Abstract
The atomic model introduced by Bohr in 1913 dominated the development of the old quantum theory. Its main features, such as the radiationless stationary states and the discontinuous quantum jumps between the states, were hard to swallow for contemporary physicists. While acknowledging the empirical power of the theory, many scientists criticized its foundation or looked for ways to reconcile it with classical physics. Among the chief critics were A. Crehore, J.J. Thomson, E. Gehrcke and J. Stark. This paper examines from a historical perspective the conceptual objections to Bohr’s atom, in particular the stationary states (where electrodynamics was annulled by fiat) and the mysterious, apparently teleological quantum jumps. Although few of the critics played a constructive role in the development of the old quantum theory, a history neglecting their presence would be incomplete and distorted.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arabatzis, Theodore. 2006. Representing Electrons: A Biographical Approach to Theoretical Entities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Benz, Ulrich. 1975. Arnold Sommerfeld: Lehrer und Forscher and der Schwelle zum Atomzeitalter. Stuttgart: Wissenschaftlicher Verlagsgesellschaft
Bohr, Niels. 1913. On the constitution of atoms and molecules. Philos. Mag. 26: 1–25; 476–502; 857–875
Bohr, Niels. 1915. On the quantum theory of radiation and the structure of the atom. Philos. Mag. 30: 394–415
Bohr, Niels. 1918. On the quantum theory of line-spectra, Part I: On the general theory. Kgl. Danske Videnskabernes Skrifter, Naturvidenskabelig og Mathematisk Afdeling, 8. Række IV.1
Bohr, Niels. 1922. The Theory of Spectra and Atomic Constitution, translated by A.D. Udden. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Bohr, Niels. 1923a. The structure of the atom. Nature 112: 29–44
Bohr, Niels 1923b. The effect of electric and magnetic fields on spectral lines. Proc. Phys. Soc. 25: 275–302
Bohr, Niels 1924. On the application of the quantum theory to atomic structure. Part I: The fundamental postulates. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. (Suppl.) 22: 1–44
Born, Max. 1971. The Born-Einstein Letters. London: Macmillan
Brillouin, Marcel. 1919. Actions mécaniques à hérédité discontinue par propagation; essai de théorie dynamique de l’atome à quanta. Comptes Rendus 168: 1318–1320
Campbell, Norman R. 1913. Modern Electrical Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Crehore, Albert C. 1921. An atomic model based on electromagnetic theory. Philos. Mag. 42: 569–593
Darrigol, Olivier. 1992. From c-Numbers to q-Numbers: The Classical Analogy in the History of Quantum Theory. Berkeley: University of California Press
Darrigol, Olivier. 1997. Classical concepts in Bohr’s atomic theory (1913–1925). Physis 34: 545–567
Eckert, Michael and Karl Märker. 2000. Arnold Sommerfeld. Wissenschaftlicher Briefwechsel, Vol. 1. Berlin: Verlag für Geschichte der Naturwissenschaften und der Technik
Eckert, Michael and Karl Märker. 2004. Arnold Sommerfeld. Wissenschaftlicher Briefwechsel, Vol. 2. Berlin: Verlag für Geschichte der Naturwissenschaften und der Technik
Epstein, Paul S. 1918. Anwendungen der Quantenlehre in der Theorie der Serienspektren. Naturwissenschaften 17: 230–253
