Reply to “Comment on ‘Past of a quantum particle’ ”

L. Vaidman
Phys. Rev. A 88, 046103 – Published 29 October 2013

Abstract

Misinterpretation in the preceding Comment of my recent analysis of the past of a photon is corrected. There is nothing in this analysis which is “contrary to the usual quantum expectations” but, nevertheless, it does provide “further understanding and interpretation of the system considered.” In particular, it indicates that the common sense argument used in the Comment should be abandoned.

  • Received 16 August 2013

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.88.046103

©2013 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

L. Vaidman

  • Raymond and Beverly Sackler School of Physics and Astronomy, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv 69978, Israel

Comments & Replies

Comment on “Past of a quantum particle”

Zheng-Hong Li, M. Al-Amri, and M. Suhail Zubairy
Phys. Rev. A 88, 046102 (2013)

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

Original Article

Past of a quantum particle

L. Vaidman
Phys. Rev. A 87, 052104 (2013)

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 88, Iss. 4 — October 2013

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review A

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×