Testing for nonlinearity in nonstationary time series: A network-based surrogate data test

M. C. Mallika, S. Suriya Prabhaa, K. Asokan, K. S. Anil Kumar, T. R. Ramamohan, and K. Satheesh Kumar
Phys. Rev. E 104, 054217 – Published 30 November 2021

Abstract

The classical surrogate data tests, which are used to differentiate linear noise processes from nonlinear processes, are not suitable for nonstationary time series. In this paper, we propose a surrogate data test that can be applied on both stationary time series as well as nonstationary time series with short-term fluctuations. The method is based on the idea of constructing a network from the time series, employing a generalized symbolic dynamics method introduced in this work, and using any one of the several easily computable network parameters as discriminating statistics. The construction of the network is designed to remove the long-term trends in the data automatically. The network-based test statistics pick up only the short-term variations, unlike the discriminating statistics of the traditional methods, which are influenced by nonstationary trends in the data. The method is tested on several systems generated by linear or nonlinear processes and with deterministic or stochastic trends, and in all cases it is found to be able to differentiate between linear stochastic processes and nonlinear processes quite accurately, especially in cases where the common methods would lead to false rejections of the null hypothesis due to nonstationarity being interpreted as nonlinearity. The method is also found to be robust to the presence of experimental or dynamical noise of a moderate level in an otherwise nonlinear system.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
2 More
  • Received 12 September 2021
  • Accepted 17 November 2021

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.104.054217

©2021 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Nonlinear DynamicsNetworks

Authors & Affiliations

M. C. Mallika*

  • Department of Futures Studies, University of Kerala, Kariavattom, Kerala 695 581, India

S. Suriya Prabhaa

  • Department of Futures Studies, University of Kerala, Kariavattom, Kerala 695 581, India

K. Asokan

  • Department of Mathematics, College of Engineering, Trivandrum, Kerala 695 016, India

K. S. Anil Kumar§

  • University of Kerala, Palayam, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala 695 034, India

T. R. Ramamohan

  • Department of Chemical Engineering, M. S. Ramaiah Institute of Technology, MSR Nagar, Bangalore 560 054, India

K. Satheesh Kumar

  • Department of Futures Studies, University of Kerala, Kariavattom, Kerala 695 581, India

  • *mallikasasi@gmail.com
  • suriyaprabhaa4@gmail.com
  • asokank@cet.ac.in
  • §ksanilksitm@gmail.com
  • trr@msrit.edu
  • kskumar@keralauniversity.ac.in

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 104, Iss. 5 — November 2021

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review E

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×