Article Text

Download PDFPDF

A pneumonia leading to blindness
Free
  1. Yvonne Nussbaumer-Ochsner1,
  2. Barbara Katharina Hasse2,
  3. Christophe Valmaggia3,
  4. Martin Krause4
  1. 1Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Cantonal Hospital of Muensterlingen, Muensterlingen, Switzerland
  2. 2Division of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
  3. 3Department of Ophthalmology, Cantonal Hospital of St Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland
  4. 4Department of Internal Medicine, Cantonal Hospital of Muensterlingen, Muensterlingen, Switzerland
  1. Correspondence to Dr Yvonne Nussbaumer-Ochsner, yvonne.nussbaumer{at}hispeed.ch

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Description

A 56-year-old man with oesophageal/pyloric stenosis after a suicide attempt with toilet detergent was treated with tazobactam/piperacillin followed by oral levofloxacin for aspiration pneumonia in the right lower field. Seven days later, bilateral chemosis and conjunctival hyperaemia developed (figure 1), followed by right eye blindness and reduced light perception in the left eye. A sinus thrombosis or sinusitis was excluded by CT scan. Diagnosis of bilateral endophthalmitis was made followed by left pars plana vitrectomy, intravitreal vancomycin/ceftazidime and parenteral cefepime application. Blood and vitreous cultures revealed Klebsiella pneumoniae, fully sensitive to levofloxacin. Vitreous cultures were only intermediately susceptible to tazobactam/piperacillin in contrast to blood cultures. After 4 weeks, pan-endophthalmitis subsided without visual recovery. During the course, evisceration of the amaurotic right eye was necessary due to secondary glaucoma.

Figure 1

Severe chemosis and conjunctival hyperaemia of the right eye.

Endogenous endophthalmitis results from the haematogenous spread of bacteria or fungi to the eye from an infectious focus at a distant site.1 ,2 It is a medical emergency requiring vitrectomy, and administration of intravitreal and systemic antibiotics targeting the cause of bacteraemia. In Asia, Gram-negative organisms are most common (Neisseria meningitidis, Haemophilus influenzae, Escherchia coli and Klebsiella spp), while for the majority of cases outside Asia, Gram-positive organisms are responsible (Streptococcus spp, Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus spp). Low intravitreous drug concentrations after systemic administration facilitate the development of antibiotic resistance and may explain only intermediate susceptibility to tazobactam/piperacillin in the vitreous cultures in our case. Diabetes mellitus is the most common risk factor, and was also present in our patient.3 Even with adequate treatment and early recognition, visual prognosis is poor.

Learning points

  • Endogenous endophthalmitis results from the haematogenous spread of bacteria or fungi to the eye as a consequence of an infectious focus at a distant site. It is a clinical diagnosis that is confirmed by positive aqueous or vitreous cultures.

  • The term endophthalmitis refers to intraocular inflammation predominantly involving the vitreous cavity and the anterior chamber of the eye. Contiguous ocular structures such as the retina or the choroid may also be involved.

  • Endophthalmitis is a medical emergency. Treatment should include vitrectomy with intravitreal injection of antibiotics and systemic antibiotics targeting the cause of bacteraemia. Even when adequate treatment is established, early visual prognosis for patients is generally poor, leading to blindness in the affected eye.

References

View Abstract

Footnotes

  • Contributors All authors have seen and approved the manuscript. YN-O was responsible for selecting data and manuscript writing and takes full responsibility for the manuscript. BKH, CV and MK were responsible for reviewing the manuscript.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.