Eve, Arthur S. 1939. Rutherford. Being the Life and Letters of the Rt Hon. Lord Rutherford, O.M. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Favrholdt, David. 1999. Niels Bohr. Collected Works, Vol. 10. Amsterdam: North-Holland
Fujisaki, Chiyoko. 1982. P. Drude’s theory of dispersion of light and atom model (1900–1913). Hist. Scient. 22: 19–68
Gehrcke, Ernst. 1914. Über ein Modell zur Erklärung der Lichtemission. Phys. Zs. 15: 123–127
Gehrcke, Ernst. 1920. Über ein Modell zur Erklärung der Lichtemission, V. Phys. Zs. 21: 172–175
Heilbron, John L. and Thomas S. Kuhn. 1969. The genesis of the Bohr atom. Hist. Stud. Phys. Sci. 1: 211–290
Hicks, William M. 1914. Discussion on the structure of atoms and molecules. Brit. Ass. Adv. Sci., Report, 296–299
Holton, Gerald. 1970. The roots of complementarity. Dædalus 99: 1015–1055
Hoyer, Ulrich. 1981. Niels Bohr. Collected Works, Vol. 2. Amsterdam: North-Holland
Jammer, Max. 1966. The Conceptual Development of Quantum Mechanics. New York: McGraw-Hill
Jeans, James. 1913. Discussion on radiation. Brit. Ass. Adv. Sci., Report, 376–386
Klein, Martin J. 1970. Paul Ehrenfest. Vol. 1: The Making of a Theoretical Physicist. Amsterdam: North-Holland
Kojima, Chieko. 2004. La physique Français avant Louis de Broglie. Ann. Fond. Louis de Broglie 29: 767–783
Kragh, Helge. 1985. The fine structure of hydrogen and the gross structure of the physics community, 1916–26. Hist. Stud. Phys. Sci. 16: 67–125
Kragh, Helge. 2011. Resisting the Bohr atom: The early British opposition. Phys. Persp. 13: 4–35
Kramers, Hendrik A. and Helge Holst. 1923. The Atom and the Bohr Theory of its Structure: An Elementary Presentation. London: Gyldendal
Kuhn, Thomas S. 1978. Black-Body Theory and the Quantum Discontinuity, 1894–1912. Oxford: Clarendon Press
Larmor, Joseph. 1897. On the theory of the magnetic influence on spectra; and on the radiation from moving ions. In Larmor, Mathematical and Physical Papers, Vol. 2, 1929, pp. 140–149. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Lewis, Gilbert N. 1916. The atom and the molecule. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 38: 762–785
Lewis, Gilbert N. 1917. The static atom. Science 46: 297–302
Lewis, Gilbert N. 1923. Valence and the Structure of Atoms and Molecules. New York: Chemical Catalog Company
Lorentz, Hendrik A. 1922. On Whittaker’s quantum mechanism in the atom. Proc. Roy. Acad. Amsterdam 31: 414–422
Mehra, Jagdish and Helmut Rechenberg. 1982. The Historical Development of Quantum Theory, Vol. 1. New York: Springer
Meyenn, Karl von. 2011. Eine Entdeckung von ganz Ausserordentlicher Tragweite: Schrödinger’s Briefwechsel zur Wellenmechanik und zum Katzenparadoxon. Heidelberg: Springer
Nisio, Sigeko. 1973. The formation of the Sommerfeld theory of 1916. Jap. Stud. Hist. Sci. 12: 39–78
Oseen, Carl W. 1915. Das Bohrsche Atommodell und die Maxwellschen Gleichungen. Phys. Zs. 16: 395–405
Page, Leigh. 1922. Radiation from a group of electrons. Phys. Rev. 20: 18–25
Page, Leigh. 1925. The Balmer law as an equation of motion. Phys. Rev. 23: 429–443
Pais, Abraham. 1991. Niels Bohr’s Times, in Physics, Philosophy, and Polity. Oxford: Clarendon Press
Petruccioli, Sandro. 1993. Atoms, Metaphors and Paradoxes: Niels Bohr and the Construction of a New Physics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Planck, Max. 1915. Bemerkungen über die Emission von Spektrallinien. Sitzungsb. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin, 909–913
