Skip to main content
Log in

Structure and Function of the Healing Medial Collateral Ligament in a Goat Model

  • Published:
Annals of Biomedical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study knee joint function with a healing medial collateral ligament (MCL) at six weeks was examined with a robotic/universal force-moment sensor testing system during the application of two loading conditions: (1) 5 N m valgus moment and (2) 67 N anterior load. Additionally the structural properties of the femur–MCL–tibia complex and the mechanical properties of the MCL substance were determined by uniaxial tensile tests. The histological appearance of the healing MCL was also observed. At 30° and 60° of knee flexion, valgus rotation of the healing knee was significantly increased compared to the sham. The in situ force in the healing MCL was significantly lower (34±17 N vs 54±12 N) at the same flexion angles (50±10 N vs 62±7 N). The anterior translation of the knee had returned to normal values at 30° and 60° of knee flexion. However, no differences could be found between the corresponding in situ forces in the healing MCL at all flexion angles examined during application of an anterior load. The stiffness of the healing group (52.5±19.4 N/mm) was significantly lower than the sham group (80.3±26.4 N/mm) (p < 0.04). The modulus of the healing group was also significantly decreased (p < 0.05). The findings suggest that the tensile properties of the healing goat MCL and valgus knee rotation have not returned to normal at six weeks after an isolated MCL rupture, however, anterior translation appeared to return to sham levels. © 2001 Biomedical Engineering Society.

PAC01: 8719St

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Ballmer, P. M., and R. P. Jakob. The nonoperative treatment of isolated complete tears of the medial collateral ligament of the knee. A prospective study. Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. 107:273–276, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cooper, R. R., and S. Misol. Tendon and ligament insertion: A light and electron microscopic study. J. Bone Jt. Surg., Am. Vol. 52:1–20, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ellsasser, J. C., F. C. Reynolds, and J. R. Omohundro. The nonoperative treatment of collateral ligament injuries of the knee in professional football players. J. Bone Jt. Surg., Am. Vol. 56:1185–1190, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fetto, J. F., and J. L. Marshall. Medial collateral ligament injuries of the knee: A rationale for treatment. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. (132):206–218, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Indelicato, P. A. Isolated medial collateral ligament injuries in the knee. J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg. 3:9–14, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jackson, D. W., E. S. Grood, J. D. Goldstein, M. A. Rosen, P. R. Kurzweil, J. F. Cummings, and T. M. Simon. A comparison of patellar tendon autograft and allograft used for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the goat model. Am. J. Sports Med. 21:176–185, 1993.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee, T. Q., and S. L. Woo. A new method for determining cross-sectional shape and area of soft tissues. J. Biomech. Eng. 110:110–114, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Loitz-Ramage, B. J., C. B. Frank, and N. G. Shrive. Injury size affects long-term strength of the rabbit medial collateral ligament. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. (337):272–280, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Miyasaka, K. C., D. M. Daniel, M. L. Stone, and P. Hirshman. The incidence of knee ligament injuries in the general population. Am. J. Knee Surg. 4:3–8, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ng, G. Y., B. W. Oakes, O. W. Deacon, I. D. McLean, and D. Lampard. Biomechanics of patellar tendon autograft for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in the goat: Three year study. J. Orthop. Res. 13:602–608, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Niyibizi, C., C. Sagarriga Visconti, G. Gibson, and K. Kavalkovich. Identification and immunolocalization of type X collagen at the ligament–bone interface. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 222:584–589, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ohland, K. J. M., S. L.-Y. P. Woo, J. M. Weiss, S. M. Takai, and F. J. M. Shelley. AHealing of combined injuries of the rabbit medial collateral ligament and its insertions: A long term study on the effects of conservative vs surgical treatment. Adv. Bioeng. BED-20:447–448, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Oster, D. M., E. S. Grood, S. M. Feder, D. L. Butler, and M. S. Levy. Primary and coupled motions in the intact and the ACL-deficient knee: An in vitro study in the goat model. J. Orthop. Res. 10:476–484, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Reider, B., M. R. Sathy, J. Talkington, N. Blyznak, and S. Kollias. Treatment of isolated medial collateral ligament in-juries in athletes with early functional rehabilitation. A five-year follow-up study. Am. J. Sports Med. 22:470–477, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rudy, T. W., G. A. Livesay, S. L. Woo, and F. H. Fu. A combined robotic/universal force sensor approach to deter-mine in situ forces of knee ligaments. J. Biomech. 29:1357–1360, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sandberg, R., B. Balkfors, B. Nilsson, and N. Westling. Operative versus nonoperative treatment of recent injuries to the ligaments of the knee. A prospective randomized study. J. Bone Jt. Surg., Am. Vol. 69:1120–1126, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Shelbourne, K. D., and D. V. Patel. Management of combined injuries of the anterior cruciate and medial collateral ligaments. J. Bone Jt. Surg., Am. Vol. 77:800–806, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Visconti, C. S., K. Kavalkovich, J.-J. Wu, and C. Niyibizi. Biochemical analysis of collagens at the ligament–bone interface reveals presence of cartilage-specific collagens. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 328:135–142, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Weiss, J. A., S. L.-Y. Woo, K. J. Ohland, S. Horibe, and P. O. Newton. Evaluation of a new injury model to study medial collateral ligament healing: Primary repair vs nonoperative treatment. J. Orthop. Res. 9:516–528, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Woo, S. L., M. I. Danto, K. J. Ohland, T. Q. Lee, and P. O. Newton. The use of a laser micrometer system to determine the cross-sectional shape and area of ligaments: A compara-tive study with two existing methods. J. Biomech. Eng. 112:426–431, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Woo, S. L.-Y., M. Inoue, E. McGurk-Burleson, and M. Gomez. Treatment of the medial collateral ligament injury II: Structure and function of canine knees in response to differing treatment regimens. Am. J. Sports Med. 15:22–29, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Woo, S. L.-Y., C. A. Orlando, J. F. Camp, and W. H. Akeson. Effects of postmortem storage by freezing on ligament tensile behavior. J. Biomech. 19:399–404, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Scheffler, S.U., Clineff, T.D., Papageorgiou, C.D. et al. Structure and Function of the Healing Medial Collateral Ligament in a Goat Model. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 29, 173–180 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1114/1.1349701

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1114/1.1349701

Navigation