Abstract
We study the K L and K S decays into four leptons (\(e\bar{e}e\bar{e}\), \(\mu\bar{\mu}\mu\bar{\mu}\), \(e\bar{e}\mu\bar{\mu}\)) where we use a form factor motivated by vector meson dominance, and show the dependence of the branching ratios and spectra from the slopes. A precise determination of short-distance contribution to K L →μμ is affected by our ignorance on the sign of the amplitude \(\mathcal{A}(K_{L}\to\gamma\gamma)\) but we show a possibility to measure the sign of this amplitude by studying K L and K S decays in four leptons. We also investigate the effect of New Physics contributions for these decays.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Numerically we have found that these effects generate α S and β S at \(\mathcal{O}(0.1)\), other effects are substantially smaller. Also we have checked that our parametrization of the off-shell photon behavior of \(\mathcal{O }(p^{4})\) of \(\mathcal{A}(K_{S}\to\gamma^{*}\gamma^{*}) \) from ref. [4] in terms of α S and β S reproduce well \(\operatorname{Br}(K_{S } \to4\ell)\) as described in ref. [8].
We are aware that we do a misuse of writing by exponentiating the amplitude since we do not prove any unitarization of the amplitudes as long as we consider only the first term. But it is quite obvious that faced with the smallness of the numbers, this cannot change a lot the conclusions.
References
R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 1301, 090 (2013)
R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 73, 2373 (2013)
T. Miyazaki, E. Takasugi, Phys. Rev. D 8, 2051–2062 (1973)
G. Ecker, A. Pich, Nucl. Phys. B 366, 189 (1991)
L. Cappiello, G. D’Ambrosio, M. Miragliuolo, Phys. Lett. B 298, 423 (1993)
A.G. Cohen, G. Ecker, A. Pich, Phys. Lett. B 304, 347 (1993)
J.L. Goity, L. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 57, 7031–7033 (1998)
W. Birkfellner, Diploma Thesis, Univ. of Vienna, 1996
V. Cirigliano, G. Ecker, H. Neufeld, A. Pich, J. Portoles, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 399 (2012)
G. D’Ambrosio, G. Isidori, J. Portolés, Phys. Rev. B 423, 385–394 (1998)
G. Isidori, R. Unterdorfer, J. High Energy Phys. 01, 009 (2004)
J. Beringer et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D 86, 010001 (2012)
G. D’Ambrosio, D. Espriu, Phys. Lett. B 175, 237 (1986)
J.L. Goity, Z. Phys. C 34, 341 (1987)
G. Buchalla, G. D’Ambrosio, G. Isidori, Nucl. Phys. B 672, 387 (2003)
N. Cabibbo, A. Maksymovicz, Phys. Rev. B 137, 438–443 (1965). Erratum, Phys. Rev. B 168, 1926 (1968)
G. D’Ambrosio, G. Isidori, A. Pugliese, N. Paver, Phys. Rev. D 50, 5767–5774 (1994)
P. Heiliger, L.M. Sehgal, Phys. Rev. D 48, 4146 (1993) [Erratum-ibid. 60, 079902 (1999)]
G. D’Ambrosio, G. Ecker, G. Isidori, H. Neufeld, hep-ph/9411439
G. D’Ambrosio, J. Portolés, Nucl. Phys. B 492, 417 (1997)
J.-M. Gerard, C. Smith, S. Trine, Nucl. Phys. B 730 (2005)
D. Gomez-Dumm, A. Pich, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 4663 (1998)
M. Knecht, S. Peris, M. Perrottet, E. de Rafael, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 5230 (1999)
L.M. Sehgal, J. van Leusen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4933 (1999)
L. Cappiello, O. Cata, G. D’Ambrosio, D.-N. Gao, Eur. Phys. J. C 72, 1872 (2012) [Erratum-ibid. 72, 2208 (2012)]
F.E. Low, Phys. Rev. 110, 974 (1958)
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank F. Ambrosino, O. Cata, P. Massarotti, J. Portolés for his careful reading of the manuscript, E. de Rafael and M.D. Sokoloff. G.D. acknowledges partial support by MIUR under project 2010YJ2NYW (SIMAMI). D.G.’s work is supported in part by the EU under Contract MTRN-CT-2006-035482 (FLAVIAnet) and by MUIR, Italy, under Project 2005-023102. G.V.’s research has been supported in part by the Spanish Government and ERDF funds from the EU Commission [grants FPA2007-60323, CSD2007-00042 (Consolider Project CPAN)].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix A: Detailed expressions for amplitudes
1.1 A.1 The K S decays amplitudes
For the cases where ℓ 1=ℓ 2, there exist four diagrams that can be reduced to two different amplitudes \(\mathcal{M}_{A}\) and \(\mathcal{M}_{B}\) (Fig. 7),
and
Thus the total squared amplitude is given by (under symmetries considerations, \(|\mathcal{M}_{A}|^{2} = |\mathcal{M}_{B}|^{2} \)),
In the mixed case, ℓ 1=μ and ℓ 2=e, there are only two diagrams, and we have \(|\mathcal{M}|^{2}=|\mathcal{M}_{A}|^{2}\).
1.2 A.2 The K L decays amplitudes
The calculations of the amplitudes involving the K L are identical in procedure that the ones for the K S , we have to distinguish two kinds of amplitudes
and
The total amplitude is given by (under symmetries considerations, \(|\mathcal{M}_{A}|^{2} = |\mathcal{M}_{B}|^{2} \)),
As before, in the mixed case, ℓ 1=μ and ℓ 2=e, there are only two diagrams, and we have \(|\mathcal{M}|^{2}=|\mathcal{M}_{A}|^{2}\).
Appendix B: Bremsstrahlung CP-violating part
Using Low’s theorem [26], the amplitude \(K_{S} (q)\to \mu (p_{-}) \bar{\mu} (p_{+}) \gamma^{*} (k)\) is the product of the \(K_{S} (q)\to \mu (p_{-}) \bar{\mu} (p_{+})\) amplitude times the contribution of the soft photon radiated (Fig. 8):
where \(\mathcal{M}(K_{S} \to\mu\bar{\mu})\) is the decay amplitude of K S into two muons
and
Now, we just have to contract with the muonic current \(-i e \bar {u}\gamma^{\nu}v\;\epsilon^{*}_{\nu}\) to obtain the Bremsstrahlung contribution
In our case, \(\operatorname{Re} \mathcal{A}_{SD} \) can be neglected, all the short-distance information is contained in \(\operatorname{Im} \mathcal {A}_{SD} \) and we have [11]:
with \(x_{t}=m_{t}^{2}/M_{W}^{2}\) and Y(x) is the Inami–Lin function:
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
D’Ambrosio, G., Greynat, D. & Vulvert, G. Standard model and new physics contributions to K L and K S into four leptons. Eur. Phys. J. C 73, 2678 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-013-2678-1
Received:
Revised:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-013-2678-1