Reid, Constance. 1976. Courant in Göttingen and New York. The Story of an Improbable Mathematician. New York: Springer-Verlag
Riecke, Eduard. 1915. Bohrs Theorie der Serienspektren von Wasserstoff und Helium. Phys. Zs. 16: 222–227
Robertson, Peter. 1979. The Early Years: The Niels Bohr Institute 1921–1930. Copenhagen: Akademisk Forlag
Robotti, Nadia. 1983. The spectrum of ξ Puppis and the historical evolution of empirical data. Hist. Stud. Phys. Sci. 14: 123–146
Rud Nielsen, Jens. 1972. Niels Bohr. Collected Works, Vol. 1. Amsterdam: North-Holland
Rud Nielsen, Jens. 1976. Niels Bohr. Collected Works, Vol. 3. Amsterdam: North-Holland
Russell, Bertrand. 1923. The ABC of Atoms. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul
Schott, George A. 1918. On Bohr’s hypothesis of stationary states of motion and the radiation from an accelerated electron. Philos. Mag. 36: 243–261
Silberstein, Ludwik. 1920. Report on the Quantum Theory of Spectra. London: Adam Hilger
Smekal, Adolf. 1921. Über Stark’s Kritik der Bohrschen Theorie der Lichtemission. Verh. Deutsch. Phys. Gesells. 2: 20–22
Sommerfeld, Arnold. 1921. Zur Kritik der Bohrschen Theorie der Licht-Emission. Jahrb. Rad. Elektr. 17: 417–429
Sommerfeld, Arnold. 1924. Grundlagen der Quantentheorie und des Bohrschen Atommodelles. Naturwissenschaften 12: 1047–1049
Stark, Johannes. 1914. Elektrische Spektralanalyse Chemischer Atome. Leipzig: Hirzel
Stark, Johannes. 1916. Tatsachen und Folgerungen über Zahl und Koppelung von Elektronen im Wasserstoffatom. Ann. Phys. 50: 53–88
Stark, Johannes. 1917. Erfahrung und Bohrsche Theorie der Wasserstoffspektren. Ann. Phys. 54: 111–116
Stark, Johannes. 1920. Zur Kritik der Bohrschen Theorie der Lichtemission. Jahrb. Rad. Elektr. 17: 161–173
Stark, Johannes. 1922. Die Gegenwärtige Krisis in der Deutschen Physik. Leipzig: J. A. Barth
Stark, Johannes. 1930. Die Kausalität im Verhalten des Elektrons. Ann. Phys. 6: 681–699
Stark, Johannes. 1945. Erinnerungen eines Deutschen Naturforschers, edited and annotated by Andreas Kleinert. Mannheim: Bionomica-Verlag
Stolzenburg, Klaus. 1984. Niels Bohr. Collected Works, Vol. 5. Amsterdam: North-Holland
Thomson, Joseph J. 1919. On the origin of spectra and Planck’s law. Philos. Mag. 37: 419–446
Tolman, Richard C. 1922. Review of the present status of the two forms of quantum theory. J. Opt. Soc. Am. Rev. Sci. Instr. 6: 211–228
Warburg, Emil. 1913. Bemerkungen zu der Aufspaltung der Spektrallinien im elektrischen Feld. Verh. Deutsch. Physik. Gesells. 15: 1259–1266
Warwick, Andrew. 1993. Frequency, theorem and formula: Remembering Joseph Larmor in electromagnetic theory. Notes and Records Roy. Soc. 47: 49–60
Wereide, Thorstein. 1915. Statistical Theory of Energy and Matter. Oslo: Gyldendal
Wereide, Thorstein. 1917. Maxwells Gleichungen und die Atomstrahlung. Ann. Phys. 52: 276–282
Whittaker, Edmund T. 1922. On the quantum mechanism in the atom. Proc. Roy. Soc., Edinburgh 42: 129–146
Wien, Wilhelm. 1915. Theorie der Wärmestrahlung. In Physik, Part 3.3.1 of Die Kultur der Gegenwart, edited by Emil Warburg, pp. 209–222. Leipzig: B.G. Teubner
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kragh, H. Conceptual objections to the Bohr atomic theory — do electrons have a “free will” ?. EPJ H 36, 327–352 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjh/e2011-20031-x
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjh/e2011-20031-x