Download citation
Download citation
link to html
In the title three-dimensional tetra­zolate-based coordination polymer, poly[bis­(μ3-cyanido-κ3N:C:C)[μ5-5-(pyridin-4-yl)tetra­zol­ato-κ5N:N′:N′′:N′′′:N′′′′]tricopper(I)], [Cu3(C6H4N5)(CN)2]n, there are two types of coordinated CuI atoms. One type exhibits a tetra­hedral environment and the other, residing on a twofold axis, adopts a trigonal coordination environment. The closest Cu...Cu distance is only 2.531 (2) Å, involving a bridging cyanide C atom. All four tetra­zolate and the pyridine N atom of the 4-(pyridin-4-yl)-1H-tetra­zolate anion are coordinated to these CuI atoms and exhibit a μ5-bridging mode. The three-dimensional coordination network can be topologically simplified as a rarely observed (3,3,4,5)-connected network with the Schläfli symbol (4.6.84)2.(42.6.87).(6.82)3.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270112026625/fg3248sup1.cif
Contains datablocks global, I

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270112026625/fg3248Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

CCDC reference: 893484

Comment top

The unique coordination abilities of 5-substituted 1H-tetrazoles such as 5-(2-, 3- or 4-pyridyl)-1H-tetrazole (abbreviated as 2-Hptz, 3-Hptz or 4-Hptz, respectively) to transition metal ions have been used extensively in the construction of functional coordination complexes [metal–organic frameworks (MOF), fluorescent and ferroelectric materials etc. (Xiong et al., 2002; Jiang et al., 2004; Ye et al., 2005; Li et al., 2009; Ouellette & Zubieta 2009; Song et al., 2010)]. By controlling the reaction conditions, such as the temperature, the pH of the medium and the solvent used, the tetrazole group can be coordinated to metal centres in µ1-, µ2-, µ3- or µ4-modes (Wang et al., 2005; Yang et al., 2009). However, µ4-bridging coordination complexes are apparently less [common?] than the other three, which may be due to the spatial hindrance of the tetrazole group. A search for 5-substituted tetrazolate metal–organic complexes in the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD, version 5.33 plus Feb 1 2012 update; Allen, 2002) yielded 1183 hits, of which there were only 24 complexes where the tetrazolate anions adopt a µ4-bridging mode (ca 2.0% of all the complexes). With the aim of preparing novel µ4-bridge-based tetrazolate metal–organic complexes where the tetrazole group can be generated from an in situ reaction (Yang et al., 2009), we have used 4-cyanopyridine, NaN3 and CuCN as the raw materials under hydrothermal conditions to give the title novel metal coordination polymer, (I), and report its crystal structure here.

Complex (I) crystallizes in the monoclinic C2/c space group, with the asymmetric unit consisting of one and a half CuI cations, half a 4-ptz anion and a whole CN- anion, with atoms Cu2, N3, C3 and C4 residing on a twofold rotation axis (Fig. 1). The pyridyl group in the 4-ptz anion is moderately twisted away from the tetrazole group, with a dihedral angle of 45.0 (1)° between them. For the central Cu atoms, the Cu1 coordination environment is a distorted tetrahedron, with Cu—N/C bond lengths in the range 1.973 (3)–2.090 (2) Å. As far as atom Cu2 is concerned, although a very long inter-atomic contact of 2.870 (3) Å exists between Cu2 and N2(x - 1/2, -y + 5/2, z - 1/2), its coordination environment can be best described as planar–trigonal, with the metal atom residing completely in the plane and with bond distances of 2.018 (3) and 2.068 (3) Å for Cu2—N2(x - 1/2, y + 1/2, z - 1) and Cu2—C5(-x + 3/2, y + 1/2, -z + 3/2), respectively (Table 1). It is worth mentioning that all five N atoms in the 4-ptz anion are coordinated to these CuI centres, with the four tetrazole N atoms coordinated only to Cu1 and the pyridyl N atom bonded only to Cu2. Atom N4 of the CN- anion is coordinated to Cu1 at one end and, at the other end, to Cu1 and Cu2 simultaneously through atom C5, with a Cu1···Cu2 distance of only 2.531 (1) Å, which is comparable with some analogues (Qin et al., 2011; Zhou et al., 2009).

In the crystal packing of (I), a three-dimensional coordination network is formed (Fig. 2a). The network can be analysed in terms of three aspects. Firstly, via the coordination of only a 4-ptz anion to Cu1 and Cu2, these two types of ionic components are linked into a one-dimensional chain running parallel to the [101] direction (Fig. 2b). Secondly, via the µ2 coordination of cyano atom C5 to adjacent [101] chains, a two-dimensional layer structure runs parallel to the (101) plane, in which the CuI cations are arrayed alternately, separated by 4-ptz anions (Fig. 2b). Thirdly, adjacent (101) layers are joined together through the coordination of up and down cyano atoms N4 of the (101) plane to the Cu1 centres, forming a three-dimensional network.

To better understand this network from a topological view, the Cu1, Cu2, CN- and 4-ptz ions can be regarded as 4-, 3-, 3- and 5-connected nodes. Thus, the whole network can be simplified as a (3,3,4,5)-connected topological network with the Schläfli symbol (4.6.84)2.(42.6.87).(6.82)3 (Fig. 3). This is a new kind of topological network, according to analysis by TOPOS (Blatov, 2006). In comparison, Wang et al. (2009) have recently conducted an experiment using almost identical reactants to this work, with only CuCN replaced by CuBr. However, they obtained a completely different three-dimensional metal–organic polymer with a generally observed (3,4)-connected topological network. From this, we conclude that subtle alteration of the reaction conditions in a hydrothermal reaction may lead to entirely different products.

The spectroscopic characteristics of (I) were also investigated. The absorption band around 3437 cm- in its IR absorption spectrum can be assigned to the stretching vibration of the aromatic C—H bonds, and the band at 2062 cm-1 to the classical stretching vibration of the CN bond of the CN-1 anion. In its solid luminescent spectrum upon excitation at 346 nm, (I) shows two emission peaks at 363 and 435 nm. The former can be attributed to ligand-to-metal charge transfer (LMCT) and the latter should be largely attributed to intra-ligand ππ* fluorescent emission (Huang et al., 2006).

Related literature top

For related literature, see: Allen (2002); Blatov (2006); Huang et al. (2006); Jiang et al. (2004); Li et al. (2009); Ouellette & Zubieta (2009); Qin et al. (2011); Song et al. (2010); Wang et al. (2005, 2009); Xiong et al. (2002); Yang et al. (2009); Ye et al. (2005); Zhou et al. (2009).

Experimental top

All reagents and solvents were used as obtained without further purification. Equivalent molar amounts of 4-cyanopyridine (0.052 g, 0.5 mmol), NaN3 (0.033 g, 0.5 mmol) and CuCN (1.5 mmol, 0.13 g) were mixed in water (15 ml). The mixture was stirred for 10 min at ambient temperature and then heated in a 23 ml capacity Teflon-lined reaction vessel at 433 K for 3 d. After slow cooling to room temperature at a rate of 5 K h-1, the product was collected manually, washed with water and air-dried to give colourless block-shaped crystals of (I) (yield 0.03 g).

Refinement top

C-bound H atoms were positioned geometrically, with C—H = 0.93 Å, and treated as riding, with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C).

Structure description top

The unique coordination abilities of 5-substituted 1H-tetrazoles such as 5-(2-, 3- or 4-pyridyl)-1H-tetrazole (abbreviated as 2-Hptz, 3-Hptz or 4-Hptz, respectively) to transition metal ions have been used extensively in the construction of functional coordination complexes [metal–organic frameworks (MOF), fluorescent and ferroelectric materials etc. (Xiong et al., 2002; Jiang et al., 2004; Ye et al., 2005; Li et al., 2009; Ouellette & Zubieta 2009; Song et al., 2010)]. By controlling the reaction conditions, such as the temperature, the pH of the medium and the solvent used, the tetrazole group can be coordinated to metal centres in µ1-, µ2-, µ3- or µ4-modes (Wang et al., 2005; Yang et al., 2009). However, µ4-bridging coordination complexes are apparently less [common?] than the other three, which may be due to the spatial hindrance of the tetrazole group. A search for 5-substituted tetrazolate metal–organic complexes in the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD, version 5.33 plus Feb 1 2012 update; Allen, 2002) yielded 1183 hits, of which there were only 24 complexes where the tetrazolate anions adopt a µ4-bridging mode (ca 2.0% of all the complexes). With the aim of preparing novel µ4-bridge-based tetrazolate metal–organic complexes where the tetrazole group can be generated from an in situ reaction (Yang et al., 2009), we have used 4-cyanopyridine, NaN3 and CuCN as the raw materials under hydrothermal conditions to give the title novel metal coordination polymer, (I), and report its crystal structure here.

Complex (I) crystallizes in the monoclinic C2/c space group, with the asymmetric unit consisting of one and a half CuI cations, half a 4-ptz anion and a whole CN- anion, with atoms Cu2, N3, C3 and C4 residing on a twofold rotation axis (Fig. 1). The pyridyl group in the 4-ptz anion is moderately twisted away from the tetrazole group, with a dihedral angle of 45.0 (1)° between them. For the central Cu atoms, the Cu1 coordination environment is a distorted tetrahedron, with Cu—N/C bond lengths in the range 1.973 (3)–2.090 (2) Å. As far as atom Cu2 is concerned, although a very long inter-atomic contact of 2.870 (3) Å exists between Cu2 and N2(x - 1/2, -y + 5/2, z - 1/2), its coordination environment can be best described as planar–trigonal, with the metal atom residing completely in the plane and with bond distances of 2.018 (3) and 2.068 (3) Å for Cu2—N2(x - 1/2, y + 1/2, z - 1) and Cu2—C5(-x + 3/2, y + 1/2, -z + 3/2), respectively (Table 1). It is worth mentioning that all five N atoms in the 4-ptz anion are coordinated to these CuI centres, with the four tetrazole N atoms coordinated only to Cu1 and the pyridyl N atom bonded only to Cu2. Atom N4 of the CN- anion is coordinated to Cu1 at one end and, at the other end, to Cu1 and Cu2 simultaneously through atom C5, with a Cu1···Cu2 distance of only 2.531 (1) Å, which is comparable with some analogues (Qin et al., 2011; Zhou et al., 2009).

In the crystal packing of (I), a three-dimensional coordination network is formed (Fig. 2a). The network can be analysed in terms of three aspects. Firstly, via the coordination of only a 4-ptz anion to Cu1 and Cu2, these two types of ionic components are linked into a one-dimensional chain running parallel to the [101] direction (Fig. 2b). Secondly, via the µ2 coordination of cyano atom C5 to adjacent [101] chains, a two-dimensional layer structure runs parallel to the (101) plane, in which the CuI cations are arrayed alternately, separated by 4-ptz anions (Fig. 2b). Thirdly, adjacent (101) layers are joined together through the coordination of up and down cyano atoms N4 of the (101) plane to the Cu1 centres, forming a three-dimensional network.

To better understand this network from a topological view, the Cu1, Cu2, CN- and 4-ptz ions can be regarded as 4-, 3-, 3- and 5-connected nodes. Thus, the whole network can be simplified as a (3,3,4,5)-connected topological network with the Schläfli symbol (4.6.84)2.(42.6.87).(6.82)3 (Fig. 3). This is a new kind of topological network, according to analysis by TOPOS (Blatov, 2006). In comparison, Wang et al. (2009) have recently conducted an experiment using almost identical reactants to this work, with only CuCN replaced by CuBr. However, they obtained a completely different three-dimensional metal–organic polymer with a generally observed (3,4)-connected topological network. From this, we conclude that subtle alteration of the reaction conditions in a hydrothermal reaction may lead to entirely different products.

The spectroscopic characteristics of (I) were also investigated. The absorption band around 3437 cm- in its IR absorption spectrum can be assigned to the stretching vibration of the aromatic C—H bonds, and the band at 2062 cm-1 to the classical stretching vibration of the CN bond of the CN-1 anion. In its solid luminescent spectrum upon excitation at 346 nm, (I) shows two emission peaks at 363 and 435 nm. The former can be attributed to ligand-to-metal charge transfer (LMCT) and the latter should be largely attributed to intra-ligand ππ* fluorescent emission (Huang et al., 2006).

For related literature, see: Allen (2002); Blatov (2006); Huang et al. (2006); Jiang et al. (2004); Li et al. (2009); Ouellette & Zubieta (2009); Qin et al. (2011); Song et al. (2010); Wang et al. (2005, 2009); Xiong et al. (2002); Yang et al. (2009); Ye et al. (2005); Zhou et al. (2009).

Computing details top

Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2002); cell refinement: SMART (Bruker, 2002); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2002); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: XCIF (Sheldrick, 2008).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The molecular structure of (I), showing the atom-numbering scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level. [Symmetry codes: (i) -x + 3/2, -y + 3/2, -z + 1; (ii) x, -y + 2, z - 1/2; (iii) x - 1/2, y + 1/2, z - 1; (iv) -x + 3/2, y + 1/2, -z + 3/2.]
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. (a) Part of the crystal structure of (I), showing the formation of the three-dimensional coordination network linked by CN- anions coordinated to CuI centres in adjacent adjacent (101) layers. (b) Part of the crystal structure of (I), showing the two-dimensional layer parallel to the (101) plane formed by the coordination of the five N atoms of the 4-ptz anion and the C atoms of the CN- anions.
[Figure 3] Fig. 3. The simplified (3,3,4,5)-connected topological network when Cu2, a CN- anion, Cu1 and a 4-ptz anion are regarded as 3-, 3-, 4- and 5-connected nodes, respectively. (In the electronic version of the paper, the cyan, grey and blue spheres represent the CuI cation, CN- anion and 4-ptz anion, respectively.)
poly[bis(µ3-cyanido-κ3N:C:C)[µ5-5-(pyridin-4- yl)tetrazolato- κ5N:N':N'':N''':N'''']tricopper(I)] top
Crystal data top
[Cu3(C6H4N5)(CN)2]F(000) = 752
Mr = 388.80Dx = 2.563 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -C 2ycCell parameters from 2074 reflections
a = 12.4823 (19) Åθ = 2.7–28.2°
b = 11.8834 (18) ŵ = 6.26 mm1
c = 8.7986 (13) ÅT = 298 K
β = 129.467 (2)°Block, colourless
V = 1007.5 (3) Å30.13 × 0.12 × 0.11 mm
Z = 4
Data collection top
Bruker SMART APEX CCD area-detector
diffractometer
1245 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1135 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.051
φ and ω scansθmax = 28.3°, θmin = 2.7°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 2008)
h = 1216
Tmin = 0.497, Tmax = 0.573k = 1512
3717 measured reflectionsl = 1111
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.028Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.066H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.06 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0269P)2 + 0.8565P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1245 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
84 parametersΔρmax = 0.69 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = 0.46 e Å3
Crystal data top
[Cu3(C6H4N5)(CN)2]V = 1007.5 (3) Å3
Mr = 388.80Z = 4
Monoclinic, C2/cMo Kα radiation
a = 12.4823 (19) ŵ = 6.26 mm1
b = 11.8834 (18) ÅT = 298 K
c = 8.7986 (13) Å0.13 × 0.12 × 0.11 mm
β = 129.467 (2)°
Data collection top
Bruker SMART APEX CCD area-detector
diffractometer
1245 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 2008)
1135 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.497, Tmax = 0.573Rint = 0.051
3717 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0280 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.066H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.06Δρmax = 0.69 e Å3
1245 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.46 e Å3
84 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2sigma(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R-factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Cu10.81651 (3)0.90261 (3)0.58978 (4)0.01605 (12)
Cu20.50001.44509 (4)0.25000.02132 (14)
N10.6132 (2)0.85232 (18)0.3714 (3)0.0146 (4)
N20.5675 (2)0.74555 (17)0.3216 (3)0.0153 (4)
N30.50001.2753 (3)0.25000.0246 (8)
N40.8265 (2)0.9495 (2)0.8172 (3)0.0202 (5)
C10.4296 (3)1.2158 (2)0.0814 (4)0.0250 (6)
H10.38051.25510.03680.030*
C20.4266 (3)1.0998 (2)0.0749 (4)0.0215 (6)
H20.37611.06230.04510.026*
C30.50001.0397 (3)0.25000.0152 (7)
C40.50000.9158 (3)0.25000.0143 (7)
C50.8501 (3)0.9868 (2)0.9564 (4)0.0167 (5)
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Cu10.01555 (19)0.01460 (19)0.01400 (17)0.00088 (12)0.00751 (14)0.00055 (12)
Cu20.0240 (3)0.0121 (2)0.0138 (2)0.0000.0054 (2)0.000
N10.0137 (11)0.0099 (10)0.0155 (10)0.0012 (8)0.0070 (9)0.0005 (8)
N20.0144 (11)0.0105 (10)0.0159 (10)0.0002 (9)0.0072 (9)0.0000 (8)
N30.031 (2)0.0128 (17)0.0200 (16)0.0000.0112 (15)0.000
N40.0220 (12)0.0188 (12)0.0158 (10)0.0051 (9)0.0102 (9)0.0015 (9)
C10.0289 (16)0.0159 (14)0.0172 (13)0.0001 (12)0.0085 (12)0.0028 (10)
C20.0251 (15)0.0134 (13)0.0174 (12)0.0024 (11)0.0095 (12)0.0026 (10)
C30.0130 (17)0.0097 (17)0.0193 (17)0.0000.0085 (14)0.000
C40.0150 (18)0.0098 (17)0.0139 (16)0.0000.0073 (14)0.000
C50.0161 (12)0.0159 (13)0.0170 (12)0.0024 (10)0.0101 (10)0.0024 (10)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Cu1—N12.071 (2)N3—C11.347 (3)
Cu1—N2i2.090 (2)N4—C51.150 (3)
Cu1—N42.003 (2)C1—C21.380 (4)
Cu1—C5ii1.977 (3)C1—H10.9300
Cu2—N32.018 (3)C2—C31.388 (3)
Cu2—C5iii2.068 (2)C2—H20.9300
Cu2—C5iv2.068 (2)C3—C41.472 (5)
N1—C41.337 (3)C4—N1v1.337 (3)
N1—N21.345 (3)C5—Cu1vi1.976 (3)
N2—N2v1.315 (4)C5—Cu2vii2.068 (2)
N2—Cu1i2.090 (2)
C5ii—Cu1—N1103.80 (10)N2v—N2—N1109.38 (13)
C5ii—Cu1—N2i115.05 (10)N2v—N2—Cu1i121.30 (7)
C5ii—Cu1—N4120.41 (10)N1—N2—Cu1i128.57 (16)
N1—Cu1—N2i104.64 (8)C1v—N3—C1116.8 (3)
N4—Cu1—N1105.57 (10)C1v—N3—Cu2121.62 (17)
N4—Cu1—N2i105.85 (9)C1—N3—Cu2121.62 (17)
N3—Cu2—C5iii103.88 (8)C5—N4—Cu1168.9 (2)
N3—Cu2—C5iv103.88 (8)N3—C1—C2123.5 (3)
C5iii—Cu2—C5iv152.25 (15)N3—C1—H1118.3
C5ii—Cu1—Cu2viii52.90 (7)C2—C1—H1118.3
N4—Cu1—Cu2viii77.57 (7)C1—C2—C3119.1 (3)
N1—Cu1—Cu2viii149.83 (6)C1—C2—H2120.5
N2i—Cu1—Cu2viii103.16 (6)C3—C2—H2120.5
N3—Cu2—Cu1ix135.659 (12)C2—C3—C2v118.1 (3)
C5iii—Cu2—Cu1ix49.67 (7)C2—C3—C4120.93 (17)
C5iv—Cu2—Cu1ix107.71 (8)C2v—C3—C4120.93 (17)
N3—Cu2—Cu1viii135.658 (12)N1v—C4—N1111.3 (3)
C5iii—Cu2—Cu1viii107.71 (8)N1v—C4—C3124.35 (15)
C5iv—Cu2—Cu1viii49.67 (7)N1—C4—C3124.35 (15)
Cu1ix—Cu2—Cu1viii88.68 (2)N4—C5—Cu1vi151.7 (2)
C4—N1—N2105.0 (2)N4—C5—Cu2vii130.8 (2)
C4—N1—Cu1128.88 (18)Cu1vi—C5—Cu2vii77.43 (9)
N2—N1—Cu1126.16 (16)
C5ii—Cu1—N1—C450.18 (19)C5ii—Cu1—N4—C539.1 (12)
N4—Cu1—N1—C477.37 (19)N1—Cu1—N4—C5155.9 (11)
N2i—Cu1—N1—C4171.17 (16)N2i—Cu1—N4—C593.5 (12)
Cu2viii—Cu1—N1—C414.6 (3)Cu2viii—Cu1—N4—C56.9 (11)
C5ii—Cu1—N1—N2129.5 (2)C1v—N3—C1—C20.2 (2)
N4—Cu1—N1—N2103.0 (2)Cu2—N3—C1—C2179.8 (2)
N2i—Cu1—N1—N28.5 (3)N3—C1—C2—C30.4 (5)
Cu2viii—Cu1—N1—N2165.05 (14)C1—C2—C3—C2v0.2 (2)
C4—N1—N2—N2v0.9 (3)C1—C2—C3—C4179.8 (2)
Cu1—N1—N2—N2v179.38 (19)N2—N1—C4—N1v0.33 (11)
C4—N1—N2—Cu1i169.20 (13)Cu1—N1—C4—N1v179.9 (2)
Cu1—N1—N2—Cu1i10.5 (3)N2—N1—C4—C3179.67 (11)
C5iii—Cu2—N3—C1v170.24 (18)Cu1—N1—C4—C30.1 (2)
C5iv—Cu2—N3—C1v9.76 (18)C2—C3—C4—N1v44.69 (19)
Cu1ix—Cu2—N3—C1v124.75 (16)C2v—C3—C4—N1v135.31 (19)
Cu1viii—Cu2—N3—C1v55.25 (16)C2—C3—C4—N1135.31 (19)
C5iii—Cu2—N3—C19.76 (18)C2v—C3—C4—N144.69 (19)
C5iv—Cu2—N3—C1170.24 (18)Cu1—N4—C5—Cu1vi97.6 (12)
Cu1ix—Cu2—N3—C155.25 (16)Cu1—N4—C5—Cu2vii79.0 (12)
Cu1viii—Cu2—N3—C1124.75 (16)
Symmetry codes: (i) x+3/2, y+3/2, z+1; (ii) x, y+2, z1/2; (iii) x1/2, y+1/2, z1; (iv) x+3/2, y+1/2, z+3/2; (v) x+1, y, z+1/2; (vi) x, y+2, z+1/2; (vii) x+1/2, y1/2, z+1; (viii) x+3/2, y+5/2, z+1; (ix) x1/2, y+5/2, z1/2.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula[Cu3(C6H4N5)(CN)2]
Mr388.80
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, C2/c
Temperature (K)298
a, b, c (Å)12.4823 (19), 11.8834 (18), 8.7986 (13)
β (°) 129.467 (2)
V3)1007.5 (3)
Z4
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)6.26
Crystal size (mm)0.13 × 0.12 × 0.11
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker SMART APEX CCD area-detector
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 2008)
Tmin, Tmax0.497, 0.573
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
3717, 1245, 1135
Rint0.051
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.666
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.028, 0.066, 1.06
No. of reflections1245
No. of parameters84
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.69, 0.46

Computer programs: SMART (Bruker, 2002), SAINT (Bruker, 2002), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2008), XCIF (Sheldrick, 2008).

Selected geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Cu1—N12.071 (2)Cu1—C5ii1.977 (3)
Cu1—N2i2.090 (2)Cu2—N32.018 (3)
Cu1—N42.003 (2)Cu2—C5iii2.068 (2)
C5ii—Cu1—N1103.80 (10)N4—Cu1—N1105.57 (10)
C5ii—Cu1—N2i115.05 (10)N4—Cu1—N2i105.85 (9)
C5ii—Cu1—N4120.41 (10)N3—Cu2—C5iii103.88 (8)
N1—Cu1—N2i104.64 (8)C5iii—Cu2—C5iv152.25 (15)
Symmetry codes: (i) x+3/2, y+3/2, z+1; (ii) x, y+2, z1/2; (iii) x1/2, y+1/2, z1; (iv) x+3/2, y+1/2, z+3/2.
 

Follow Acta Cryst. C
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds