Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-24T04:03:42.490Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Enigma of Comparative Law: Variations on a Theme for the Twenty-First Century , by Esin Örücü . Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, vi + 216 + (bibliography and index) 25 pp. (Euro 70.00 hardback). ISBN 9004139893.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Copyright
Copyright © Society of Legal Scholars 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Glenn, P. Legal Traditions of the World (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2nd ed 2004).Google Scholar

2. J. Whitman, (2004.) ‘A Simple Story’, review of P. Glenn, Legal Traditions of the World, in (2004) 4 Rechtsgeschichte, 206–8.

3. Whitehead, C. K. (Forthcoming) ‘What's your Sign? International Norms, Signals and Compliance’, Michigan Journal of International Law.Google Scholar

4. Nelken, D., ‘Legal Transplants and Beyond: Of Disciplines and Metaphors,’in Harding, A. and Örücü, E. eds Comparative Law for the 21st Century (The Hague: Kluwer, 2002), pp 1934.Google Scholar

5. See fn. 3.

6. See Nelken, D., ‘Towards a Sociology of Legal Adaptation’in Nelken, D. and Feest, J. eds. Adapting Legal Cultures, (Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2001), 155.Google Scholar

7. see e.g. Dezalay, Y. and Garth, B. Dealing in Virtue (Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1996).Google Scholar

8. Renner, K. The Institutions of Private Law and their Social Functions, (London: RKP, 1949).Google Scholar

9. see e.g. Starr, J. Law as Metaphor: From Islamic Courts to the Palace of Justice (New York, SUNY Press, 1992).Google Scholar

10. E.g. Twining, W. Diffusion of Law: a Global Perspective’ (2004) 49 Journal of Legal Pluralism 145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar