Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-06T13:17:59.831Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Understanding the effects of jury service on jurors' trust in courts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Liana Pennington  and
Matthew J. Dolliver
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Jury service is a positive, even transformative, experience for many jurors. Prior research establishes that jurors who deliberate on a court case develop more positive views of courts in the relatively short time of jury service, but we know little about the reasons underlying why these positive changes develop. This research focuses on changes in jurors' views after serving on criminal cases because jury service is one of the few opportunities community members have to participate directly in the criminal justice system, with jurors acting as the conscience of the community regarding the extent of prosecutorial power. Unlike most work using actual jurors, this research utilizes surveys with jurors both before and after jury service to understand how jury service brings about increased trust in courts. We examine the influence of three categories of potential factors, deliberating on a case, juror satisfaction, and jurors' attitudes relating to law and justice, finding all three categories work together to significantly predict whether jurors' trust in courts increases, decreases, or stays the same. Policy suggestions include developing innovative ways to capitalize on the positive and overall legitimizing aspects of jury service in criminal cases by increasing community members' meaningful involvement in the courts.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 56 , Issue 4 , December 2022 , pp. 580 - 600
Copyright
© 2022 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

How to cite this article: Pennington, Liana, and Matthew J. Dolliver. 2022. “Understanding the Effects of Jury Service on Jurors' Trust in Courts.” Law & Society Review 56(4): 580–600. https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12632

References

REFERENCES

Allen, James L. 1977. “Attitude Change Following Jury Duty.” The Justice System Journal 2(3): 246–257.Google Scholar
Allison, Paul D. 2002. “Missing Data: Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences.” British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 55(1): 193–196.Google Scholar
Appleman, Laura I. 2010. “The Plea Jury.” Indiana Law Journal 85: 731–776.Google Scholar
Appleman, Laura I. 2012. “Justice in the Shadowlands: Pretrial Detention, Punishment, & the Sixth Amendment.” Washington and Lee Law Review 69: 1297–1370.Google Scholar
Barkow, Rachel E. 2003. “Recharging the Jury: The Criminal Jury's Constitutional Role in an Era of Mandatory Sentencing.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 152: 33–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkow, Rachel E. 2006. “Separation of Powers and the Criminal Law.” Stanford Law Review 58: 989–1054.Google Scholar
Bell, Monica C. 2017. “Police Reform and the Dismantling of Legal Estrangement.” The Yale Law Journal 126: 2054–2150.Google Scholar
Benesh, Sara C. and Howell, Susan E. 2001. “Confidence in the Courts: A Comparison of Users and Non-users.” Behavioral Sciences & the Law 19: 199–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berrey, Ellen, Hoffman, Steve G., and Nielsen, Laura Beth. 2012. “Situated Justice: A Contextual Analysis of Fairness and Inequality in Employment Discrimination Litigation.” Law & Society Review 46: 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bibas, Stephanos. 2012. The Machinery of Criminal Justice. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloeser, Andrew. J., McCurley, Carl, and Mondak, Jeffrey J. 2012. “Jury Service as Civic Engagement: Determinants of Jury Summons Compliance.” American Politics Research 40(2): 179–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bornstein, Brian H. and Greene, Edie. 2017. The Jury under Fire: Myth, Controversy, and Reform. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bornstein, Brian H., Miller, Monica K., Nemeth, Robert J., Page, Gregory L., and Musil, Sara. 2005. “Juror Reactions to Jury Duty: Perceptions of the System and Potential Stressors.” Behavioral Sciences & the Law 23: 321–346.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chomos, Julianna C., Miller, Monica K., Sicafuse, Lorie L., James T. Richardson, Clayton D. Peoples, Hon. Celeste F. Bremer. 2011. “Increasing Juror Satisfaction: A Call to Action for Judges and Researchers.” Drake Law Review 59: 707–731.Google Scholar
Conrad, Robert J. Jr., and Clements, Katy L. 2018. “The Vanishing Criminal Trial: From Trial Judges to Sentencing Judges.” George Washington Law Review 86(1): 99–167.Google Scholar
Consolini, Paula M. 1992. “Learning by Doing Justice: Jury Service and Political Attitudes.” Unpublished Doctoral diss., Berkeley, CA: University of California.Google Scholar
Cornwall, Erin York and Hans, Valerie P. 2011. “Representation through Participation: A Multilevel Analysis of Jury Deliberations.” Law & Society Review 45(3): 667–698.Google Scholar
Cutler, Brian L. and Hughes, Donna M. 2001. “Judging Jury Service: Results of the North Carolina Administrative Office of the Courts Juror Survey.” Behavioral Sciences & the Law 19: 305–320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Devine, Dennis J. 2012. Jury Decision Making: The State of the Science. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Diamond, Shari Seidman. 1993. “What Jurors Think: Expectations and Reactions of Citizens Who Serve as Jurors.” In Verdict: Assessing the Civil Jury System. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Dilorio, Colleen, Soet, Johanna E., Van Marter, Deborah, Woodring, Tammy M., and William N. Dudley. 2000. “An Evaluation of a Self- Generated Identification Code.” Research in Nursing & Health 23: 167–174.3.0.CO;2-K>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewick, Patricia and Silbey, Susan S. 1998. The Common Place of Law: Stories from Everyday Life. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, Amy, Pennington, Liana, and Cronin, Shea. 2013. “Juror Perceptions of the Legitimacy of Legal Authorities and Decision Making in Criminal Cases.” Law & Social Inquiry 38(4): 773–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, Andrew Guthrie. 2012. Why Jury Duty Matters: A Citizen's Guide to Constitutional Action. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Field, Andy, 2013. Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics, 4th ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Flango, Victor E. and Clarke, Thomas M. 2015. Reimagining Courts: A Design for the Twenty-First Century. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Franke, Derrick, Bierie, David, and MacKenzie, Doris Layton. 2010. “Legitimacy in Corrections: A Randomized Experiment Comparing a Boot Camp with a Prison.” Criminology & Public Policy 9: 89–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galanter, Marc. 2004. “The Vanishing Trial: An Examination of Trials and Related Matters in Federal and State Courts.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 1(3): 459–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garvey, Stephen, Hannaford-Agor, Paula, Hans, Valerie P., Mott, Nicole L., Munsterman, G. Thomas and Wells, Martin T. 2004. “Juror First Votes in Criminal Trials.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 1: 371–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gastil, John, and Weiser, Phil. 2006. “Jury Service as an Invitation to Citizenship: Assessing the Civic Value of Institutionalized Deliberation.” The Policy Studies Journal 34: 605–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gastil, John, Dees, E. Pierre, and Weiser, Phil. 2002. “Civic Awakening in the Jury Room: A Test of the Connection between Jury Deliberation and Political Participation.” The Journal of Politics 64: 585–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gastil, John, Dees, E. Pierre, Weiser, Phil, and Simmons, Cindy. 2010. The Jury and Democracy: How Jury Deliberation Promotes Civic Engagement and Political Participation. New Yrk: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Greene, Edie, and Bornstein, Brian H. 2000. “Precious Little Guidance: Jury Instruction on Damage Awards.” Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 6: 743–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grube, Joel W., Morgan, Mark, and Kearney, Kathleen A. 1989. “Using Self-Generated Identification Codes to Match Questionnaires in Panel Studies of Adolescent Substance Use.” Addictive Behaviors 14(2): 159–171.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hale, Dennis. 2016. The Jury in America: Triumph and Decline. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamm, Joseph A., PytlikZillig, Lisa M., Tomkins, Alan J., Herian, Mitchel N., Bornstein, Brian H., and Neeley, Elizabeth M. 2011. “Exploring Separable Components of Institutional Confidence.” Behavioral Sciences & the Law 29(1): 95–115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hannaford-Agor, Paula L., Hans, Valerie P., Mott, Nicole L., and Munsterman, G. Thomas. 2002. Evaluation of Hung Juries in Bronx County, New York, Los Angeles County, California, Maricopa County, Arizona, and Washington, DC, 2000–2001. Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research Study Number 3689. Williamsburg, Virginia: National Center for State Courts.Google Scholar
Hans, Valerie P., Gastil, John, and Feller, Traci. 2014. “Deliberative Democracy and the American Civil Jury.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 11(4): 697–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hastie, Reid, Penrod, Steven D., and Pennington, Nancy. 1983. Inside the Jury. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howell, Susan E. 1998. “Citizen Evaluation of the Louisiana Courts.” Survey Research Center Publications, Paper 31. http://scholarworks.uno.edu/src_pubs/31.Google Scholar
Iontcheva, Jenia. 2003. “Jury Sentencing as Democratic Practice.” Virginia Law Review 89: 311–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalven, Harry, Jr., and Zeisel, Hans. 1966. The American Jury. Boston, MA: Little Brown.Google Scholar
Kearney, Kathleen A., Hopkins, Ronald H., Mauss, Armand L., and Weisheit, Ralph A. 1984. “Self-Generated Identification Codes for Anonymous Collection of Longitudinal Questionnaire Data.” Public Opinion Quarterly 48(1B): 370–378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirk, David S. and Matsuda, Mauri. 2011. “Legal Cynicism, Collective Efficacy, and the Ecology of Arrest.” Criminology 49: 443–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klecka, William R. 1985. Discriminant Analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Kochel, Tammy Rinehart. 2019. “Explaining Racial Differences in Ferguson's Impact on Local Residents' Trust and Perceived Legitimacy: Policy Implications for Police.” Criminal Justice Policy Review 30(3): 374–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael S., Bryman, Alan E., and Liao, Tim F. 2011. “Welch Test.” In The SAGE Encyclopedia of Social Science Research Methods 1193–1194. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Lind, E. Allan. and Tyler, Tom R. 1988. The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, Zhenqiu Laura and Yuan, Ke-Hai. 2012. “Welch's t Test.” In Salkind, Neil J. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Research Design, edited by Salkind, N., Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. 1621–1623.Google Scholar
MacCoun, Robert J, and Tyler, Tom R. 1988. “The Basis of Citizens' Perceptions of the Criminal Jury.” Law and Human Behavior 12: 333–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddala, G. S. 1983. Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazzone, Jason. 2003. “The Waiver Paradox.” Northwestern University Law Review 97(2): 801–878.Google Scholar
McGloin, Joe, Holcomb, Sherry, and Main, Deborah S. 1996. “Matching Anonymous Pre-Post Tests Using Subject-Generated Information.” Evaluation Review 20(6): 724–736.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McLeod, Poppy Lauretta, Lobel, Sharon Alisa, and Cox, Taylor H. Jr. 1996. “Ethnic Diversity and Creativity in Small Groups.” Small Group Research 27: 248–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mertler, Craig A, and Rachel Vannatta, Reinhart. 2017. Advanced and Multivariate Statistical Methods: Practical Application and Interpretation, 6th ed. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Moore, Mark H. 1997. “Legitimizing Criminal Justice Policies and Practices.” FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin 10: 14–21.Google Scholar
Morin, Rich, and Stepler, Renee. 2016. The Racial Confidence Gap in Police Performance. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.Google Scholar
Mott, Nicole L., Hans, Valerie P., and Simpson, Lindsay. 2000. “What's half a Lung Worth? Civil Jurors' Accounts of their Award Decision Making.” Law and Human Behavior 24: 401–419.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Munsterman, G. Thomas, Hannaford-Agor, Paula L., and Whitehead, G. Marc. 2006. Jury Trial Innovations, 2nd ed. Williamsburg, VA: National Center for State Courts.Google Scholar
Murray, JaneAnne. 2019. “Ameliorating the Federal Trial Penalty through a Systematic Judicial “Second Look” Procedure.” Federal Sentencing Reporter 31: 279–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musick, Marc A., Rose, Mary R., Dury, Sarah, and Rose, Roger P. 2015. “Much Obliged: Volunteering, Normative Activities, and Willingness to Serve on Juries.” Law & Social Inquiry 40: 433–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Center for State Courts (NCSC). 1999. “How the Public Views the State Courts: A 1999 National Survey.” http://www.flcourts.org/core/fileparse.php/243/urlt/publicop_natl.pdf.Google Scholar
Neily, Clark. 2019. “Jury Empowerment as an Antidote to Coercive Bargaining.” Federal Sentencing Reporter 31: 384–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newport, Frank. 2016. “Public Opinion Context: Americans, Race and Police.” Gallup News. http://news.gallup.com/opinion/polling-matters/193586/public-opinion-context-americans-race-police.aspx.Google Scholar
Norman, Jim. 2016. “Americans' Confidence in Institutions Stays Low.” Gallup News. http://www.gallup.com/poll/192581/americans-confidence-institutions-stays-low.aspx.Google Scholar
Polletta, Francesca. 2008. “Just Talk: Public Deliberation after 9/11.” Journal of Public Deliberation 4(1): 1–22.Google Scholar
Reaves, Brian A. 2013. Felony Defendants in Large Urban Counties, 2009 – Statistical Tables. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, US Department of Justice. https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/fdluc09.pdf.Google Scholar
