Complexity Phase Diagram for Interacting and Long-Range Bosonic Hamiltonians

Nishad Maskara, Abhinav Deshpande, Adam Ehrenberg, Minh C. Tran, Bill Fefferman, and Alexey V. Gorshkov
Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 150604 – Published 7 October 2022
PDFHTMLExport Citation

Abstract

We classify phases of a bosonic lattice model based on the computational complexity of classically simulating the system. We show that the system transitions from being classically simulable to classically hard to simulate as it evolves in time, extending previous results to include on-site number-conserving interactions and long-range hopping. Specifically, we construct a complexity phase diagram with easy and hard “phases” and derive analytic bounds on the location of the phase boundary with respect to the evolution time and the degree of locality. We find that the location of the phase transition is intimately related to upper bounds on the spread of quantum correlations and protocols to transfer quantum information. Remarkably, although the location of the transition point is unchanged by on-site interactions, the nature of the transition point does change. Specifically, we find that there are two kinds of transitions, sharp and coarse, broadly corresponding to interacting and noninteracting bosons, respectively. Our Letter motivates future studies of complexity in many-body systems and its interplay with the associated physical phenomena.

  • Figure
  • Received 15 June 2019
  • Revised 18 May 2022
  • Accepted 12 September 2022

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.150604

© 2022 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Atomic, Molecular & OpticalQuantum Information, Science & Technology

Authors & Affiliations

Nishad Maskara1,2,*, Abhinav Deshpande2,3,4,*, Adam Ehrenberg2,3, Minh C. Tran2,3,5, Bill Fefferman2,6,7, and Alexey V. Gorshkov2,3

  • 1Department of Physics, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, USA
  • 2Joint Center for Quantum Information and Computer Science, NIST/University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA
  • 3Joint Quantum Institute, NIST/University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA
  • 4Institute for Quantum Information and Matter, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, USA
  • 5Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106, USA
  • 6Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
  • 7Department of Computer Science, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA

  • *These authors contributed equally to this work.

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

Supplemental Material (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 129, Iss. 15 — 7 October 2022

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article Available via CHORUS

Download Accepted Manuscript
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review Letters

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×