Abstract
A Comment on the Letter by T. Roger et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 162502 (2012). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.
- Received 1 June 2012
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.189201
© 2012 American Physical Society
A Comment on the Letter by T. Roger et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 162502 (2012). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.189201
© 2012 American Physical Society