Electric field control of antiferroelectric domain pattern

S. B. Vakhrushev, D. Andronikova, Iu. Bronwald, E. Yu. Koroleva, D. Chernyshov, A. V. Filimonov, S. A. Udovenko, A. I. Rudskoy, D. Ishikawa, A. Q. R. Baron, A. Bosak, I. N. Leontiev, and Alexander K. Tagantsev
Phys. Rev. B 103, 214108 – Published 14 June 2021
PDFHTMLExport Citation

Abstract

Control of domain and domain wall configurations in antiferroelectrics is a necessary step towards practical use of new functionalities based on polar domain wall structures. Here we propose and demonstrate a domain engineering scheme that provides an antiferroelectric state with only one type of orientational domains and one type of walls. We demonstrate with in situ synchrotron diffraction experiment that in a material, where the transition from the high-symmetry nonpolar phase to that antiferroelectric occurs via crossing an intermediate, once the transition is passed under a moderate electric field, the final antiferroelectric domain state can be fully controlled. A theoretical analysis shows that such a phenomenon can be explained in terms of biquadratic coupling between the polarization and antiferroelectric order parameter. This analysis also suggests that the electric-field control of the antiferroelectric state may be possible in a more general case where the intermediate ferroelectric state is absent. Anisotropy of lattice excitations in the intermediate polar phase under electric field is uncovered by an inelastic x-ray scattering experiment, which indicates that lattice instability is a driving force of transformation towards antiferroelectric phase despite of a strong first character of the transition.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 16 November 2020
  • Revised 21 March 2021
  • Accepted 20 May 2021

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.103.214108

©2021 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Condensed Matter, Materials & Applied Physics

Authors & Affiliations

S. B. Vakhrushev*, D. Andronikova, Iu. Bronwald, and E. Yu. Koroleva

  • Ioffe Phys.-Tech. Institute, 26 Politekhnicheskaya, St.-Petersburg 194021, Russia and Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, Polytechnicheskaya 29, St.-Petersburg 195251, Russia

D. Chernyshov

  • Swiss-Norwegian Beamlines at ESRF, BP 220, F-38043 Grenoble Cedex, France and Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, Polytechnicheskaya 29, St.-Petersburg 195251, Russia

A. V. Filimonov, S. A. Udovenko, and A. I. Rudskoy

  • Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, Polytechnicheskaya 29, St.-Petersburg 195251, Russia

D. Ishikawa and A. Q. R. Baron

  • Materials Dynamics Laboratory, RIKEN SPring-8 Center, 1-1-1 Kouto, Sayo, Hyogo 679-5148, Japan

A. Bosak

  • European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, BP 220, F-38043 Grenoble Cedex, France

I. N. Leontiev

  • Southern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don 344006, Russia

Alexander K. Tagantsev

  • Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), School of Engineering, Institute of Materials Science, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland and Ioffe Phys.-Tech. Institute, 26 Politekhnicheskaya, St.-Petersburg 194021, Russia

  • *s.vakhrushev@mail.ioffe.ru

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

Supplemental Material (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 103, Iss. 21 — 1 June 2021

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×