Structural study of helical polyfluorene under high quasihydrostatic pressure

M. Knaapila, Z. Konôpková, M. Torkkeli, D. Haase, H.-P. Liermann, S. Guha, and U. Scherf
Phys. Rev. E 87, 022602 – Published 19 February 2013

Abstract

We report on an x-ray diffraction (XRD) study of helical poly[9,9-bis(2-ethylhexyl)fluorene] (PF2/6) under high quasihydrostatic pressure and show an effect of pressure on the torsion angle (dihedral angle) between adjunct repeat units and on the hexagonal unit cell. A model for helical backbone conformation is constructed. The theoretical position for the most prominent 00l x-ray reflection is calculated as a function of torsion angle. The XRD of high molecular weight PF2/6 (Mn=30 kg/mol) is measured through a diamond anvil cell upon pressure increase from 1 to 10 GPa. The theoretically considered 00l reflection is experimentally identified, and its shift with the increasing pressure is found to be consistent with the decreasing torsion angle between 2 and 6 GPa. This indicates partial backbone planarization towards a more open helical structure. The h00 peak is identified, and its shift together with the broadening of 00l implies impairment of the ambient hexagonal order, which begins at or below 2 GPa. Previously collected high-pressure photoluminescence data are reanalyzed and are found to be qualitatively consistent with the XRD data. This paper provides an example of how the helical π-conjugated backbone structure can be controlled by applying high quasihydrostatic pressure without modifications in its chemical structure. Moreover, it paves the way for wider use of high-pressure x-ray scattering in the research of π-conjugated polymers.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
1 More
  • Received 5 October 2012

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.87.022602

©2013 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

M. Knaapila1,*, Z. Konôpková2, M. Torkkeli3, D. Haase4, H.-P. Liermann2, S. Guha5, and U. Scherf6

  • 1Physics Department, Institute for Energy Technology, Kjeller NO-2027, Norway
  • 2DESY Photon Science, Hamburg D-22607, Germany
  • 3Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki FI-00014, Finland
  • 4MAX IV-Laboratory, Lund University, Lund SE-22100, Sweden
  • 5Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri 65211, USA
  • 6Macromolecular Chemistry Group, Bergische Universität Wuppertal, Wuppertal D-42119, Germany

  • *Author to whom correspondence should be addressed: matti.knaapila@ife.no

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 87, Iss. 2 — February 2013

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review E

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×