1887

Abstract

Nonulosonic acids (NulOs) are a group of nine-carbon monosaccharides with different functions in nature. -acetylneuraminic acid (Neu5Ac) is the most common NulO. It covers the membrane surface of all human cells and is a central molecule in the process of self-recognition via SIGLECS receptors. Some pathogenic bacteria escape the immune system by copying the sialylation of the host cell membrane. Neu5Ac production in these bacteria is catalysed by the enzyme NeuB. Some bacteria can also produce other NulOs named pseudaminic and legionaminic acids, through the NeuB homologues PseI and LegI, respectively. In Opisthokonta eukaryotes, the biosynthesis of Neu5Ac is catalysed by the enzyme NanS. In this study, we used publicly available data of sequences of NulOs synthases to investigate its distribution within the three domains of life and its relationship with pathogenic bacteria. We mined the KEGG database and found 425 NeuB sequences. Most NeuB sequences (58.74 %) from the KEGG orthology database were classified as from environmental bacteria; however, sequences from pathogenic bacteria showed higher conservation and prevalence of a specific domain named SAF. Using the HMM profile we identified 13 941 NulO synthase sequences in UniProt. Phylogenetic analysis of these sequences showed that the synthases were divided into three main groups that can be related to the lifestyle of these bacteria: (I) predominantly environmental, (II) intermediate and (III) predominantly pathogenic. NeuB was widely distributed in the groups. However, LegI and PseI were more concentrated in groups II and III, respectively. We also found that PseI appeared later in the evolutionary process, derived from NeuB. We use this same methodology to retrieve sialic acid synthase sequences from Archaea and Eukarya. A large-scale phylogenetic analysis showed that while the Archaea sequences are spread across the tree, the eukaryotic NanS sequences were grouped in a specific branch in group II. None of the bacterial NanS sequences grouped with the eukaryotic branch. The analysis of conserved residues showed that the synthases of Archaea and Eukarya present a mutation in one of the three catalytic residues, an E134D change, related to a reference sequence. We also found that the conservation profile is higher between NeuB of pathogenic bacteria and NanS of eukaryotes than between NeuB of environmental bacteria and NanS of eukaryotes. Our large-scale analysis brings new perspectives on the evolution of NulOs synthases, suggesting their presence in the last common universal ancestor.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (Award 424410/2018-4)
    • Principle Award Recipient: HelissonFaoro
  • Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Award VPPCB-07-FIO-18-2-38)
    • Principle Award Recipient: HelissonFaoro
  • This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial License.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.000563
2021-04-13
2024-04-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/mgen/7/4/mgen000563.html?itemId=/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.000563&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Schauer R. Sialic acids as regulators of molecular and cellular interactions. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2009; 19:507–514 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Li Y, Chen X. Sialic acid metabolism and sialyltransferases: natural functions and applications. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2012; 94:887–905 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. MacAuley MS, Crocker PR, Paulson JC. Siglec-mediated regulation of immune cell function in disease. Nat Rev Immunol 2014; 14:653–666 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Chou HH, Takematsu H, Diaz S, Iber J, Nickerson E et al. A mutation in human CMP-sialic acid hydroxylase occurred after the Homo-Pan divergence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998; 95:11751–11756 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Khan N, de Manuel M, Peyregne S, Do R, Prufer K et al. Multiple genomic events altering hominin siglec biology and innate immunity predated the common ancestor of humans and archaic hominins. Genome Biol Evol 2020; 12:1040–1050 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Nakata D, Close BE, Colley KJ, Matsuda T, Kitajima K. Molecular cloning and expression of the mouse N-acetylneuraminic acid 9-phosphate synthase which does not have deaminoneuraminic acid (KDN) 9-phosphate synthase activity. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2000; 273:642–648 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Crocker PR, Paulson JC, Varki A. Siglecs and their roles in the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol 2007; 7:255–266 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Varki A, Angata T. Siglecs—the major subfamily of I-type lectins. Glycobiology 2006; 16:1R–27 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Severi E, Hood DW, Thomas GH. Sialic acid utilization by bacterial pathogens. Microbiology 2007; 153:2817–2822 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Uchiyama S, Carlin AF, Khosravi A, Weiman S, Banerjee A et al. The surface-anchored nana protein promotes pneumococcal brain endothelial cell invasion. J Exp Med 2009; 206:1845–1852 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Ercoli G, Fernandes VE, Chung WY, Wanford JJ, Thomson S et al. Intracellular replication of Streptococcus pneumoniae inside splenic macrophages serves as a reservoir for septicaemia. Nat Microbiol 2018; 3:600–610 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Tanner ME. The enzymes of sialic acid biosynthesis. Bioorg Chem 2005; 33:216–228 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Chou WK, Dick S, Wakarchuk WW, Tanner ME. Identification and characterization of NeuB3 from Campylobacter jejuni as a pseudaminic acid synthase. J Biol Chem 2005; 280:35922–35928 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Feng Y, Cao M, Shi J, Zhang H, Hu D et al. Attenuation of Streptococcus suis virulence by the alteration of bacterial surface architecture. Sci Rep 2012; 2:1–9 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Hassan MI, Lundgren BR, Chaumun M, Whitfield DM, Clark B et al. Total biosynthesis of legionaminic acid, a bacterial sialic acid analogue. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2016; 55:12018–12021 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Schoenhofen IC, McNally DJ, Brisson JR, Logan SM. Elucidation of the CMP-pseudaminic acid pathway in Helicobacter pylori: synthesis from UDP-N-acetylglucosamine by a single enzymatic reaction. Glycobiology 2006; 16:8–14 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Stephenson HN, Mills DC, Jones H, Milioris E, Copland A et al. Pseudaminic acid on Campylobacter jejuni flagella modulates dendritic cell IL-10 expression via Siglec-10 receptor: a novel flagellin-host interaction. J Infect Dis 2014; 210:1487–1498 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Cotton TR, Joseph DDA, Jiao W, Parker EJ. Probing the determinants of phosphorylated sugar-substrate binding for human sialic acid synthase. Biochim Biophys Acta 2014; 1844:2257–2264 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Gunawan J, Simard D, Gilbert M, Lovering AL, Wakarchuk WW et al. Structural and mechanistic analysis of sialic acid synthase NeuB from Neisseria meningitidis in complex with Mn2+, phosphoenolpyruvate, and N-acetylmannosaminitol. J Biol Chem 2005; 280:3555–3563 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Davies PL, Baardsnes J, Kuiper MJ, Walker VK et al. Structure and function of antifreeze proteins. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 357 2002 pp 927–935 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Varki A. Colloquium paper: uniquely human evolution of sialic acid genetics and biology. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010; 107:8939–8946 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Zeleny R, Kolarich D, Strasser R, Altmann F. Sialic acid concentrations in plants are in the range of inadvertent contamination. Planta 2006; 224:222–227 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Lewis AL, Desa N, Hansen EE, Knirel YA, Gordon JI et al. Innovations in host and microbial sialic acid biosynthesis revealed by phylogenomic prediction of nonulosonic acid structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009; 106:13552–13557 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Kanehisa M, Sato Y, Kawashima M, Furumichi M, Tanabe M. KEGG as a reference resource for gene and protein annotation. Nucleic Acids Res 2016; 44:D457–D462 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Mukherjee S, Stamatis D, Bertsch J, Ovchinnikova G, Verezemska O et al. Genomes online database (gold) v.6: data updates and feature enhancements. Nucleic Acids Res 2017; 45:D446–D456 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Wattam AR, Abraham D, Dalay O, Disz TL, Driscoll T et al. PATRIC, the bacterial bioinformatics database and analysis resource. Nucleic Acids Res 2014; 42:D581–D591 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Marchler-Bauer A, Bo Y, Han L, He J, Lanczycki CJ et al. CDD/SPARCLE: functional classification of proteins via subfamily domain architectures. Nucleic Acids Res 2017; 45:D200–D203 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Finn RD, Coggill P, Eberhardt RY, Eddy SR, Mistry J et al. The Pfam protein families database: towards a more sustainable future. Nucleic Acids Res 2016; 44:D279–D285 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Katoh K, Standley DM. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol 2013; 30:772–780 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Capella-Gutiérrez S, Silla-Martínez JM, Gabaldón T. trimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 2009; 25:1972–1973 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Nguyen LT, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol 2015; 32:268–274 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Stamatakis A. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 2006; 22:2688–2690 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive tree of life (iTOL) V3: an online tool for the display and annotation of phylogenetic and other trees. Nucleic Acids Res 2016; 44:W242–W245 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Rice P, Longden I, Bleasby A. EMBOSS: the European molecular biology open software suite. Trends Genet 2000; 16:276–277 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Finn RD, Clements J, Arndt W, Miller BL, Wheeler TJ et al. HMMER web server: 2015 update. Nucleic Acids Res 2015; 43:W30–W38 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Bateman A, Martin MJ, O’Donovan C, Magrane M, Alpi E et al. UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res 2017; 45:D158–169 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Finn RD, Attwood TK, Babbitt PC, Bateman A, Bork P et al. InterPro in 2017-beyond protein family and domain annotations. Nucleic Acids Res 2017; 45:D190–D199 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. De Pierri CR, Voyceik R, Santos de Mattos LGC, Kulik MG, Camargo JO et al. Sweep: representing large biological sequences datasets in compact vectors. Sci Rep 2020; 10:1–10 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Stringer SC, Carter AT, Webb MD, Wachnicka E, Crossman LC et al. Genomic and physiological variability within group II (non-proteolytic) Clostridium botulinum . BMC Genomics 2013; 14:333–18 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Bignell DRD, Selpke RF, Huguet-Tapla JC, Chambers AH, Parry RJ et al. Streptomyces scabies 87-22 contains a coronafacic acid-like biosynthetic cluster that contributes to plant-microbe interactions. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 2010; 23:161–175 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Joseph DDA, Jiao W, Parker EJ. Arg314 is essential for catalysis by N-acetyl neuraminic acid synthase from Neisseria meningitidis. Biochemistry 2013; 52:2609–2619 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Wallace L, Daugherty SC, Nagaraj S, Johnson JK, Harris AD et al. Use of comparative genomics to characterize the diversity of Acinetobacter baumannii surveillance isolates in a health care institution. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2016; 60:5933–5941 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Vallenet D, Nordmann P, Barbe V, Poirel L, Mangenot S et al. Comparative analysis of acinetobacters: three genomes for three lifestyles. PLoS One 2008; 3:e1805 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  44. García García MI, Lau K, Von Itzstein M, García Carmona F, Sánchez Ferrer Álvaro. Molecular characterization of a new N-acetylneuraminate synthase (NeuB1) from Idiomarina loihiensis. Glycobiology 2015; 25:115–123 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Iyer LM, Aravind L. The emergence of catalytic and structural diversity within the beta-clip fold. Proteins 2004; 55:977–991 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Nee S. Antagonistic co-evolution and the evolution of genotypic randomization. J Theor Biol 1989; 140:499–518 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Li G-W. How do bacteria tune translation efficiency?. Curr Opin Microbiol 2015; 24:66–71 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Taylor RC, Webb Robertson BJM, Markillie LM, Serres MH, Linggi BE et al. Changes in translational efficiency is a dominant regulatory mechanism in the environmental response of bacteria. Integr Biol 2013; 5:1393–1406 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Albalat R, Cañestro C. Evolution by gene loss. Nat Rev Genet 2016; 17:379–391 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Boyd EF. Structural and biosynthetic diversity of Nonulosonic acids (NulOs) that Decorate surface structures in bacteria. Trends Microbiol 1867; 2020:1–16
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Petit D, Teppa E, Cenci U, Ball S, Harduin-Lepers A. Reconstruction of the sialylation pathway in the ancestor of eukaryotes. Sci Rep 2018; 8:1–13 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.000563
Loading
/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.000563
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error