Abstract
A Comment on the Letter by M. Rupp et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 108, 058301 (2012). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.
- Received 6 February 2012
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.059801
© 2012 American Physical Society
A Comment on the Letter by M. Rupp et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 108, 058301 (2012). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.059801
© 2012 American Physical Society