Uncovering multiple CP-nonconserving mechanisms of (ββ)0ν decay

Amand Faessler, A. Meroni, S. T. Petcov, F. Šimkovic, and J. Vergados
Phys. Rev. D 83, 113003 – Published 7 June 2011

Abstract

We consider the possibility of several different mechanisms contributing to the (ββ)0ν-decay amplitude in the general case of CP nonconservation: light Majorana neutrino exchange, heavy left-handed and heavy right-handed Majorana neutrino exchanges, lepton charge nonconserving couplings in supersymmetry theories with R-parity breaking. If the (ββ)0ν decay is induced by, e.g., two “noninterfering” mechanisms (light Majorana neutrino and heavy right-handed Majorana neutrino exchanges), one can determine |ηi|2 and |ηj|2, ηi and ηj being the two fundamental parameters characterizing these mechanisms, from data on the half-lives of two nuclear isotopes. In the case when two “interfering” mechanisms are responsible for the (ββ)0ν decay, |ηi|2 and |ηj|2 and the interference term can be uniquely determined, in principle, from data on the half-lives of three nuclei. Given the half-life of one isotope, the “positivity conditions” |ηi|20 and |ηj|20 lead to stringent constraints on the half-lives of the other (ββ)0ν-decaying isotopes. These conditions, as well as the conditions for constructive (destructive) interference are derived and their implications are analyzed in two specific cases. The experimental limits on neutrino masses obtained in the H3 β-decay experiments can constrain further the multiple mechanisms of (ββ)0ν decay if one of the mechanisms involved is the light Majorana neutrino exchange. The measurements of the half-lives with rather high precision and the knowledge of the relevant nuclear matrix elements with relatively small uncertainties is crucial for establishing that more than one mechanism are operative in (ββ)0ν decay. The method considered by us can be generalized to the case of more than two (ββ)0ν-decay mechanisms. It allows us to treat the cases of CP conserving and CP nonconserving couplings generating the (ββ)0ν decay in a unique way.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
6 More
  • Received 31 March 2011

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.83.113003

© 2011 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

Amand Faessler1, A. Meroni2,3, S. T. Petcov2,3,4,*, F. Šimkovic5,6, and J. Vergados7

  • 1Institute of Theoretical Physics, University of Tuebingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany
  • 2SISSA, Via Bonomea 265, 34136 Trieste, Italy
  • 3Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Trieste, Via Valerio 2, 34126 Trieste, Italy
  • 4IPMU, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
  • 5Department of Nuclear Physics and Biophysics, Comenius University, Mlynska dolina F1, SK-842 15 Bratislava, Slovakia
  • 6Bogoliubov Laboratory of Theoretical Physics, JINR, 141980 Dubna, Moscow region, Russia
  • 7Theoretical Physics Devision, University of Ioannina, GR-451 10 Ioannina, Greece

  • *Also at: Institute of Nuclear Research and Nuclear Energy, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1784 Sofia, Bulgaria

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 83, Iss. 11 — 1 June 2011

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review D

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×