skip to main content
10.1145/1099554.1099747acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Implicit user modeling for personalized search

Authors Info & Claims
Published:31 October 2005Publication History

ABSTRACT

Information retrieval systems (e.g., web search engines) are critical for overcoming information overload. A major deficiency of existing retrieval systems is that they generally lack user modeling and are not adaptive to individual users, resulting in inherently non-optimal retrieval performance. For example, a tourist and a programmer may use the same word "java" to search for different information, but the current search systems would return the same results. In this paper, we study how to infer a user's interest from the user's search context and use the inferred implicit user model for personalized search. We present a decision theoretic framework and develop techniques for implicit user modeling in information retrieval. We develop an intelligent client-side web search agent (UCAIR) that can perform eager implicit feedback, e.g., query expansion based on previous queries and immediate result reranking based on clickthrough information. Experiments on web search show that our search agent can improve search accuracy over the popular Google search engine.

References

  1. S. M. Beitzel, E. C. Jensen, A. Chowdhury, D. Grossman, and O. Frieder. Hourly analysis of a very large topically categorized web query log. In Proceedings of SIGIR 2004, pages 321--328, 2004.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. C. Clarke, N. Craswell, and I. Soboroff. Overview of the TREC 2004 terabyte track. In Proceedings of TREC 2004, 2004.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. M. Claypool, P. Le, M. Waseda, and D. Brown. Implicit interest indicators. In Proceedings of Intelligent User Interfaces 2001, pages 33--40, 2001.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. N. Craswell, D. Hawking, R. Wilkinson, and M. Wu. Overview of the TREC 2003 web track. In Proceedings of TREC 2003, 2003.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. W. B. Croft, S. Cronen-Townsend, and V. Larvrenko. Relevance feedback and personalization: A language modeling perspective. In Proeedings of Second DELOS Workshop: Personalisation and Recommender Systems in Digital Libraries, 2001.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Google Personalized. http://labs.google.com/personalized.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. D. Hawking, N. Craswell, P. B. Thistlewaite, and D. Harman. Results and challenges in web search evaluation. Computer Networks, 31(11-16):1321--1330, 1999.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. X. Huang, F. Peng, A. An, and D. Schuurmans. Dynamic web log session identification with statistical language models. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(14):1290--1303, 2004.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. G. Jeh and J. Widom. Scaling personalized web search. In Proceedings of WWW 2003, pages 271--279, 2003.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. T. Joachims. Optimizing search engines using clickthrough data. In Proceedings of SIGKDD 2002, pages 133--142, 2002.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. D. Kelly and J. Teevan. Implicit feedback for inferring user preference: A bibliography. SIGIR Forum, 37(2):18--28, 2003.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. J. Lafferty and C. Zhai. Document language models, query models, and risk minimization for information retrieval. In Proceedings of SIGIR'01, pages 111--119, 2001.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. T. Lau and E. Horvitz. Patterns of search: Analyzing and modeling web query refinement. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on User Modeling (UM), pages 145 --152, 1999.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. V. Lavrenko and B. Croft. Relevance-based language models. In Proceedings of SIGIR'01, pages 120--127, 2001.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. M. Mitra, A. Singhal, and C. Buckley. Improving automatic query expansion. In Proceedings of SIGIR 1998, pages 206--214, 1998.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. My Yahoo! http://mysearch.yahoo.com.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. G. Nunberg. As google goes, so goes the nation. New York Times, May 2003.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. S. E. Robertson. The probability ranking principle in ir. Journal of Documentation, 33(4):294--304, 1977.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. J. J. Rocchio. Relevance feedback in information retrieval. In The SMART Retrieval System: Experiments in Automatic Document Processing, pages 313--323. Prentice-Hall Inc., 1971.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. G. Salton and C. Buckley. Improving retrieval performance by retrieval feedback. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(4):288--297, 1990.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. G. Salton and M. J. McGill. Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval. McGraw-Hill, 1983.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. X. Shen, B. Tan, and C. Zhai. Context-sensitive information retrieval using implicit feedback. In Proceedings of SIGIR 2005, pages 43--50, 2005.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. X. Shen and C. Zhai. Exploiting query history for document ranking in interactive information retrieval (Poster). In Proceedings of SIGIR 2003, pages 377--378, 2003.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. A. Singhal. Modern information retrieval: A brief overview. Bulletin of the IEEE Computer Society Technical Committee on Data Engineering, 24(4):35--43, 2001.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. K. Sugiyama, K. Hatano, and M. Yoshikawa. Adaptive web search based on user profile constructed without any effort from users. In Proceedings of WWW 2004, pages 675--684, 2004.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. E. Volokh. Personalization and privacy. Communications of the ACM, 43(8):84--88, 2000.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. R. W. White, J. M. Jose, C. J. van Rijsbergen, and I. Ruthven. A simulated study of implicit feedback models. In Proceedings of ECIR 2004, pages 311--326, 2004.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. J. Xu and W. B. Croft. Query expansion using local and global document analysis. In Proceedings of SIGIR 1996, pages 4--11, 1996.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. C. Zhai and J. Lafferty. Model-based feedback in KL divergence retrieval model. In Proceedings of the CIKM 2001, pages 403--410, 2001.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Implicit user modeling for personalized search

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          CIKM '05: Proceedings of the 14th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management
          October 2005
          854 pages
          ISBN:1595931406
          DOI:10.1145/1099554

          Copyright © 2005 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 31 October 2005

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Article

          Acceptance Rates

          CIKM '05 Paper Acceptance Rate77of425submissions,18%Overall Acceptance Rate1,861of8,427submissions,22%

          Upcoming Conference

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader