Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparative Analysis of the Efficiency of Chicken and Rabbit Antibodies in Competitive Enzyme Linked Immunoassay for the Detection of Bovine Beta-Casomorphin 7

  • Published:
Applied Biochemistry and Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rabbit and chicken (IgY) polyclonal antibodies were compared with respect to their performance in competitive enzyme linked immunoassays (ELISA) for the determination of opioid peptide β-casomorphin 7 (BCM-7) released from variant A1 of bovine β-casein. To obtain antibodies, the animals (four rabbits and four hens) were immunized (with similar regimes) with BCM-7 conjugated to bovine serum albumin. Comparison of the binding curves of biotinylated BCM-7 obtained with affinity-purified mammalian and avian antibodies immobilized on the surface of polystyrene microtiter immunoplates via passive adsorption (in optimal conditions) showed that rabbit antibodies captured biotinylated antigen 100 times more efficiently than hen antibodies within the given antibody panel. The most efficient rabbit antibodies were used to construct a highly sensitive, competitive ELISA for the detection of BCM-7 (the minimal detection limit was 0.2 ng/mL). The chicken antibodies proved unsuitable for such use due to their low affinity. These results indicate that it is necessary to make comparisons with methods based on mammalian antibodies in the construction of quantitative ELISA based on chicken polyclonal antibodies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Schade, R., Calzado, E.G., Sarmiento, R., Chacana, P.A., Porankiewicz-Asplund, J., and Terzolo, H.R., Altern. Lab. Anim., 2005, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 129–154.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Tambourgi, D.V., Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol., 2010, vol. 135, nos. 3–4, pp. 173–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Spillner, E., Braren, I., Greunke, K., Seismann, H., Blank, S., and Plessis, D., Biologicals, 2012, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 313–322.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lee, W., Syed, AtifA., Tan, S.C., and Leow, C.H., J. Immunol. Methods, 2017, vol. 447, pp. 71–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Júnior, F.Á., dos Pacheco, S.J., de Oliveira, S.I., Alves, M.A., Leonel, E.G., and Rodrigues, R.I., Ciencia Rural, 2018, vol. 48, no. 8. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20180250

  6. Łupicka-Słowik, A., Walczak, M., Grzywa, R., Bobrek, K., Łęcka, M., Boivin, S., Gaweł, A., Stefaniak, T., Oleksyszyn, J., and Sieńczyk, M., Bioanalysis, vol. 6, no. 23, pp. 3197–3213.

  7. Xiao, Y., Gao, X., Gannot, G., Emmert-Buck, M.R., Srivastava, S., Wagner, P.D., Amos, M.D., and Barke-r, P.E., Int. J. Cancer, 2008, vol. 122, no. 10, pp. 2178–2186.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kuronen, I., Kokko, H., Mononen, I., and Parviainen, M., Eur. J. Clin. Chem. Clin. Biochem., 1997, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 435– 440.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Di Lonardo, A., Marcante, M.L., Poggiali, F., Hamsoikova, E., and Venuti, A., Arch. Virol., 2001, vol. 146, no. 1, pp. 117–125.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. de Paula, V.S., Silva AdosS., de Vasconcelos, G.A., Iff, E.T., Silva, M.E., Kappel, L.A., Cruz, P.B., and Pinto, M.A., J. Virol. Methods, 2011, vol. 171, no. 1, pp. 102–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nafea, N.M., Sabbah, M.A., Al-Suhail, R., Mahdavi, A.H., and Asgary, S., Adv. Biomed. Res., 2015, vol. 4, p. 100. https://doi.org/10.4103/2277-9175.156678

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Almeida, C.M.C., Quintana-Flores, V.M., Medina-Acosta, E., Schriefer, A., Barral-Netto, M., and Dias da Silva, W., Scand. J. Immunol., 2003, vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 573–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chalghoumi, R., Théwis, A., Portetelle, D., and Beckers, Y., Poult. Sci., 2008, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 32–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Meenatchisundaram, S., Shanmugam, V., and Anjali, V.M., J. Basic. Clin. Pharm., 2011, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 109–114.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Ferreira Júnior, Á., Santiago, F.M, Silva, M.V, Ferreira, F.B, Macêdo Júnior, A.G, Mota, C.M, Faria, M.S, Silva Filho, H.H., Silva, D.A, Cunha-Júnior, J.P., Mineo, J.R., and Mineo, T.W., PLoS One, 2012, vol. 7, no. 7. e40391. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040391

