Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-09T00:04:16.503Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gender Bias in Medical Implant Design and Use: A Type of Moral Aggregation Problem?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Katrina Hutchison
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this article, I describe how gender bias can affect the design, testing, clinical trials, regulatory approval, and clinical use of implantable devices. I argue that bad outcomes experienced by women patients are a cumulative consequence of small biases and inattention at various points of the design, testing, and regulatory process. However, specific instances of inattention and bias can be difficult to identify, and risks are difficult to predict. This means that even if systematic gender bias in implant design is an ethical issue, it is one with no clearly blameworthy player. From a practical perspective, there is no single obvious point at which to intervene. Philosophers working in other areas have explored structurally similar moral problems—sometimes referred to as “moral aggregation problems”—such as the type of environmental harm caused by small actions of many players. I describe key features of these type of problems and strategies to address them. I then draw on these to suggest an approach to gender bias in medical implant design and use.

Type
Articles
Information
Hypatia , Volume 34 , Issue 3 , Summer 2019 , pp. 570 - 591
Copyright
Copyright © 2019 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ardaugh, Brent M., Graves, Stephen E., and Redberg, Rita F. 2013. The 510 (k) ancestry of a metal‐on‐metal hip implant. New England Journal of Medicine 368 (2): 97–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Australian Broadcasting Commission. 2011. Tasmanian leads hip class action. ABC News Online, February 28. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2011-02-28/tasmanian-leads-hip-class-action/1960270.Google Scholar
Australian Orthopaedic Association. 2018. Diversity in healthcare—why are we still talking about it? https://www.aoa.org.au/for-patients/articles-and-galleries/article-diversity-in-healthcare.Google Scholar
Bancroft, John, Loftus, Jeni, and Scott Long, J. 2003. Distress about sex: A national survey of women in heterosexual relationships. Archives of Sexual Behaviour 32 (3): 193–208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barclay, Catharine D., Cutting, James E., and Kozlowski, Lynn T. 1978. Temporal and spatial factors in gait perception that influence gender recognition. Perception & Psychophysics 23 (2): 145–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brennan, Samantha. 2006. Moral lumps. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 9 (3): 249–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, Samantha. 2013. Rethinking the moral significance of micro‐inequities: The case of women in philosophy. In Women in philosophy: What needs to change?, ed. Hutchison, Katrina and Jenkins, Fiona. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brennan, Samantha. 2016. The moral status of micro‐inequities: In favour of institutional solutions. In Implicit bias and philosophy, volume 2: Moral responsibility, structural injustice, and ethics, ed. Brownstein, Michael and Mather Sau, Jennifer. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Michelle. 2016. Class action over defective DePuy ASR hip replacements settles for $250 million. ABC News Online, March 31. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-03-31/class-action-over-defective-hip-replacements-settles-for-$250m/7288350.Google Scholar
Brownstein, Michael, and Saul, Jennifer Mather, eds. 2016. Implicit bias and philosophy: Metaphysics and epistemology. Vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Caicedo, Marco S., Solver, Edward, Coleman, Latasha, Jacobs, Joshua J., and Hallab, Nadim J. 2017. Females with unexplained joint pain following total joint arthroplasty exhibit a higher rate and severity of hypersensitivity to implant metals compared with males: Implications of sex‐based bioreactivity differences. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 99 (8): 621–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Charbonnier, Caecilia, Chagué, Sylvain, Ponzoni, Matteo, Bernardoni, Massimiliano, Hoffmeyer, Pierre, and Christofilopoulos, Panayiotis. 2014. Sexual activity after total hip arthroplasty: A motion capture study. Journal of Arthroplasty 29 (3): 640–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, Deborah. 2011. Out of joint: the story of the ASR. BMJ 342: d2905.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, Deborah. 2012. How safe are metal‐on‐metal hip implants? BMJ 344: e1410.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, Wesley M., and Walsh, John P. 2007. Real impediments to academic biomedical research. Innovation Policy and the Economy 8: 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cookson, Richard, and Dolan, Paul. 2000. Principles of justice in health care rationing. Journal of Medical Ethics 26 (5): 323–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Currey, H. L. 1970. Osteoarthrosis of the hip joint and sexual activity. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 29 (5): 488.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dahm, Diane L., Jacofsky, David, and Lewallen, David G. 2004. Surgeons rarely discuss sexual activity with patients after THA: A survey of members of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 428: 237–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dean, Megan A., Victor, Elizabeth, and Guidry‐Grimes, Laura. 2016. Inhospitable healthcare spaces: Why diversity training on LGBTQIA issues is not enough. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 13 (4): 557–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dhruva, Sanket S., and Redberg, Rita F. 2012. Evaluating sex differences in medical device clinical trials: Time for action. JAMA 307 (11): 1145–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Few, Roger, Brown, Katrina, and Tompkins, Emma L. 2007. Public participation and climate change adaptation: Avoiding the illusion of inclusion. Climate Policy 7 (1): 46–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Food and Drug Administration (FDA). 1977. General considerations for the clinical evaluation of drugs. Bureau of Drugs Clinical Guidelines Number HEW (FDA) 77–3040.Google Scholar
Food and Drug Administration (FDA). 2014. Evaluation of sex‐specific data in medical device clinical studies: Guidance for industry and Food and Drug Administration staff. https://www.fda.gov/downloads/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/UCM283707.pdf.Google Scholar
Hardin, Garrett. 1968. The tragedy of the commons. Science 162 (3859): 1243–48.Google ScholarPubMed
Harvey, Fiona. 2016. World on track for 3C of warming under current global climate pledges, warns UN. The Guardian November 3. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/nov/03/world-on-track-for-3c-of-warming-under-current-global-climate-pledges-warns-un.Google Scholar
Haughom, Bryan D., Erickson, Brandon J., Hellman, Michael D., and Jacobs, Joshua J. 2015. Do complication rates differ by gender after metal‐on‐metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty? A systematic review. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 473 (8): 2521–29.Google ScholarPubMed
Heller, Michael A., and Eisenberg, Rebecca S. 1998. Can patents deter innovation? The anticommons in biomedical research. Science 280 (5364): 698–701.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hettrich, Carolyn M., Hammoud, Sommer, LaMont, Lauren E., Arendt, Elizabeth A., and Hannafin, Jo A. 2015. Sex‐specific analysis of data in high‐impact orthopaedic journals: How are we doing? Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 473 (12): 3700–04.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holroyd, Jules. 2012. Responsibility for implicit bias. Journal of Social Philosophy 43 (3): 274–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hourdequin, Marion. 2010. Climate, collective action and individual ethical obligations. Environmental Values 19 (4): 443–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchison, Katrina, Rogers, Wendy, and Entwistle, Vikki A. 2017. Addressing deficits and injustices: The potential epistemic contributions of patients to research. Health Care Analysis 25 (4): 386–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inacio, Maria C. S., Ake, Christopher F., Paxton, Elizabeth W., Khatod, Monti, Wang, Cunlin, Gross, Thomas P., Kaczmarek, Ronald G., Marinac‐Dabic, Danica, and Sedrakyan, Art. 2013. Sex and risk of hip implant failure: Assessing total hip arthroplasty outcomes in the United States. JAMA Internal Medicine 173 (6): 435–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
International Organization for Standardization (ISO). 2017. Why get involved in standards development? https://www.iso.org/get-involved.html.Google Scholar
Kahn, Elizabeth. 2014. The tragedy of the commons as an essentially aggregative harm. Journal of Applied Philosophy 31 (3): 223–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, David M. 2006. Can diversity training discriminate? Backlash to lesbian, gay, and bisexual diversity initiatives. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal 18 (1): 61–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirschstein, Ruth L., and Merritt, Dorris H. 1985. Women's health: Report of the Public Health Service Task Force on Women's Health Issues. Public Health Reports 1985: 73–106.Google Scholar
Kozlowski, Desiree, Brooks, Anna, and van der Zwan, Rick. 2016. The disconnect between observers’ male and masculine judgments from sparse gait cues conveying gender: Perceiving precarious manhood. Gender Issues 33 (4): 285–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laffosse, Jean‐Michel, Tricoire, Jean‐Louis, Chiron, Philippe, and Puget, Jean. 2008. Sexual function before and after primary total hip arthroplasty. Joint Bone Spine 75 (2): 189–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lavernia, C. J., and Villa, J. M. 2016. High rates of interest in sex in patients with hip arthritis. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 474 (2): 293–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lawford‐Smith, Holly. 2015. Unethical consumption and obligations to signal. Ethics & International Affairs 29 (3): 315–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenton, Timothy M., Held, Hermann, Kriegler, Elmar, Hall, Jim W., Lucht, Wolfgang, Rahmstorf, Stefan, and Schellnhuber, Hans Joachim. 2008. Tipping elements in the Earth's climate system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105 (6): 1786–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levy, Neil. 2017. Implicit bias and moral responsibility: Probing the data. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 94 (1): 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lichtenberg, Judith. 2010. Negative duties, positive duties, and the “new harms”. Ethics 120 (3): 557–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lichtenberg, Judith. 2014. Distant strangers: Ethics, psychology, and global poverty. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, William Forster. 1833. Two lectures on the checks to population: Delivered before the University of Oxford, in Michaelmas Term 1832. Oxford: J. H. Parker.Google Scholar
Marnach, Mary L., Ramin, Kirk D., Ramsey, Patrick S., Song, Seak‐Whan, Stensland, Jacqueline J., and An, Kai‐Nan. 2003. Characterization of the relationship between joint laxity and maternal hormones in pregnancy. Obstetrics & Gynecology 101 (2): 331–35.Google ScholarPubMed
Matthies, Ashley K., Henckel, Johann, Cro, Suzie, Suarez, Alexander, Noble, Philip C., Skinner, John, and Hart, Alister J. 2014. Predicting wear and blood metal ion levels in metal‐on‐metal hip resurfacing. Journal of Orthopaedic Research 32 (1): 167–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meiri, Rotem, Rosenbaum, Talli Y., and Kalichman, Leonid. 2014. Sexual function before and after total hip replacement: Narrative review. Sexual Medicine 2 (4): 159–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mellon, Stephen J., Grammatopoulos, George, Andersen, Michael S., Pegg, Elise C., Pandit, Hemant G., Murray, David W., and Gill, Harinderjit S. 2013. Individual motion patterns during gait and sit‐to‐stand contribute to edge‐loading risk in metal‐on‐metal hip resurfacing. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine 227 (7): 799–810.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Menchen, Lindsey C., Wein, Alan J., and Smith, Ariana L. 2012. An appraisal of the Food and Drug Administration warning on urogynecologic surgical mesh. Current Urology Reports 13 (3): 231–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Norris, Colleen M., Johnson, Nicole L., Hardwicke‐Brown, Emeleigh, McEwan, Matthew, Pelletier, Roxanne, and Pilote, Louise. 2017. The contribution of gender to apparent sex differences in health status among patients with coronary artery disease. Journal of Women's Health 26 (1): 50–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ostrom, Elinor. 2010. Beyond markets and states: Polycentric governance of complex economic systems. American Economic Review 100 (3): 641–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelletier, Roxanne, Khan, Nadia A., Cox, Jafna, Daskalopoulou, Stella S., Eisenberg, Mark J., Bacon, Simon L., Lavoie, Kim L., et al. 2016. Sex versus gender‐related characteristics: Which predicts outcome after acute coronary syndrome in the young? Journal of the American College of Cardiology 67 (2): 127–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pendry, Louise F., Driscoll, Denise M., and Field, Susannah C. T. 2007. Diversity training: Putting theory into practice. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 80 (1): 27–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Persad, Govind, Wertheimer, Alan, and Emanuel, Ezekiel J. 2009. Principles for allocation of scarce medical interventions. Lancet 373 (9661): 423–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pober, Jordan S., Neuhauser, Crystal S., and Pober, Jeremy M. 2001. Obstacles facing translational research in academic medical centers. TFASEB Journal 15 (13): 2303–13.Google ScholarPubMed
