Magnetic frustration in lead pyrochlores

A. M. Hallas, A. M. Arevalo-Lopez, A. Z. Sharma, T. Munsie, J. P. Attfield, C. R. Wiebe, and G. M. Luke
Phys. Rev. B 91, 104417 – Published 19 March 2015

Abstract

The rich phase diagrams of magnetically frustrated pyrochlores have maintained a high level of interest over the past 20 years. To experimentally explore these phase diagrams requires a means of tuning the relevant interactions. One approach to achieve this is chemical pressure, that is, varying the size of the nonmagnetic cation. Here, we report on the family of lead-based pyrochlores A2Pb2O7 (A = Pr, Nd, Gd), which we have characterized with magnetic susceptibility and specific heat. Lead is the largest known possible B-site cation for the pyrochlore lattice. Thus, these materials significantly expand the phase space of the frustrated pyrochlores. Pr2Pb2O7 has an absence of long-range magnetic order down to 400 mK and a spin-ice-like heat capacity anomaly at 1.2 K. Thus, Pr2Pb2O7 is a candidate for a quantum spin ice state, despite weaker exchange. Nd2Pb2O7 transitions to a magnetically ordered state at 0.41 K. The Weiss temperature for Nd2Pb2O7 is θCW=0.06 K, indicating close competition between ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic interactions. Gd2Pb2O7 is a Heisenberg antiferromagnet that transitions to long-range magnetic order at 0.81 K, in spite of significant site mixing. Below its ordering transition, we find a T3/2 heat capacity dependence in Gd2Pb2O7, indication of a ground state that is distinct from other gadolinium pyrochlores. These lead-based pyrochlores provide insight into the effects of weakened exchange on highly frustrated lattices and represent further realizations of several exotic magnetic ground states which can test theoretical models.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
6 More
  • Received 16 December 2014

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.91.104417

©2015 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

A. M. Hallas1, A. M. Arevalo-Lopez2, A. Z. Sharma3, T. Munsie1, J. P. Attfield2, C. R. Wiebe1,3,4,5, and G. M. Luke1,5,*

  • 1Department of Physics and Astronomy, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4M1, Canada
  • 2Centre for Science at Extreme Conditions and School of Chemistry, University of Edinburgh, Peter Guthrie Tait Road, King's Buildings, Edinburgh EH9 3FD, United Kingdom
  • 3Department of Chemistry, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 2N2, Canada
  • 4Department of Chemistry, University of Winnipeg, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3B 2E9, Canada
  • 5Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, 180 Dundas Street West, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1Z7, Canada

  • *Corresponding author: luke@mcmaster.ca

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 91, Iss. 10 — 1 March 2015

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×