Onur Varol
Emilio Ferrara
Christine L. Ogan
Filippo Menczer
ABSTRACT
Social media represent powerful tools of mass communication and information diffusion. They played a pivotal role during recent social uprisings and political mobilizations across the world. Here we present a study of the Gezi Park movement in Turkey through the lens of Twitter. We analyze over 2.3 million tweets produced during the 25 days of protest occurred between May and June 2013. We first characterize the spatio-temporal nature of the conversation about the Gezi Park demonstrations, showing that similarity in trends of discussion mirrors geographic cues. We then describe the characteristics of the users involved in this conversation and what roles they played. We study how roles and individual influence evolved during the period of the upheaval. This analysis reveals that the conversation becomes more democratic as events unfold, with a redistribution of influence over time in the user population. We conclude by observing how the online and offline worlds are tightly intertwined, showing that exogenous events, such as political speeches or police actions, affect social media conversations and trigger changes in individual behavior.
- S. Aday, H. Farrel, M. Lynch, J. Sides, J. Kelly, and E. Zuckerman. Blogs and bullets: New media in contentious politics. Technical report, U.S. Institute of Peace, 2010.Google Scholar
- S. Aral and D. Walker. Identifying influential and susceptible members of social networks. Science, 337(6092):337--341, 2012.Google ScholarCross Ref
- T. Arango. Protests in turkey reveal a larger fight over identity. NY Times, June 2, 2013.Google Scholar
- R. A. Ba\ nos, J. Borge-Holthoefer, and Y. Moreno. The role of hidden influentials in the diffusion of online information cascades. EPJ Data Science, 2(1):1--16, 2013.Google Scholar
- R. A. Ba\ nos, J. Borge-Holthoefer, N. Wang, Y. Moreno, and S. González-Bailón. Diffusion dynamics with changing network composition. Entropy, 15(11):4553--4568, 2013.Google Scholar
- R. Benford. An insider's critique of the social movement framing perspective. Sociological Inquiry, 67(4):409--430, 1997.Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. Benford and D. Snow. Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1):611--639, 2000.Google ScholarCross Ref
- W. Bennett. Communicating global activism: Strength and vulnerabilities of networked politics. Information, Communication & Society, 6(2):143--168, 2003.Google ScholarCross Ref
- W. Bennett. Changing citizenship in the digital age. The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Media and Learning, pages 1--24, 2007.Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. M. Bond, C. J. Fariss, J. J. Jones, A. D. Kramer, C. Marlow, J. E. Settle, and J. H. Fowler. A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization. Nature, 489(7415):295--298, 2012.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Borge-Holthoefer, A. Rivero, I. García, E. Cauhé, A. Ferrer, D. Ferrer, D. Francos, D. Iniguez, M. P. Pérez, G. Ruiz, et al. Structural and dynamical patterns on online social networks: the spanish may 15th movement as a case study. PLoS One, 6(8):e23883, 2011.Google ScholarCross Ref
- d. boyd and N. B. Ellison. Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. 2007. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 2010.Google Scholar
- J. Byrne. Occupy the media: Journalism for (and by) the 99 percent. In J. Bryne, editor, The Occupy Handbook, pages 256--264. Little, Brown, 2012.Google Scholar
- D. Centola. The spread of behavior in an online social network experiment. Science, 329(5996):1194--1197, 2010.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. Centola. An experimental study of homophily in the adoption of health behavior. Science, 334(6060):1269--1272, 2011.Google ScholarCross Ref
- N. Chomsky. Occupy. Zuccotti Park Press, 2012.Google Scholar
- A. Choudhary, W. Hendrix, K. Lee, D. Palsetia, and W. Liao. Social media evolution of the egyptian revolution. Communications of the ACM, 55(5):74--80, 2012. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Conover, J. Ratkiewicz, M. Francisco, B. Gonçalves, A. Flammini, and F. Menczer. Political polarization on Twitter. Proceedings of the 5th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, 2011.Google Scholar
- M. D. Conover, C. Davis, E. Ferrara, K. McKelvey, F. Menczer, and A. Flammini. The geospatial characteristics of a social movement communication network. PloS One, 8(3):e55957, 2013.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. D. Conover, E. Ferrara, F. Menczer, and A. Flammini. The digital evolution of occupy wall street. PloS One, 8(5):e64679, 2013.Google ScholarCross Ref
