J Korean Acad Nurs Adm. 2017 Dec;23(5):548-557. Korean.
Published online Dec 31, 2017.
Copyright © 2017 Korean Academy of Nursing Administration
Original Article

Development and Effects of Simulation Program for Fall Management

Mi Yu,1 Jong Kyung Kim,2 Se Young Kim,3 Sung Hyun Cho,4 Myung Ja Kim,5 and GyeongAe Seomun6
    • 1College of Nursing, Institute of Health Sciences, Gyeongsang National University, Korea.
    • 2College of Nursing, Dankook University, Korea.
    • 3Department of Nursing, Changwon National University, Korea.
    • 4College of Nursing, Seoul National University, Korea.
    • 5Department of Nursing, Dong-eui University, Korea.
    • 6College of Nursing, Korea University, Korea.
Received November 17, 2017; Revised December 19, 2017; Accepted December 19, 2017.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Purpose

This study was carried out to develop simulation scenarios for the management patient falls and to evaluate the effects of using the scenarios with student nurses.

Methods

The research design was a quasi-experimental study using a methodology study. Study participants were 30 students who were in 4th year of nursing at one College of Nursing.

Results

When comparing knowledge of falls before and after the simulation program, it was found that knowledge increased by 4.90 (from 24.60 pre-test to 29.50 post-test). For clinical performance of fall management, the score for assessment was 10.17 out of 16, for intervention 5.97 out of 10, and for evaluation 7.33 out of 8. The average score for reporting a fall to the doctor was 19.87 out of 30 based on SBAR. Prior to the implementation of the simulation program, the confidence of reporting to the physician was less than 5 in all four areas, but self-confidence improved by more than 6 points in all four areas after the program was implemented.

Conclusion

Findings indicate that results of fall management simulation practice can contribute to nursing students' knowledge of falls, as well as to nursing interventions and post-treatment following a patient fall.

Keywords
Accidental falls; Nursing students; Patient care management; Self report; Simulation training

Tables

Table 1
Comparison of Nursing Students' Knowledge Related to Risk Factors, Prevention and Interventions for Patient Falls Before and After Implementing the Simulation Program (N=30)

Table 2
Evaluation of Nursing Students' Clinical Practice Competency for Fall Management (N=30)

Table 3
Evaluation of Nursing Students' Reporting the Patient Fall to Physician Using SBAR (N=30)

Table 4
Comparison of Nursing Students' Confidence in Reporting Patient Falls to Physician before and after Implementing the Simulation Program (N=30)

Notes

This work was supported by the Korean Academy of Nursing Administration fund in 2017.

References

    1. Lee WS, Cho KC, Yang SH, Roh YS, Lee GY. Effects of problem-based learning combined with simulation on the basic nursing competency of nursing students. J Korean Acad Fundam Nurs 2009;16(1):64–72.
    1. Norman J. A Systematic review of the literature on simulation in nursing education. ABNF J 2012;23(2):24–28.
    1. Jeffries PR, Hovancsek MT, Clochesy JM. Using clinical simulation in distance education. In: Novotny J, Davis RH, editors. Distance education in nursing. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Springer Pub.; 2006. pp. 83-99.
    1. Maxson PM, Dozois EJ, Holubar SD, Wrobleski DM, Dube JAO, Klipfel JM, et al. Enhancing nurse and physician collaboration in clinical decision making through high-fidelity interdisciplinary simulation training. Mayo Clin Proc 2011;86(1):31–36. [doi: 10.4065/mcp.2010.0282]
    1. Sweeney LA, Warren O, Gardner L, Rojek A, Lindquist DG. A simulation-based training program improves emergency department staff communication. Am J Med Qual 2014;29(2):115–123. [doi: 10.1177/1062860613491308]
    1. Ham YL. In: Development and evaluation of a simulation educational program using a high-fidelity patient simulator for undergraduate nursing students [dissertation]. Seoul: Yonsei University; 2009.
    1. Hospital Nurses Association. Practice guidelines and tools based on nursing process. Seoul: Hospital Nurses Association; 2016. pp. 1-361.
    1. Guise JM, Lowe NK. Do you speak SBAR? J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2006;35(3):313–314.10.1111/j.1552-6909.2006.00043.x.
    1. Leonard M, Graham S, Bonacum D. The human factor: The critical importance of effective teamwork and communication in providing safe care. Qual Saf Health Care 2004;13 Suppl 1:i85–i90.10.1136/qshc.2004.010033.
    1. Berkenstadt H, Haviv Y, Tuval A, Shemesh Y, Megrill A, Perry A, et al. Improving handoff communications in critical care: Utilizing simulation-based training toward process improvement in managing patient risk. Chest 2008;134(1):158–162. [doi: 10.1378/chest.07-0914]
    1. Kim HY, Jeong YJ, Kang J, Mun HS. The Effect of SBAR reports on communication clarity and nurse-physician collaborative relationships: A one group pretest-posttest design. J Muscle Joint Health 2016;23(2):105–113. [doi: 10.5953/jmjh.2016.23.2.105]
    1. Thomas CM, Bertram E, Johnson D. The SBAR communication technique: Teaching nursing students professional communication skills. Nurse Educ 2009;34(4):176–180. [doi: 10.1097/nne.0b013e3181aaba54]
    1. Ozekcin LR, Tuite P, Willner K, Hravnak M. Simulation education: Early identification of patient physiologic deterioration by acute care nurses. Clin Nurse Spec 2015;29(3):166–173. [doi: 10.1097/NUR.0000000000000123]
    1. Kim WJ, Kim SY. A study on the effects of the nursing management practice SBAR on nursing students' self-expressiveness, communication skills, and ability to think critically. J Learn Cent Curric Instr 2016;16(9):457–472. [doi: 10.22251/jlcci.2016.16.9.457]
    1. Ha Y, Lee Y, Lee YH. Simulation training applying SBAR for the improvement of nursing undergraduate students' interdisciplinary communication skills. J Korean Data Inf Sci Soc 2017;28(2):407–419. [doi: 10.7465/jkdi.2017.28.2.407]
    1. Jeffries PR. In: National league for nursing. Simulation in nursing education: From conceptualization to evaluation. 2nd ed. New York: National League for Nursing; 2007.
    1. O'Daniel M, Rosenstein AH. Professional communication and team collaboration. In: Hughes RG, editor. Patient safety and quality: An evidence-based handbook for nurses. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2008. pp. 1-14.
    1. Feingold CE, Calaluce M, Kallen MA. Computerized patient model and simulated clinical experiences: Evaluation with baccalaureate nursing students. J Nurs Educ 2004;43(4):156–163.
    1. Kim JJ, Lee KJ, Choi KY, Lee DW. Analysis of the evaluation for clinical performance examination using standardized patients in one medical school. Korean J Med Educ 2004;16(1):51–61. [doi: 10.3946/kjme.2004.16.1.51]
    1. Sok S, Kang HS, Kim WO, Hyun KS, Lee JA, Park SH. Effects and development of clinical competency evaluation using standardized patients among nursing students: Based on abdominal surgical patients. J Korean Acad Adult Nurs 2009;21(5):468–476.
    1. Beckett CD, Kipnis G. Collaborative communication: Integrating SBAR to improve quality/patient safety outcomes. J Healthc Qual 2009;31(5):19–28. [doi: 10.1111/j.1945-1474.2009.00043.x]
    1. Hur HK, Park SM. Effects of simulation based education, for emergency care of patients with dyspnea, on knowledge and performance confidence of nursing students. J Korean Acad Soc Nurs Educ 2012;18(1):111–119. [doi: 10.5977/jkasne.2012.18.1.111]
    1. Yang JJ. The effects of a simulation-based education on the knowledge and clinical competence for nursing students. J Korean Acad Soc Nurs Educ 2012;18(1):14–24. [doi: 10.5977/jkasne.2012.18.1.014]
    1. Lapkin S, Fernandez R, Levett-Jones T, Bellchambers H. The effectiveness of nursing human patient simulation manikins in teaching of clinical reasoning skills to undergraduate nursing students: A systematic review. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep 2010;8(16):661–694. [doi: 10.11124/01938924-201008160-00001]
    1. Cant RP, Cooper SJ. Simulation based learning in nurse education: Systematic review. J Adv Nurs 2010;66(1):3–15. [doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.05240.x]
    1. Lee J, Oh PJ. Effects of the use of high-fidelity human simulation in nursing education: A meta-analysis. J Nurs Educ 2015;54(9):501–507. [doi: 10.3928/01484834-20150814-04]
    1. Lee WS, Kim M. Effects and adequacy of high-fidelity simulation-based training for obstetrical nursing. J Korean Acad Nurs 2011;41(4):433–443. [doi: 10.4040/jkan.2011.41.4.433]
    1. Lee SJ, Park YM, Noh SM. The effects of simulation training with hybrid model for nursing students on nursing performance ability and self confidence. Korean J Adult Nurs 2013;25(2):170–182.
    1. Ha YK, Koh CK. The effects of mechanical ventilation simulation on the clinical judgment and self-confidence of nursing students. Perspect Nurs Sci 2012;9(2):119–126.
    1. Achrekar MS, Murthy V, Kanan S, Shetty R, Nair M, Khattry N. Introduction of situation, background, assessment, recommendation into nursing practice: A prospective study. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs 2016;3(1):45–50. [doi: 10.4103/2347-5625.178171]

Metrics
Share
Tables

1 / 4

PERMALINK