Project Implicit. 2018. Implicit association test preliminary information. https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/takeatest.html.Google Scholar
Rowe, Mary. 1974. Saturn's rings: A study of the minutiae of sexism which maintain discrimination and inhibit affirmative action results in corporations and non‐profit institutions. Graduate and Professional Education of Women.Google Scholar
Rowe, Mary. 1977. The Saturn's rings phenomenon: Micro‐inequities and unequal opportunity in the American economy. In Proceedings of the National Science Foundation's Conference on Women's Leadership and Authority. Santa Cruz: University of California. http://mitsloan.mit.edu/shared/ods/documents/?DocumentID=3983.Google Scholar
Rowe, Mary. 2008. Micro‐affirmations and micro‐inequities. Journal of the International Ombudsman Association 1: 45–48.Google Scholar
Sandhu, Harbinder, Adams, Ann, Singleton, Laura, Clark‐Carter, David, and Kidd, Jane. 2009. The impact of gender dyads on doctor–patient communication: A systematic review. Patient Education and Counselling 76 (3): 348–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saul, Jennifer. 2013. Implicit bias, stereotype threat, and women in philosophy. In Women in philosophy: What needs to change?, ed. Hutchison, Katrina and Jenkins, Fiona. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schattner, Elaine. 2016. Why patients support the 21st century cures act. Forbes Online. November 30. https://www.forbes.com/sites/elaineschattner/2016/11/30/why-patients-support-the-21st-century-cures-act/#7add3a09ac37.Google Scholar
Shah, Syed Ghulam Sarwar, and Robinson, Ian. 2007. Benefits of and barriers to involving users in medical device technology development and evaluation. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 23 (1): 131–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shultz, Sandra J., Sander, T. C., Kirk, S. E., and Perrin, D. H. 2005. Sex differences in knee joint laxity change across the female menstrual cycle. Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 45 (4): 594.Google ScholarPubMed
Silverman, Edward J., Ashley, Blair, and Sheth, Neil P. 2016. Metal‐on‐metal total hip arthroplasty: Is there still a role in 2016? Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine 9 (1): 93–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Alison J., Dieppe, Paul, Vernon, Kelly, Porter, Martyn, and Blom, Ashley W. 2012. Failure rates of stemmed metal‐on‐metal hip replacements: Analysis of data from the National Joint Registry of England and Wales. Lancet 379 (9822): 1199–1204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stern, Steven H., Fuchs, Marc D., Ganz, Sandy B., Classi, Patti, Sculco, Thomas P., and Salvati, Eduardo A. 1991. Sexual function after total hip arthroplasty. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 269 (1991): 228–35.Google Scholar
Therapeutic Goods Administration. 2011. Recall of DePuy Orthopaedics ASR hip replacement device. https://www.tga.gov.au/behind-news/recall-depuy-orthopaedics-asr-hip-replacement-device.Google Scholar
Tiefer, Leonore. 2001. A new view of women's sexual problems: Why new? Why now? Journal of Sex Research 38 (2): 89–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vidaver, Regina M., Lafleur, Bonnie, Tong, Cynthia, Bradshaw, Robynne, and Marts, Sherry A. 2000. Women subjects in NIH‐funded clinical research literature: Lack of progress in both representation and analysis by sex. Journal of Women's Health & Gender‐Based Medicine 9 (5): 495–504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vopat, Bryan G., Kane, Patrick M., Fitzgibbons, Peter G., Got, Christopher J., and Katarincic, Julia A. 2014. Complications associated with retained implants after plate fixation of the pediatric forearm. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 28 (6): 360–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zucker, Irving, and Beery, Annaliese K. 2010. Males still dominate animal studies. Nature 465 (7299): 690.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zusterzeel, Robbert, Selzman, Kimberly A., Sanders, William E., Caños, Daniel A., O'Callaghan, Kathryn M., Carpenter, Jamie L., Piña, Ileana L., and Strauss, David G. 2014. Cardiac resynchronization therapy in women: US Food and Drug Administration meta‐analysis of patient–level data. JAMA Internal Medicine 174 (8): 1340–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed