Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-04T16:19:11.129Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Detained: A Study of Immigration Bond Hearings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Emily Ryo
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Immigration judges make consequential decisions that fundamentally affect the basic life chances of thousands of noncitizens and their family members every year. Yet, we know very little about how immigration judges make their decisions, including decisions about whether to release or detain noncitizens pending the completion of their immigration cases. Using original data on long-term immigrant detainees, I examine for the first time judicial decision making in immigration bond hearings. I find that there are extremely wide variations in the average bond grant rates and bond amount decisions among judges in the study sample. What are the determinants of these bond decisions? My analysis shows that the odds of being granted bond are more than 3.5 times higher for detainees represented by attorneys than those who appeared pro se, net of other relevant factors. My analysis also shows that the detainees' prior criminal history is the only significant legally relevant factor in both the grant/deny and bond amount decisions, net of other relevant factors. This finding points to the need for further research on whether and how immigration courts might be exercising crime control through administrative proceedings.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 50 , Issue 1 , March 2016 , pp. 117 - 153
Copyright
© 2016 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Data used in this study were collected in collaboration with Caitlin Patler. I thank Scott Altman, Jennifer Chacón, John Donohue, Ingrid Eagly, Sam Erman, Niels Frenzen, Deep Gulasekaram, Kevin Johnson, Greg Keating, Andrew Kim, Tom Lyon, John Matsusaka, Cecilia Menjívar, Michael Shapiro, Dan Simon, Juliet Stumpf, Phil Torrey, and the reviewers and editors at the Law & Society Review for their helpful comments on earlier drafts of this article. I am grateful to David Grusky, Tomás Jiménez, and Bruce Western for their generous support. This research was supported by the American Sociological Association/National Science Foundation Advancement of the Discipline Fund, Stanford Center on Poverty and Inequality, Stanford Center for Comparative Studies in Race and Ethnicity, USC Population Research Center, and the USC Gould School of Law.

References

References

ABA Commission on Immigration (2015) Family Immigration Detention: Why the Past Cannot Be Prologue. Washington, DC: American Bar Association.Google Scholar
ACLU (2014) Restoring Due Process. Los Angeles: American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California.Google Scholar
Albonetti, Celesta A., et al. (1989) “Criminal Justice Decision Making as a Stratification Process: The Role of Race and Stratification Resources in Pretrial Release,” 5 J. of Quantitative Criminology 57–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Applied Research Center (2011) Shattered Families: The Perilous Intersection of Immigration Enforcement and the Child Welfare System. New York: Applied Research Center.Google Scholar
Ayres, Ian, & Waldfogel, Joel (1994) “A Market Test for Race Discrimination in Bail Setting,” 46 Stanford Law Rev. 987–1047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bainbridge, Stephen M., & Gulati, G. Mitu (2002) “How Do Judges Maximize? (The Same Way Everybody Else Does—Boundedly): Rules of Thumb in Securities Fraud Opinions,” 51 Emory Law J. 83–151.Google Scholar
Baradaran, Shima, & McIntyre, Frank (2012) “Predicting Violence,” 90 Texas Law Rev. 497–570.Google Scholar
Baum, Lawrence (2010) “Judicial Specialization and the Adjudication of Immigration Cases,” 59 Duke Law J. 1501–61.Google Scholar
Beckett, Katherine, & Evans, Heather (2015) “Crimmigration at the Local Level: Criminal Justice Processes in the Shadow of Deportation,” 49 Law & Society Rev. 241–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benson, Lenni B., & Wheeler, Russell R. (2012) Enhancing Quality and Timeliness in Immigration Removal Adjudication. Washington, DC: Administrative Conference of the U.S.Google Scholar
Bock, E. Wilbur, & Frazier, Charles E. (1977) “Official Standards Versus Actual Criteria in Bond Dispositions,” 5 J. of Criminal Justice 321–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosworth, Mary, & Kaufman, Emma (2011) “Foreigners in a Carceral Age: Immigration and Imprisonment in the United States,” 22 Stanford Law & Policy Rev. 429–54.Google Scholar
