skip to main content
10.1145/1386790.1386805acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesecConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Tight information-theoretic lower bounds for welfare maximization in combinatorial auctions

Published:08 July 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

We provide tight information-theoretic lower bounds for the welfare maximization problem in combinatorial auctions. In this problem, the goal is to partition m items among k bidders in a way that maximizes the sum of bidders' values for their allocated items. Bidders have complex preferences over items expressed by valuation functions that assign values to all subsets of items.

We study the "black box" setting in which the auctioneer has oracle access to the valuation functions of the bidders. In particular, we explore the well-known value query model in which the permitted query to a valuation function is in the form of a subset of items, and the reply is the value assigned to that subset of items by the valuation function.

We consider different classes of valuation functions: submodular,subadditive, and superadditive. For these classes, it has been shown that one can achieve approximation ratios of 1 -- 1/e, 1/√m, and √ m/m, respectively, via a polynomial (in k and m) number of value queries. We prove that these approximation factors are essentially the best possible: For any fixed ε > 0, a (1--1/e + ε)-approximation for submodular valuations or an 1/m1/2-ε-approximation for subadditive valuations would require exponentially many value queries, and a log1+ε m/ m-approximation for superadditive valuations would require a superpolynomial number of value queries.

References

  1. L. Blumrosen and N. Nisan. On the computational power of iterative auctions I: Demand queries. In Proc. of the 6th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC), 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. L. Blumrosen and N. Nisan. On the computational power of iterative auctions I: Ascending auctions. In Proc. of the 6th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC), 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. S. Dobzinski. Private communication, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. S. Dobzinski and M. Schapira. An improved approximation algorithm for combinatorial auctions with submodular bidders. In Proc. of the 18rd Annual ACM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), 2006, 1064--1073. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. S. Dobzinski, N. Nisan and M. Schapira. Approximation algorithms for combinatorial auctions with complement-free bidders. In Proc. of the 37th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC), 2005, 610--618. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. U. Feige. On maximizing welfare when utility functions are subadditive. In Proc. of the 38th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC), 2006, 41--50. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. U. Feige and J. Vondrák. Approximation algorithms for combinatorial allocation problems:Improving the factor of 1--1/e. In Proc. of the 47th Annual IEEE Symposium on the Foundationsof Computer Science (FOCS), 2006, 667--676. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. U. Feige, V. Mirrokni and J. Vondrák. Maximizing non-monotone submodular functions. In Proc. of the 47th Annual IEEE Symposium on the Foundationsof Computer Science (FOCS), 2007, 461--471. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. R. Holzman, N. Kfir-Dahav, D. Monderer and M. Tennenholtz. Bundling equilibrium in combinatorial auctions. Games and Economic Behavior 47, 2004, 104--123.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. S. Khot, R. Lipton, E. Markakis and A. Mehta.Inapproximability results for combinatorialauctions with submodular utility functions. In Proc. of WINE 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. B. Lehmann, D. Lehmann and N. Nisan. Combinatorial auctions with decreasing marginal utilities In Proc. of the 3rd ACM Conferenceon Electronic Commerce (EC), 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. N. Nisan. Bidding and allocation in combinatorial auctions. In Proc. of the 2nd ACM Conferenceon Electronic Commerce (EC), 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. N. Nisan and I. Segal. The communication requirements of efficient allocations and supportingprices. Journal of Economic Theory, 129:1, 2006, 192--224.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. G. Nemhauser and M. Fisher, and L. Wolsey. An analysis of approximations for maximizing submodular set functions II. Math. Programming Study 8, 1978, 73--87.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. J. Vondrák. Optimal approximation for the Submodular Welfare Problemin the value oracle model. To appear in Proc. of the 40th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC), 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Tight information-theoretic lower bounds for welfare maximization in combinatorial auctions

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      EC '08: Proceedings of the 9th ACM conference on Electronic commerce
      July 2008
      332 pages
      ISBN:9781605581699
      DOI:10.1145/1386790

      Copyright © 2008 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 8 July 2008

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate664of2,389submissions,28%

      Upcoming Conference

      EC '24
      The 25th ACM Conference on Economics and Computation
      July 8 - 11, 2024
      New Haven , CT , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader