 8437: 64–76. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45472-5_5Google Scholar
- Abigail J. Sellen and Steve Whittaker. 2010. Beyond total capture: a constructive critique of lifelogging. Commun. ACM 53, 5 (May 2010), 70-77. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1735223.1735243 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Stuart J. Sigman. 1991. Handling the Discontinuous Aspects of Continuous Social Relationships: Toward Research on the Persistence of Social Forms. Communication Theory 1, 2: 106–127. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.14682885.1991.tb00008.xGoogle ScholarCross Ref
- Victoria Schwanda Sosik and Natalya N. Bazarova. 2014. Relational maintenance on social network sites: How Facebook communication predicts relational escalation. Computers in Human Behavior 35:124–131. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.044Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jeffrey W. Treem and Paul M. Leonardi. 2012. Social media use in organizations: Exploring the affordances of visibility, editability, persistence, and association. Communication Yearbook 36: 143–189. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2129853Google Scholar
- Steve Whittaker. 2003. Theories and methods in mediated communication. In The Handbook of Discourse Processes, Arthur C. Graesser, Morton Ann Gernsbacher and Susan R. Goldman (eds.). Routledge, 243–286.Google Scholar
- Scott Wright. 2012. From third place to third space: Everyday political talk in non-political online spaces. Javnost-the Public 19, 3: 5–20. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1080/13183222.2012.11009088Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bin Xu, Alvin Chin, Hao Wang, Lele Chang, Ke Zhang, Fangxi Yin, Hao Wang, Li Zhang. Physical Proximity and Online User Behavior in an Indoor Mobile Social Networking Application. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Cyber, Physical and Social Computing (CPSCom 2011). IEEE, 273–282. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/iThings/CPSCom.2011. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Xuan Zhao and Siân E. Lindley. 2014. Curation through use: understanding the personal value of social media. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2431-2440. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557291 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Xuan Zhao, Niloufar Salehi, Sasha Naranjit, Sara Alwaalan, Stephen Voida, and Dan Cosley. 2013. The many faces of facebook: experiencing social media as performance, exhibition, and personal archive. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1-10. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2470656 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Automatic Archiving versus Default Deletion: What Snapchat Tells Us About Ephemerality in Design
Recommendations
Share First, Save Later: Performance of Self through Snapchat Stories
CHI '17: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsAs the third most popular social network among millennials, Snapchat is well known for its picture and video messaging system that deletes content after it is viewed. However, the Stories feature of Snapchat offers a different perspective of ephemeral ...
Personality Depends on The Medium: Differences in Self-Perception on Snapchat, Facebook and Offline
CHI '18: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsWe investigate self-perception in social media through the lens of personality theory. Two mixed-methods studies involving 148 participants examine if people self-report different personality traits in social media compared with their offline traits. We ...
Media, Meaning, and Context Loss in Ephemeral Communication Platforms: A Qualitative Investigation on Snapchat
CSCW '17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social ComputingMost social media platforms are persistent in nature, enabling users to re-visit content at their discretion. Platforms with design features that support ephemeral communications, such as Snapchat, have become increasingly popular. During the course of ...
Comments