Rose, Mary R. 2005. “A Dutiful Voice: Justice in the Distribution of Jury Service.” Law & Society Review 39(3): 601–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, Mary R., Ellison, Christopher G., and Diamond, Shari Seidman. 2008. “Preferences for Juries over Judges across Racial and Ethnic Groups.” Social Science Quarterly 89: 372–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, Mary R., Diamond, Shari Seidman, Ellison, Christopher G., and Krebs, Andrew V. 2018. “Juries and Viewpoint Representation.” Justice Quarterly 35(1): 114–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rottman, David B. 1998. “On Public Trust and Confidence: Does Experience with the Courts Promote or Diminish it?” Court Review 35: 14–22.Google Scholar
Rottman, David B. 2005. Trust and Confidence in the California Courts: A Survey of the Public and Attorneys. Washington, DC: National Center for the State Courts.Google Scholar
Rottman, David B, and Hansen, Randall M. 2001. How Recent Users View the State Courts: Perceptions of Whites, African-Americans, and Latinos. Washington, DC: National Center for State Courts.Google Scholar
Ryan, Meghan J. 2014. “Juries and the Criminal Constitution.” Alabama Law Review 65: 849–902.Google Scholar
Schnell, Rainer, Bachteler, Tobias, and Reiher, Jörg. 2010. “Improving the Use of Self-Generated Identification Codes.” Evaluation Review 34(5): 391–418.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shuman, Daniel W, and Hamilton, Jean A. 1992. “Jury Service—It May Change your Mind: Perceptions of Fairness of Jurors and Nonjurors.” Southern Methodist University Law Review 46: 449–479.Google Scholar
Sicafuse, Lorie L., Chomos, Juliannna C., and Miller, Monica K. 2013. “Promoting Positive Perceptions of Jury Service: An Analysis of Juror Experiences, Opinions, and Recommendations for Courts.” Justice System Journal 34: 85–106.Google Scholar
Sommers, Samuel R. 2006. “On Racial Diversity and Group Decision-Making: Identifying Multiple Effects of Racial Composition on Jury Deliberations.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 90: 597–612.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sommers, Samuel R. 2007. “Race and the Decision Making of Juries.” Legal and Criminological Psychology 12: 171–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommers, Samuel R. 2008. “Determinants and Consequences of Jury Racial Diversity: Empirical Findings, Implications, and Directions for Future Research.” Social Issues and Policy Review 2(1): 65–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommers, Samuel R. and Ellsworth, Phoebe C. 2001. “White Juror Bias: An Investigation of Racial Prejudice Against Black Defendants in the American Courtroom.” Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 7: 201–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swain v. Alabama, 380 U.S. 202. 1965.Google Scholar
Tabachnick, Barbara G, and Fidell, Linda S. 2012. Using Multivariate Statistics. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.Google Scholar
Tankebe, Justice, Reisig, Michael D., and Wang, Xia. 2016. “A Multidimensional Model of Police Legitimacy: A Cross-Cultural Assessment.” Law and Human Behavior 40: 11–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, Suja A. 2016. The Missing American Jury: Restoring the Fundamental Constitutional Role of the Criminal, Civil, and Grant Juries. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, Tom R. 1990. Why People Obey the Law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Tyler, Tom R. 2001. “Public Trust and Confidence in Legal Authorities: What Do Majority and Minority Group Members Want from the Law and Legal Institutions?” Behavorial Sciences and the Law 19: 215–235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tyler, Tom R, and Fagan, Jffrey. 2008. “Legitimacy and Cooperation: Why Do People Help the Police Fight Crime in their Communities?” Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 6: 231–275.Google Scholar
Tyler, Tom R, and Huo, Yuen J. 2002. Trust in the law: Encouraging Public Cooperation with the Police and Courts. New York: Russell-Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
United States v. Dougherty, 473 F.2d 1113 (D.C. Cir. 1972). Bazelon, J., concurring in part, dissenting in part.Google Scholar
US Census Bureau. 2018. Quick Facts, V2018. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Vidmar, Neil and Hans, Valerie P. 2007. American Juries: The Verdict. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Waters, Nicole L., and Hans, Valerie P. 2009. “A Jury of One: Opinion Formation, Conformity, and Dissent on Juries.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 6: 513–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weitzer, Ronald and Tuch, Steven A. 2006. Race and Policing in America: Conflict and Reform. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winter, Alix S., and Clair, Matthew. 2018. “Jurors' Subjective Experiences of Deliberations in Criminal Cases.” Law & Social Inquiry 43(4): 1458–1490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar