skip to main content
10.1145/1124772.1124916acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Talk to me: foundations for successful individual-group interactions in online communities

Published:22 April 2006Publication History

ABSTRACT

People come to online communities seeking information, encouragement, and conversation. When a community responds, participants benefit and become more committed. Yet interactions often fail. In a longitudinal sample of 6,172 messages from 8 Usenet newsgroups, 27% of posts received no response. The information context, posters' prior engagement in the community, and the content of their posts all influenced the likelihood that they received a reply, and, as a result, their willingness to continue active participation. Posters were less likely to get a reply if they were newcomers. Posting ontopic, introducing oneself via autobiographical testimonials, asking questions, using less complex language and other features of the messages, increased replies. Results suggest ways that developers might increase the ability of online communities to support successful individual-group interactions.

References

  1. Box, G.E.P., G.M. Jenkins, and G.C. Reinsel. Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control. 3rd ed. 1994: Prentice Hall. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Butler, B.S., Membership Size, Communication Activity, and Sustainability: A Resource-Based Model of Online Social Structures. Information Systems Research, 2001. 12(4): p. 346--362. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Butler, B.S., M.A. Smith, and T.C. Turner. Connectivity vs. Coherence: Boundary Tensions in Online Technical Discussion Communities. in Academy of Management Conference. 2004. New Orleans, LA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Carvalho, V.R. and W.W. Cohen. Learning to Extract Signature and Reply Lines from Email. Paper presented at the Conference on Email and AntiSpam. 2004. Mountain View, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Carvalho, V.R. and W.W. Cohen. On the collective classification of email speech acts. Paper presented at the SIGIR, 2005: Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 2005. Salvador, Brazil. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Cohen, W.W., Minorthird: Methods for Identifying Names and Ontological Relations in Text using Heuristics for Inducing Regularities from Data. 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Galegher, J., L. Sproull, and S. Kiesler, Legitimacy, authority, and community in electronic support groups. Written Communication, 1998. 15(4): p. 493--530.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Gouldner, A.W., The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 1960. 25(2): p. 161--178.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Herring, S., Interactional Coherence in CMC. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 1999. 4(4).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Jones, Q., S. Rafaeli, and G. Ravid, Information Overload and the Message Dynamics of Online Interaction Spaces: A Theoretical Model and Empirical Exploration. Information Systems Research, 2004. 15(2): p. 194--210. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Joyce, E. and R.E. Kraut, Loyalty: Predicting continued participation in newsgroups. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, Under review).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Karau, S.J. and K.D. Williams, Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 1993. 65(4): p. 681--706.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Katz, M.L. and C. Shapiro, Systems competition and network effects. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1994. 8(2): p. 93--115.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Kim, A.J., Community Building on the Web: Secret Strategies for Successful Online Communities. 2000, Berkeley, CA: Peachpit Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Lampe, C. and E. Johnston. Follow the (slash) dot: Effects of feedback on new members in an online community. in Group''05: Proceedings of the 2005 international ACM SIGGroup conference on supporting group work. 2005. New York, NY: ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Levine, J.M. and R.L. Moreland, Group socialization: Theory and research, in European review of social psychology, W.S.M. Hewstone, Editor. 1994, John Wiley & Sons: New York. p. 283--308.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Linde, C., The quantitative study of communicative success: Politeness and accidents in aviation discourse. Language in Society, 1988. 17: p. 375--399.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Mader, T.E. and D.C. Mader, Understanding one another. 2nd ed. 1993, Madison, Wisconsin: Brown and Benchmark Publishers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Markus, L., Towards a "critical mass" theory of interactive media: Universal access, interdependence, and diffusion. Communication Research, 1987. 14: p. 491--511.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. McQuillen, J.S., The Influence of Technology on the Initiation of Interpersonal Relationships. Education, 2003. 123(3): p. 616--624.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Millen, D.R. and J.F. Patterson. Stimulating Social Engagement in a Community Network. in Proceedings of the 2002 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. 2002. New Orleans, Louisiana, USA: ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Moreland, R.L. and J.M. Levine, Socialization in small groups: Temporal changes in individual-group relations, in Advances in experimental social psychology, L. Berkowitz, Editor. 1982, Academic Press: New York. p. 137--192.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Oliver, P.E. and G. Marwell, The paradox of group size in collective action: A theory of the critical mass. II. American Sociological Review, 1988. 53(1): p. 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Pennebaker, J.W., M.E. Francis, and R.J. Booth, Linguistic inquiry and word count. 2001, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Publishers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Pennebaker, J.W., M.R. Mehl, and K.G. Niederhoffer, Psychological aspects of natural language use: Our words, our selves. Annual Review of Psychology, 2003. 54: p. 547--577.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Porter, M.F., An algorithm for suffix stripping. Program, 1980. 14(3): p. 130--137.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Preece, J., ed. Online Communities: Designing Usability and Supporting Sociability. ed. J. Preece. 2000, John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY. 8--19. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Ridings, C. and D. Gefen, Virtual Community Attraction: Why People Hang Out Online. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2004. 10(1).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Sacks, H., G. Jefferson, and E. Schegloff, A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 1974. 50(4): p. 696--735.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Sassenberg, K., Common bond and common identity groups on the Internet: Attachment and normative behavior in on-topic and off-topic chats. Group Dynamics: Theory and Practice, 2002. 6(1): p. 27--37.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Smith, M.A., Measures and Maps of Usenet, in From Usenet to Cowebs: Interacting with Social Information, S.C. Leug and D. Fisher, Editors. 2003, Springer Verlag: Amsterdam, Holland. p. 47--78.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Smith, M.A., Netscan: A Social Accounting Search Engine (http://netscan.research.microsoft.com). 2004, Community Technologies Group, Microsoft Corporation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Whittaker, S., Terveen, L., Hill W., and Cherny, L., The Dynamics of Mass Interaction, in From Usenet to CoWebs: Interacting with Social Information, C. Leug and D. Fisher, Editors. 2003, Springer Verlag: Amsterdam, Holland. p. 79--91.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Zajonc, R.B., Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 1968. 9(2): p. 1--27.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Talk to me: foundations for successful individual-group interactions in online communities

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '06: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2006
      1353 pages
      ISBN:1595933727
      DOI:10.1145/1124772

      Copyright © 2006 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 22 April 2006

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader