Department of Urology, Tokai University, School of Medicine
Department of Urology, Tokai University, School of Medicine
Department of Urology, Tokai University, School of Medicine
Department of Urology, Tokai University, School of Medicine
Department of Urology, Tokai University, School of Medicine
Department of Urology, Tokai University, School of Medicine
Department of Urology, Tokai University, School of Medicine
Department of Urology, Tokai University, School of Medicine
Department of Urology, Tokai University, School of Medicine
Department of Urology, Tokai University, School of Medicine
Department of Urology, Sapporo Medical College
Department of Urology, Sapporo Medical College
Department of Urology, Tomakomai Oji Hospital
Department of Urology, Akita University, School of Medicine
Department of Urology, Akita University, School of Medicine
Department of Urology, Akita University, School of Medicine
Department of Urology, Akita Municipal Hospital
Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine University of Tokyo
Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine University of Tokyo
Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine University of Tokyo
Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine University of Tokyo
Department of Urology, Mitsui Memorial Hospital
Department of Urology, Mitsui Memorial Hospital
Department of Urology, Tokyo Kyosai Hospital
Department of Urology, Tokyo Metropolitan Toshima Hospital
Department of Urology, Tokyo Metropolitan Aoyama Hospital
Department of Urology, Toranomon Hospital
Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine
Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine
Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine
Department of Urology, Tachikawa Kyosai Hospital
Department of Urology, Tachikawa Kyosai Hospital
Department of Urology, Tachikawa Kyosai Hospital
Department of Urology, Tachikawa Kyosai Hospital
Department of Urology, Kawasaki Municipal Hospital
Department of Urology, Hiratsuka Municipal Hospital
Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Kanazawa University
Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Kanazawa University
Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Kanazawa University
Department of Urology, Takaoka Koseiren General Hospital
Department of Urology, Fujita Gakuen University
Department of Urology, Fujita Gakuen University
Department of Urology, Fujita Gakuen University
Department of Urology, Fujita Gakuen University
Department of Urology, Fujita Gakuen University
Department of Urology, Shizuoka Red Cross Hospital
Department of Urology, Shizuoka Red Cross Hospital
Department of Urology, Nerima General Hospital
Department of Urology, Gifu University School of Medicine
Department of Urology, Gifu University School of Medicine
Department of Urology, Gifu University School of Medicine
Department of Urology, Gifu University School of Medicine
Department of Urology, Takayama Red Cross Hospital
Department of Urology, Takayama Red Cross Hospital
Department of Urology, Gero Hot Spring Hospital
Department of Urology, Ohgaki City Hospital
Department of Urology, Ohgaki City Hospital
Department of Urology, Nagahama Red Cross Hospital
Department of Urology, Nagahama Red Cross Hospital
Department of Urology, Kyoto University School of Medicine
Department of Urology, Kyoto University School of Medicine
Department of Urology, Kobe University, School of Medicine
Department of Urology, Kobe University, School of Medicine
Department of Urology, Kobe University, School of Medicine
Department of Urology, Kobe University, School of Medicine
Department of Urology, Akashi Municipal Hospital
Department of Urology, Akashi Municipal Hospital
Department of Urology, Hyogo Prefectural Kakogawa Hospital
Department of Urology, Hyogo Prefectural Kakogawa Hospital
Department of Urology, Nishiwaki Municipal Hospital
Department of Urology, Nishiwaki Municipal Hospital
Department of Urology, Nishiwaki Municipal Hospital
Department of Urology, Himeji Red Cross Hospita
Department of Urology, Himeji Red Cross Hospita
Department of Urology, Okayama University Medical School
Department of Urology, Okayama University Medical School
Department of Urology, Okayama Red Cross Hospital
Department of Urology, Okayama City Hospital
Department of Urology, Okayama Saiseikai Hospital
Department of Urology, Tamano City Hospital
Department of Urology, Tsuyama Central Hospital
Department of Urology, Kasaoka City Hospital
Department of Urology, Kobe Western Municipal Hospital
Department of Urology, Hiroshima University School of Medicine
Department of Urology, Hiroshima University School of Medicine
Department of Urology, Koseiren Onomichi General Hospital
Department of Urology, Koseiren Onomichi General Hospital
Department of Urology, Koseiren Onomichi General Hospital
Department of Urology, School of Medicine, The University of Tokushima
Department of Urology, School of Medicine, The University of Tokushima
Department of Urology, School of Medicine, The University of Tokushima
Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Kyushu University
Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Kyushu University
Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Kyushu University
Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Kurume University
Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Kurume University
Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Saga Medical School
Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Saga Medical School
Department of Urology, Saga National Hospital
Department of Urology, Saga National Hospital
Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagoshima University
Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagoshima University
Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagoshima University
Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagoshima University
Division of Urology, Kagoshima City Hospital
Division of Urology, Kagoshima City Hospital
Division of Urology, Saga Prefectural Hospital
Division of Urology, Saga Prefectural Hospital
Division of Urology, Miyakonojyo National Hospital
Division of Urology, Miyakonojyo National Hospital
Institute of Anaerobic Bacteriology, Gifu University School of Medicine
1984 Volume 58 Issue 9 Pages 862-893
(compatible with EndNote, Reference Manager, ProCite, RefWorks)
(compatible with BibDesk, LaTeX)
The clinical efficacy, safety and usefulness of Ceftazidime (CAZ) in complicated urinary tract infectionswere evaluated in comparison with Cefoperazone (CPZ) in double blind manner, and thefollowing results were obtained.
CAZ 1g/day, CAZ 2g/day or CPZ 2g/day was administered by intravenous drip infusion twice dailyfor 5 days.
In the overall clinical efficacy evaluation according to the criteria proposed by UTI committee in Japan, the efficacy rates were 63% in 125 cases in the CAZ 1g/day group, 68% in 119 cases in the CAZ 2g/day group and 52% in 119 cases in the CPZ 2g/day group, with no significant difference among thethree groups (H-test). When 2 groups were compared (X2-test), however, the CAZ 2g/day was shown tobe superior over CPZ .2 g/day with statistically significant difference. As to the clinical efficacy classifiedby the type of infections, CAZ (both 1g/day and 2g/day) was more effective than CPZ (2g/day) withstatistically significant difference in polymicrobial infections. It was noteworthy that in the G-5 group, CAZ 1g/day was significantly better than CPZ 2g/day.
The elimination rates in bacteriuria were 53%, 52% and 45%, in CAZ 1g/day, CAZ 2g/day and CPZ 2g/day, and the clearance rates in pyuria were 35%, 33% and 23%, respectively, with no significantdifference among the three groups. In the clearance + decrease rates, however, the CAZ 1g/day and CAZ 2g/day groups showed better results than CPZ 2g/day group with statistically significantdifference.In the bacteriological response, CAZ 1g/day and 2g/day showed statistically higher eradicationrates than CPZ 2g/day in the total number of organisms and gram negative bacteria, but in gram positivebacteria, CPZ 2g/day showed higher eradication rates than CAZ 1g/day with statistically significantdifference. When reviewed for each organism, CAZ 1g/day and 2g/day showed higher eradication ratesthan CPZ 2g/day in S. marcescens with statistically significant difference; however, there was nosignificant difference among the three groups in the other organisms. Number of organisms whichemerged after treatment was large with S. faecalis and Yeast-like organisms in all the three groups. No severe adverse reaction or abnormal laboratory finding was observed in any group; therefore, there was no significant difference among the three groups. From the above results, CAZ was judged to be an antibiotic with clinical usefulness equal to, or evenhigher than that of CPZ.