- E. Ferrara, O. Varol, F. Menczer, and A. Flammini. Traveling trends: social butterflies or frequent fliers? In Proceedings of the 1st ACM Conference on Online Social Networks, pages 213--222. ACM, 2013. Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. Garrett. Protest in an information society: A review of literature on social movements and new ICTs. Information, Communication & Society, 9(02):202--224, 2006.Google ScholarCross Ref
- N. Göle. Gezi--anatomy of a public square movement. Insight Turkey, 15(3), 2013.Google Scholar
- S. González-Bailón, J. Borge-Holthoefer, and Y. Moreno. Broadcasters and hidden influentials in online protest diffusion. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(7):943--965, 2013.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. González-Bailón, J. Borge-Holthoefer, A. Rivero, and Y. Moreno. The dynamics of protest recruitment through an online network. Scientific Reports, 1, 2011.Google Scholar
- P. Howard, A. Duffy, D. Freelon, M. Hussain, W. Mari, and M. Mazaid. Opening closed regimes: What was the role of social media during the arab spring. Technical Report 2011.1, Project on Information Technology and Political Islam, 2011.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Jenkins. Resource mobilization theory and the study of social movements. Annual Review of Sociology, 9:527--553, 1983.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. B. Kuymulu. Reclaiming the right to the city: Reflections on the urban uprisings in turkey. City, 17(3):274--278, 2013.Google ScholarCross Ref
- G. Lotan, E. Graeff, M. Ananny, D. Gaffney, I. Pearce, and danah boyd. The revolutions were tweeted: Information flows during the 2011 Tunisian and Egyptian revolutions. International Journal of Communication, 5:1375--1405, 2011.Google Scholar
- J. McCarthy and M. Zald. Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. American Journal of Sociology, 82(6):1212--1241, 1977.Google ScholarCross Ref
- P. Metaxas and E. Mustafaraj. The rise and the fall of a citizen reporter. In Proceedings of the 5th Annual ACM Web Science Conference, pages 248--257. ACM, 2013. Google ScholarDigital Library
- P. T. Metaxas and E. Mustafaraj. Social media and the elections. Science, 338(6106):472--473, 2012.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. Myers. Communication technology and social movements: Contributions of computer networks to activism. Social Science Computer Review, 12(2):250--260, 1994.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Z. Tufekci and C. Wilson. Social Media and the Decision to Participate in Political Protest: Observation from Tahrir Square. Journal of Communication, 62:363--379, 2012.Google ScholarCross Ref
- U. Uras. What inspires turkey's protest movement. Al Jazeera, June 5, 2013.Google Scholar
- S. Valenzuela, A. Arrigada, and A. Scherman. The Social Media Basis of Youth Protest Behavior: The Case of Chile. Journal of Communication, 62(2):299--314, 2012.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Van Laer and P. Van Aelst. Cyber-protest and civil society: the internet and action repertoires in social movements. Handbook on Internet Crime, pages 230--254, 2009.Google Scholar
- A. Vespignani. Predicting the behavior of techno-social systems. Science, 325(5939):425, 2009.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Wray. On electronic civil disobedience. Peace Review, 11(1):107--111, 1999.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Evolution of online user behavior during a social upheaval
Recommendations
Characterizing user behavior in online social networks
IMC '09: Proceedings of the 9th ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurementUnderstanding how users behave when they connect to social networking sites creates opportunities for better interface design, richer studies of social interactions, and improved design of content distribution systems. In this paper, we present a first ...
The Potential of Social Media in Russia: From Political Mobilization to Civic Engagement
EGOSE '14: Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Electronic Governance and Open Society: Challenges in EurasiaSocial media was one of the most influential platforms used by counterparts in many recent contentious political events all over the world. Both the statist and protest groups used web-based social networks for political mobilization during the ...
Social capital, social media, and TV ratings
Motivated by the increasing role of social media in relating to economic outcomes, this paper examines the relationship between social networking sites SNS and television ratings drawing from the social capital theoretical framework of bonding and ...
Comments