One- and two-K-shell vacancy production in atomic Li by 95-MeV/u Ar18+ projectiles

J. A. Tanis, J.-Y. Chesnel, F. Frémont, D. Hennecart, X. Husson, D. Lecler, A. Cassimi, J. P. Grandin, J. Rangama, B. Skogvall, B. Sulik, J.-H. Bremer, and N. Stolterfoht
Phys. Rev. A 62, 032715 – Published 17 August 2000
PDFExport Citation

Abstract

Singly and doubly K-shell-vacant states in atomic Li, produced by 95-MeV/u Ar18+ projectiles, have been investigated. At this high velocity, excitation and ionization are expected to be well described by perturbation theories. High-resolution spectra for Auger electron emission, occurring in the energy range ∼50–90 eV and resulting from the deexcitation of singly or doubly excited states, were measured for various electron emission angles. Both single-K-shell excitation and double-K-shell vacancy production show strong dependences on the electron emission angle. Experimental anisotropy parameters for the 2P states resulting from single-K-shell excitation are in good agreement with predictions of the Born approximation. In the case of double-K-shell-vacancy (i.e., hollow atom) production, the two K vacancies are found to come about mainly by ionization plus excitation of the atomic Li target giving rise to excited states in Li+. Strong line intensities from the 2s21S and 2s3s3S excited-state configurations are explained in terms of shake processes, providing direct spectral identification for the electron-electron (e-e) interaction in producing the doubly vacant K-shell configurations. Production of the 2s3s3S state, which has an intensity greater than that of the 2s21S state, is attributed to a three-electron transition involving two shake transitions. Production of the 2s2p3P state has a large contribution from the dielectronic manifestation of the e-e interaction resulting from slow electron emission.

  • Received 3 April 2000

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.62.032715

©2000 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

J. A. Tanis1,2, J.-Y. Chesnel1,3, F. Frémont3, D. Hennecart3, X. Husson3, D. Lecler3, A. Cassimi3, J. P. Grandin3, J. Rangama3, B. Skogvall4, B. Sulik5, J.-H. Bremer1, and N. Stolterfoht1

  • 1Hahn-Meitner-Institut Berlin GmbH, Bereich Strukturforschung, D-14109 Berlin, Germany
  • 2Department of Physics, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, Michigan 49008
  • 3Centre Interdisciplinaire de Recherche Ions Lasers, Unité Mixte CEA-CNRS-ISMRA et Université de Caen, F-14050 Caen Cedex, France
  • 4Technische Universität Berlin, Hardenbergstraße 36, D-10623 Berlin, Germany
  • 5Institute of Nuclear Research (ATOMKI), H-4001 Debrecen, Hungary

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 62, Iss. 3 — September 2000

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review A

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×