Abstract
A Comment on the Letter by D. S. Kim et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 1002 (1992).
- Received 12 August 1993
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.1571
©1994 American Physical Society
A Comment on the Letter by D. S. Kim et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 1002 (1992).
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.1571
©1994 American Physical Society