To read this content please select one of the options below:

Types of intragroup conflict and affective reactions

Francisco J. Medina (Department of Social Psychology, University of Seville, Seville, Spain)
Lourdes Munduate (Department of Social Psychology, University of Seville, Seville, Spain)
Miguel A. Dorado (Department of Social Psychology, University of Seville, Seville, Spain)
Inés Martínez (Department of Psychology, University Pablo de Olavide, Seville, Spain)
José M. Guerra (Department of Social Psychology, University of Seville, Seville, Spain)

Journal of Managerial Psychology

ISSN: 0268-3946

Article publication date: 1 April 2005

13688

Abstract

Purpose

Seeks to evaluate the link between task and relationship conflict, and their influence on some employees' affective reactions such as satisfaction, wellbeing, and propensity to leave a job; and to analyse the mediated and moderated role of relationship conflict.

Design/methodology/approach

The study involved 169 employees from six service organizations (hotels) in Andalusia (Spain). A questionnaire was used containing different measures: task and relationship conflict, wellbeing, job satisfaction, and propensity to leave the job.

Findings

The two types of conflict have different consequences. Data show that relationship conflict is negatively associated with affective reactions, while task conflict does not relate directly to affective reactions in a predictable way; relationship conflict has a positive influence on the desire to leave the current job, while task conflict does not affect it negatively; the interactive effect of relationships and task conflict shows that this interaction contributes substantially to predict the propensity to leave the current job; and relationship conflict mediates in the link between task conflict and affective reactions.

Research limitations/implications

A high level of task conflict may backfire by boosting relationship conflict as well, thus having a negative effect on affective reactions. Thus some conclusions can be drawn with a view to improving conflict management in teams. First an attempt must be made to understand the type of conflict that is taking place. Second, managers should encourage open discussion of task‐related issues. Third, special attention should be paid to the level of each conflict because of its interactive effects on some affective outcomes. Thus, in spite of the generally beneficial effects associated with task conflict, the intensification of task‐related conflict may backfire when interacting with dysfunctional affective‐dissent.

Originality/value

Serves too analyze the mediated and moderated role of relationship conflict and to test the role of types of conflict on affective reactions such as wellbeing and propensity to leave the job.

Keywords

Citation

Medina, F.J., Munduate, L., Dorado, M.A., Martínez, I. and Guerra, J.M. (2005), "Types of intragroup conflict and affective reactions", Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol. 20 No. 3/4, pp. 219-230. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940510589019

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2005, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles