Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-02T18:51:20.223Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Workers as Whole People With Their Own Objectives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Jennifer M. George  and
Erik Dane
Jennifer M. George*
Affiliation:
Rice University
Erik Dane
Affiliation:
Rice University
*
E-mail: jgeorge@rice.edu, Address: Jesse H. Jones Graduate School of Business and Department of Psychology, Rice University, 6100 Main Street, Houston, TX 77005
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , March 2011 , pp. 109 - 111
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2011 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bamberger, P. A., & Pratt, M. G. (2010). Moving forward by looking back: Reclaiming unconventional research contexts and samples in organizational scholarship. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 665–671. Google Scholar
Brendel, E. (2004). Intuition pumps and the proper use of thought experiments. Dialectica, 58, 89–108. Google Scholar
Brief, A. P., & Atieh, J. M. (1987). Studying job stress: Are we making mountains out of molehills? Journal of Occupational Behaviour, 8, 115–126. Google Scholar
Edwards, J. R., & Rothbard, N. P. (1999). Work and family stress and well-being: An examination of person–environment fit in the work and family domains. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 77, 85–129. Google Scholar
George, J. M., & Brief, A. P. (1990). The economic instrumentality of work: An examination of the moderating effects of financial requirements and sex on the pay-life satisfaction relationship. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 37, 357–368. Google Scholar
George, J. M., & Jones, G. R. (1996). The experience of work and turnover intentions: Interactive effects of value attainment, job satisfaction, and positive mood. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 318–325. Google Scholar
George, J. M., & Jones, G. R. (1997). Experiencing work: Values, attitudes, and moods. Human Relations, 50, 393–416. Google Scholar
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 61–83. Google Scholar
Kasser, T., Cohn, S., Kanner, A. D., & Ryan, R. M. (2007). Some costs of American corporate capitalism: A psychological exploration of value and goal conflicts. Psychological Inquiry, 18, 1–22. Google Scholar
Kreiner, G. E. (2006). Consequences of work-home segmentation or integration: A person-environment fit perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 485–507. Google Scholar
Madjar, N., Oldham, G. R., & Pratt, M. G. (2002). There's no place like home? The contributions of work and nonwork creativity support to employees' creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 757–767. Google Scholar
Rampell, C. (2010, May 13). Many good at jobs that are vanishing. Houston Chronicle, D1.Google Scholar
Rothbard, N. P. (2001). Enriching or depleting? The dynamics of engagement in work and family roles. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 655–684. Google Scholar
Weiss, H. M., & Rupp, D. E. (2011). Experiencing work: An essay on a person-centric work psychology. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 83–97.Google Scholar