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Lei, J.H., Su, B.T., Xu, H., Shen, J.L., Guan, X.H., Feng, Z.Q., Li, Y.L., Xu, M.X., and Liu, W.Q., Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 2011, vol. 85, no. 6, pp. 1054–1059.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Matsuda, H., Mitsuda, H., Nakamura, N., Furusawa, S., Mohri, S., and Kitamoto, T., FEMS Immunol. Med. M-icrobiol., 1999, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 189–194.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Pechelyulko, A.A., Tarakanova, Yu.N., Dmitriev, D.A., Massino, Yu.S., Segal, O.L., Lavrov, V.F., and Dmitriev, A.D., Appl. Biochem. Microbiol., 2017, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 114–122.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kost, N.V., Sokolov, O.Y., Kurasova, O.B., Dmitriev, A.D., Tarakanova, J.N., Gabaeva, M.V., Zolotarev, Y.A., Dadayan, A.K., Grachev, S.A., Korneeva, E.V., Mikheeva, I.G., and Zozulya, A.A., Peptides, 2009, vol. 30, no. 10, pp. 1854–1860.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Pardue, H.L., Clin. Chem., 1997, vol. 43, no. 10, pp. 1831–1837.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Dmitriev, A.D., Tarakanova, J.N., Yakovleva, D.A., Dmitriev, D.A., Phartooshnaya, O.V., Kolyaskina, G.I., Massino, Y.S., Borisova, O.V., Segal, O.L., Smir-nova, M.B., Ulanova, T.I., and Lavrov, V.F., J. Immunoassay Immunochem., 2013, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 414–437.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Tarakanova, Yu.N., Dmitriev, A.D., Massino, Yu.S., Pechelyul’ko, A.A., Segal, O.L., Skoblov, Yu.S., Ulanova, T.I., Lavrov, V.F., and Dmitriev, D.A., Appl. Biochem. Microbiol., 2015, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 462–469.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Li, D., Cui, Y., Morisseau, C., Gee, S.J., Bever, C.S., Liu, X., Wu, J., Hammock, B.D., and Ying, Y., Anal. Chem., 2017, vol. 89, no. 11, pp. 6248–6256.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Butler, J.E., in Methods in Molecular Medicine: Molecular Diagnosis of Infectious Diseases, Decker, J. and Reischl, U., Eds., Totowa, N. J.: Humana Press Inc., 2004, pp. 333–372.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Küllenberg de Gaudry, D., Lohner, S., Schmucker, C., Kapp, P., Motschall, E., Hörrlein, S., Röger, C., and Meerpohl, J.J., Nutr. Rev., 2019, vol. 77, no. 5, pp. 278–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Yannakis, J. and Ozimek, L., Milchwissenschaft, 1998, vol. 53, no. 8, pp. 436–440.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Yannakis, J., Development of IgY antibodies in egg-yolk against beta-casomorphin-7, A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research for the Degree of Master of Science, Canada, University of Alberta, 1997.

  28. Kaufman, J., Trends Immunol., 2018, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 367–379.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Derbinski, J., Pinto, S., Rosch, S., Hexel, K., and Kyewski, B., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2008, vol. 105, no. 2, pp. 657–662.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Enjapoori, A.K., Kukuljan, S., Dwyer, K.M., and Sharp, J.A., Nutrition, 2019, vol. 57, pp. 259–267.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Lonnerdal, B., Bergstrom, S., Andersson, Y., Hjalmarsson, K., Sundqvist, A.K., and Hernell, O., FEBS Lett., 1990, vol. 269, no. 1, pp. 153– 156.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Mechnikov Scientific Research Institute of Vaccines and Sera, 105064, Moscow, Russia

    A. A. Pechelyulko, Y. N. Tarakanova, D. A. Dmitriev, Y. S. Massino, O. L. Segal & A. D Dmitriev

  2. Shemyakin–Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, 117997, Moscow, Russia

    V. Y. Kost & E. A. Rogozhin

  3. Gause Institute of New Antibiotics, 119021, Moscow, Russia

    E. A. Rogozhin

Authors
  1. A. A. Pechelyulko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Y. N. Tarakanova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. D. A. Dmitriev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Y. S. Massino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. V. Y. Kost
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. E. A. Rogozhin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. O. L. Segal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. A. D Dmitriev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. D Dmitriev.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Statement on Animal Welfare. All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

Additional information

Translated by M. Novikova

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pechelyulko, A.A., Tarakanova, Y.N., Dmitriev, D.A. et al. Comparative Analysis of the Efficiency of Chicken and Rabbit Antibodies in Competitive Enzyme Linked Immunoassay for the Detection of Bovine Beta-Casomorphin 7. Appl Biochem Microbiol 55, 704–710 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0003683819060103

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0003683819060103

Keywords:

Search

Navigation