To read this content please select one of the options below:

Leading school-wide improvement in low-performing schools facing conditions of accountability: Key actions and considerations

Shelby Cosner (Department of Educational Policy Studies, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. USA)
Mary F. Jones (Department of Educational Policy Studies, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA)

Journal of Educational Administration

ISSN: 0957-8234

Article publication date: 1 February 2016

2035

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to advance a framework that identifies three key domains of work and a set of more nuanced considerations and actions within each domain for school leaders seeking to improve school-wide student learning in low-performing schools facing conditions of accountability.

Design/methodology/approach

Review of literature.

Findings

Drawing from the work of Robinson et al. (2008), the authors identify and discuss a set of nuanced considerations and actions for school leaders seeking to improve school-wide student learning in low-performing schools facing conditions of accountability. These considerations and actions fall into three broad domains of leader work: first, goal setting and planning for goal achievement; second, promoting and participating in teacher learning; and third, planning, coordinating, and evaluating teaching and curriculum.

Practical implications

This paper generates implications for school leaders, and school leader developers, school districts, and state departments’ of education. The authors detail two key implications for school districts and/or state departments’ of education as they seek to offer guidance and support to low-performing schools facing conditions of accountability. It also generates a testable framework that can be drawn upon to examine school improvement and the work of school leaders in low-performing schools facing conditions of accountability.

Originality/value

The analysis reveals unique challenges and considerations situated within each of the three domains of leader work found by Robinson et al. (2008) to have moderate to strong effects on student outcomes. These issues motivate an assortment of more nuanced leader actions and considerations in each of the three domains of leader work of consequence to student learning. The analysis provides an important accounting of an assortment of nuanced actions and considerations likely to be necessary if leaders are to support the improvement of student learning in these uniquely challenged settings.

Keywords

Citation

Cosner, S. and Jones, M.F. (2016), "Leading school-wide improvement in low-performing schools facing conditions of accountability: Key actions and considerations", Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. 54 No. 1, pp. 41-57. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-08-2014-0098

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2016, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles