Observation of Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) in a Year 3 Primary School in Johor Bahru

Authors

  • Nur Hazwani Mohd Muhridza Language Academy, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Linda A/P V. Prapagara Language Academy, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Aminabibi Satanihpy@Saidalvi Language Academy, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/lspi.v6n1.85

Abstract

Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) has a long history in an English as a Second Language (ESL) classroom. It is an approach which focuses on developing learners’ communicative skills in a meaningful context. However, the application of communicative language teaching (CLT) in an English language classroom has recently been debated extensively. Teachers still find it difficult and challenging to adopt CLT effectively in the classroom. This paper aims to report the application of CLT in a Year 3 English language classroom during a 90-minute lesson. Specifically, the study intended to observe and describe whether or not the teacher focused on CLT in terms of lesson development and implementation. Data was collected using an observation checklist and field notes in accordance with the objective of the study. The collected data was analysed using content analysis and validated by interrater reliability. The findings have indicated strengths and weaknesses in the lesson conducted. This can be seen in certain features of the observation towards CLT such as pair or group work activities, fluency of the language, error correction implemented by the teacher and the role of the teacher. It can be concluded that CLT approach should be given importance in the classroom by teachers in the learning process.

References

Al-Humaidi, M. 2011. Communicative Language Teaching. Retrieved November 15, 2016 from http://faculty.ksu.edu.sa.

Allwright, Dick andBailey, Kathleen M. 1999. Focus on the Language Classroom. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

Belchamber, R. 2007. The Advantages of Communicative Language Teaching. Retrieved November 13, 2016 from iteslj.org/Articles/Belchamber-CLT.

Brown, H. D. 2000. Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. 4thed. New York: Longman.

Brown, H. D. 2001. Teaching by principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. 2nded. New York: Longman.

Celce-Murcia, M. 1991. Grammar Pedagogy in Second and Foreign Language Teaching. TESOL Quarterly. 25(3): 459-478.

Doughty, C., & Long, M. H. (Eds.). 2003. Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. New York: Basil Blackwell.

Finocchiaro, M., & Brumfit, C. 1983. The Functional-notional Approach: From Theory to Practice. New York: Oxford University Press.

Gower, R., Phillips, D. & Walters, S. 1995. Teaching Practice Handbook. New York: Macmillan Heinemann English Language Teaching, Oxford

Harmer, Jeremy. 1998. How to Teach English. Addison Wesley Longman Limited

Hu, Guangwei. 2002. Potential Cultural Resistance to Pedagogical Imports: The Case of Communicative Language Teaching in China. Retrieved November 15 from http://www.multilingual-matters.net/lcc/015/0093/lcc0150093.pdf.

Hymes, D. 1972. On Communicative Competence. In J. B. Pride and J. Holmes (Eds.). Sociolinguistics. Harmondsworth, Middx: Penguin.

Johnson, K. 1982. Communicative Syllabus Design and Methodology. Oxford: Pergamon. Johnson, K., & Morrow, K. 1981. Communication in the Classroom: Applications and Methods for Communicative Approach. Essex: Longman.

Kumaravadivelu, B. 1994. The Postmethod Condition: Emerging Strategies for Second/Foreign Language Teaching. TESOL Quarterly. 28(1): 27-48.

Larsen-Freeman, D. 1986. Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching. New York: Oxford University Press.

Lindsay, C & Knight, P. 2006. Learning and Teaching English. A Course for Teachers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Littlewood, W. 2007. Communicative and Task-based Language teaching in East Asian Classrooms. Language Teaching. 40(3): 243-249.

Nguyen, L. V. 2010. Computer Mediated Collaborative Learning Within Communicative Language Teaching Approach: A Sociocultural Perspective. Asian EFL Journal. 12(1): 202-233.

Nunan, D. 1991. Communicative Tasks and the Language Curriculum. TESOL Quarterly. 25(2): 279-295.

Parrish, B. 2004. Teaching Adult ESL. A Practical Introduction. New York: McGraw Hill. Richards, J. 2006. Communicative Language Teaching Today. Retrieved November 15 from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/24270833.

Richards, J., & Rogers, T. 1986. Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Richards, Jack C, Lockhart, Charles. 1997. Reflective Teaching in Second language Classrooms. United Kingdom : Cambridge University Press.

Savignon, S. J. 1991. Communicative Language Teaching: State of the Art. Tesol Quarterly. 25(2): 261-277.

Savignon, S. J. 2007. Beyond Communicative Language Teaching: What's Ahead? Journal of Pragmatics. 39: 207-220.

Downloads

Published

2019-06-19

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Observation of Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) in a Year 3 Primary School in Johor Bahru. (2019). LSP International Journal, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.11113/lspi.v6n1.85