Cameron, A. Colin, Gelbach, Jonah B., & Miller, Douglas L. (2008) “Bootstrap-Based Improvements for Inference with Clustered Errors,” 90 Rev. of Economics and Statistics 414–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaudry, Ajay, et al. (2010) Facing Our Future: Children in the Aftermath of Immigration Enforcement. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.Google Scholar
Cross, Frank B. (2007) Decision Making in the U.S. Courts of Appeals. Stanford: Stanford Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daly, Kathleen (1987) “Discrimination in the Criminal Courts: Family, Gender, and the Problem of Equal Treatment,” 66 Social Forces 152–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demuth, Stephen, & Steffensmeier, Darrell (2004) “The Impact of Gender and Race-Ethnicity in the Pretrial Release Process,” 51 Social Problems 222–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devers, Lindsey (2011) Bail Decisionmaking: Research Summary. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
Dhami, Mandeep K. (2003) “Psychological Models of Professional Decision Making,” 14 Psychological Science 175–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dhami, Mandeep K., & Ayton, Peter (2001) “Bailing and Jailing the Fast and Frugal Way,” 14 J. of Behavioral Decision Making 141–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagly, Ingrid V., & Shafer, Steven (2015) “A National Study of Access to Counsel in Immigration Court,” 164 Univ. of Pennsylvania Law Rev. 1–91.Google Scholar
EOIR (2015) Immigration Judge Benchbook: Introductory Guide—Bonds. U.S. Department of Justice. Available at: http://www.justice.gov/eoir/vll/benchbook/tools/Bond_Guide.pdf (accessed 3 October 2015).Google Scholar
Epstein, Lee, Landes, William M., & Posner, Richard A. (2013) The Behavior of Federal Judges: A Theoretical and Empirical Study of Rational Choice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Free, Marvin D. (2002) “Race and Presentencing Decisions in the United States: A Summary and Critique of the Research,” 27 Criminal Justice Rev. 203–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Free, Marvin D. (2004) “Bail and Pretrial Release Decisions: An Assessment of the Racial Threat Perspective,” 2 J. of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice 23–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freiburger, Tina L., et al. (2010) “The Impact of Race on the Pretrial Decision,” 35 American J. of Criminal Justice 76–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galanter, Marc (1974) “Why the “Haves” Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change,” 9 Law & Society Rev. 95–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GAO (2008) U.S. Asylum System: Significant Variation Existed in Asylum Outcomes across Immigration Courts and Judges (GAO-08-940). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Accountability Office.Google Scholar
GAO (2011) Criminal Alien Statistics: Information on Incarcerations, Arrests, and Costs (GAO-11-187). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Accountability Office.Google Scholar
GAO (2013) Immigration Detention: Additional Actions Could Strengthen DHS Efforts to Address Sexual Abuse (GAO-14-38). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Accountability Office.Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, Gerd (2004) “Fast and Frugal Heuristics: The Tools of Bounded Rationality,” in Koehler, D., & Harvey, N., eds., Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, Gerd, & Goldstein, Daniel G. (1996) “Reasoning the Fast and Frugal Way: Models of Bounded Rationality,” 103 Psychological Rev. 650–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilboy, Janet A. (1987) “Setting Bail in Deportation Cases: The Role of Immigration Judges,” 24 San Diego Law Rev. 347–409.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving (1961) Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Goldkamp, John S., & Gottfredson, Michael R. (1979) “Bail Decision Making and Pretrial Detention: Surfacing Judicial Policy,” 3 Law and Human Behavior 227–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottfredson, Michael R., & Gottfredson, Don M. (1990) Decision Making in Criminal Justice: Toward the Rational Exercise of Discretion. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Guthrie, Chris, & George, Tracey E. (2005) “The Futility of Appeal: Disciplinary Insights into the “Affirmance Effect” on the United States Courts of Appeals,” 32 Florida State Univ. Law Rev. 357–85.Google Scholar
Guthrie, Chris, Rachlinski, Jeffrey J., & Wistrich, Andrew J. (2001) “Inside the Judicial Mind,” 86 Cornell Law Rev. 777–830.Google Scholar
Hernández, César Cuauhtémoc García (2015) Crimmigration Law. Chicago: ABA Book Publishing.Google Scholar
Johnson, Dawn Marie (2001) “AEDPA and the IIRIRA: Treating Misdemeanors as Felonies for Immigration Purposes, The Legislative Reform,” 27 J. of Legislation 477–91.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel (2003) “Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics,” 93 American Economic Rev. 1449–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Charles M., & Spohn, Cassia (1995) “The Effect of Race and Gender on Bail Outcomes: A Test of an Interactive Model,” 19 American J. of Criminal Justice 161–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kazemian, Lila, McCoy, Candace, & Sacks, Meghan (2013) “Does Law Matter? An Old Bail Law Confronts the New Penology,” 15 Punishment & Society 43–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keith, Linda Camp, Holmes, Jennifer S., & Miller, Banks P. (2013) “Explaining the Divergence in Asylum Grant Rates among Immigration Judges: An Attitudinal and Cognitive Approach,” 35 Law & Policy 261–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelman, Mark (2011) The Heuristics Debate. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laura and John Arnold Foundation (2013) Research Summary: Pretrial Criminal Justice Research. Houston: Laura and John Arnold Foundation.Google Scholar
Legomsky, Stephen H. (2006) “Deportation and the War on Independence,” 91 Cornell Law Rev. 369–409.Google Scholar
Light, Michael T. (2014) “The New Face of Legal Inequality: Noncitizens and the Long-Term Trends in Sentencing Disparities across U.S. District Courts, 1992-2009,” 48 Law & Society Rev. 447–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lustig, Stuart L., et al. (2008) “Inside the Judges' Chambers: Narrative Responses from the National Association of Immigration Judges Stress and Burnout Survey,” 23 Georgetown Immigration Law J. 57–83.Google Scholar
Maddala, G. S. (1983) Limited Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markowitz, Peter L. (2011) “Deportation is Different,” 13 J. of Constitutional Law 1299–361.Google Scholar
Marks, Leigh (2012) “Still a Legal “Cinderella” ? Why Immigration Courts Remain an Ill-Treated Stepchild of Today,” 59 Federal Law 25–33.Google Scholar
Marra, Giampiero, & Radice, Rosalba (2011) “Estimation of a Semiparametric Recursive Bivariate Probit Model in the Presence of Endogeneity,” 39 Canadian J. of Statistics 259–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIntyre, Frank, & Baradaran, Shima (2013) “Race, Prediction, and Pretrial Detention,” 10 J. of Empirical Legal Studies 741–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Banks, et al. (2015) “Leveling the Odds: The Effect of Quality Legal Representation in Cases of Asymmetrical Capability,” 49 Law & Society Rev. 209–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moineddin, Rahim, Matheson, Flora I., & Glazier, Richard H. (2007) “A Simulation Study of Sample Size for Multilevel Logistic Regression Models,” 7 BMC Medical Research Methodology 34–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Monfardini, Chiara, & Radice, Rosalba (2008) “Testing Exogeneity in the Bivariate Probit Model: A Monte Carlo Study,” 70 Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 271–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morehouse, Angela (2010) “Changes in the Wind: How Increased Detention Rates, New Medical Care Standards, and ICE Policy Shifts Alter the Debate on Immigrant Detainee Healthcare,” 5 Intercultural Human Rights Law Rev. 187–239.Google Scholar
Nagel, Ilene H. (1983) “The Legal/Extra-Legal Controversy: Judicial Decisions in Pretrial Release,” 17 Law & Society Rev. 481–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Immigration Forum (2013) The Math of Immigration Detention. Washington, DC: National Immigration Forum.Google Scholar
National Immigration Forum (2014) Detention Costs Still Don't Add Up to Good Policy. Washington, DC: National Immigration Forum.Google Scholar
New York Immigration Representation Study (2011) “Accessing Justice: The Availability and Adequacy of Counsel in Immigration Proceedings,” 33 Cardozo Law Rev. 357–416.Google Scholar
Open Society Foundations (2011) The Socioeconomic Impact of Pretrial Detention. New York: Open Society Foundations.Google Scholar
Packer, Herbert L. (1968) The Limits of the Criminal Sanction. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pager, Devah (2003) “The Mark of a Criminal Record,” 108 American J. of Sociology 937–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rachlinski, Jeffrey J., Wistrich, Andrew J., & Guthrie, Chris (2013) “Altering Attention in Adjudication,” 60 UCLA Law Rev. 1586–618.Google Scholar
Ramji-Nogales, Jaya, Schoenholtz, Andrew I., & Schrag, Philip G. (2009) Refugee Roulette: Disparities in Asylum Adjudication and Proposals for Reform. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
Rottman, Andy J., Fariss, Christopher J., & Poe, Steven C. (2009) “The Path to Asylum in the U.S. and the Determinants for Who Gets In and Why,” 43 International Migration Rev. 3–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryo, Emily (2013) “Deciding to Cross: The Norms and Economics of Unauthorized Migration,” 78 American Sociological Rev. 574–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryo, Emily (2015) “Less Enforcement, More Compliance: Rethinking Unauthorized Migration,” 62 UCLA Law Rev. 622–70.Google Scholar
Sanders, Robert M. (1993) “Immigration Bond: An Analysis of the Determinants of Official Decisions,” 20 Crime, Law & Social Change 139–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sayed, Faiza W. (2011) “Challenging Detention: Why Immigrant Detainees Receive Less Process than “Enemy Combatants” and Why They Deserve More,” 111 Columbia Law Rev. 1833–77.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, Traci (2005) “Racial and Ethnic Disparity in Pretrial Criminal Processing,” 22 Justice Quarterly 170–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schriro, Dora (2009) Immigration Detention Overview and Recommendations. Washington DC: U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement.Google Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A. (2011) “What's Law Got to Do With It: Thoughts from The Realm of Political Science,” in Geyh, C., ed., What's Law Got to Do With It? What Judges Do, Why They Do It, and What's at Stake. Stanford: Stanford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A., & Spaeth, Harold J. (1993) The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Shah, Anuj K., & Oppenheimer, Daniel M. (2008) “Heuristics Made Easy: An Effort-Reduction Framework,” 134 Psychological Bulletin 207–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simanski, John F. (2014) Immigration Enforcement Actions: 2013. Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security, Office of Immigration Statistics.Google Scholar
Spohn, Cassia (2009) “Race, Sex, and Pretrial Detention in Federal Court: Indirect Effects and Cumulative Disadvantage,” 57 Kansas Law Rev. 879–901.Google Scholar
Stumpf, Juliet P. (2006) “The Crimmigration Crisis: Immigrants, Crime, and Sovereign Power,” 56 American Univ. Law Rev. 367–419.Google Scholar
Stumpf, Juliet P. (2011) “Doing Time: Crimmigration Law and the Perils of Haste,” 58 UCLA Law Rev. 1705–48.Google Scholar
Suffet, Frederic (1966) “Bail Setting: A Study of Courtroom Interaction,” 12 Crime & Delinquency 318–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. (2006) Are Judges Political? An Empirical Analysis of the Federal Judiciary. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
TRAC Immigration (2013) Legal Noncitizens Receive Longest ICE Detention. Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, Syracuse University. Available at: http://trac.syr.edu/immigration/reports/321/(accessed 3 October 2015).Google Scholar
TRAC Immigration (2015) Backlog of Pending Cases in Immigration Courts as of January 2015. Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, Syracuse University. Available at: http://trac.syr.edu/phptools/immigration/court_backlog/apprep_backlog.php (accessed 3 October 2015).Google Scholar
Turner, K.B., & Johnson, James B. (2005) “A Comparison of Bail Amounts for Hispanics, Whites, and African Americans: A Single County Analysis,” 30 American J. of Criminal Justice 35–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, Amos, & Kahneman, Daniel (1974) “Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases,” 185 Science 1124–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cases Cited

Castro-O'Ryan v. INS, 847 F.2d 1307 (1988).Google Scholar
Rodriguez v. Robbins, No. CV 07-03239-TJH (RNBx) (C.D. Cal. Sept. 13, 2012) (order granting preliminary injunction).Google Scholar
Rodriguez v. Robbins, No. CV 07-03239-TJH (RNBx) (C.D. Cal. August 6, 2013) (order granting permanent injunction).Google Scholar
Rodriguez v. Robbins, 715 F.3d 1127. (9th Cir. 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
In re Guerra, 24 I. & N. Dec. 37 (BIA 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Statues Cited

Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214 (1996) (codified as amended in scattered sections of 8, 18, 22, 28, and 42 U.S.C.).Google Scholar
Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-208, 110 Stat. 3009 (1996) (codified in scattered sections of 8, 18, and 28 U.S.C.).Google Scholar
Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. §§ 1101-1178 (2006).Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Ryo supplementary material
Download undefined(File)
File 44.6 KB