Polysynaptic Potentiation at Different Levels of Rat Olfactory Pathways Following Learning

  1. Anne Marie Mouly1 and
  2. Rémi Gervais
  1. Institut des Sciences Cognitives, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 5015, 69675 Bron Cédex, France

Abstract

This study was aimed at investigating the consequences of learning on late polysynaptic components of evoked field potential signals recorded in parallel at different levels of the olfactory pathways. For this, evoked field potentials induced by electrical stimulation of the olfactory bulb were recorded simultaneously in the anterior piriform cortex, the posterior piriform cortex, the lateral entorhinal cortex, and the dentate gyrus. The different parameters of late components were measured in each site before and after completion of associative learning in anesthetized rats. In the learning task, rats were trained to associate electrical stimulation of one olfactory bulb electrode with the delivery of sucrose (positive reward) and stimulation of a second olfactory bulb electrode with the delivery of quinine (negative reward). In this way, stimulation of the same olfactory bulb electrodes used for inducing field potentials served as a discriminative cue in the learning paradigm. The data confirmed previous observation that learning was associated with a lowering in late-component-1 intensity of induction in the posterior piriform cortex. The use of simultaneous recording allowed us to further specify the consequences of learning on late-component distribution in the studied network. Indeed the data showed that whereas before learning, late component 1 was rather uniformly distributed among the recorded sites; following learning, its expression was facilitated preferentially in the posterior piriform cortex and lateral entorhinal cortex. Furthermore, learning was accompanied by the emergence of a new late component (late component 2), which occurred simultaneously in the four recording sites. The possible involvement of potentiation of polysynaptic components in recognition and/or consolidation processes will be discussed.

Footnotes

  • 1 Corresponding author.

  • E-MAIL mouly{at}isc.cnrs.fr; FAX (33) 043-7911210.

  • Article and publication are at http://www.learnmem.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/lm.45602

    • Received November 26, 2001.
    • Accepted March 19, 2002.
| Table of Contents