1887

Abstract

Two non-pigmented strains in the genus , MWU14-2602 and MWU13-2610, were isolated from wild cranberry bogs in the Cape Cod National Seashore, USA. The isolates were characterized by genomic and phenotypic analyses, the results of which indicated that they represent two novel species. Based on total genome sequences, the closest relatives were in the group, which includes the recently described . Whole genome sequences were compared by genome distance phylogeny, digital DNA–DNA hybridization and average nucleotide identity analyses with each other and with the type strains of their nearest species. MWU14-2602 and MWU13-2610 fell well below the accepted cutoff values for species relatedness, clearly indicating that they represent novel species. Although little is known about these organisms , under laboratory conditions, MWU13-2610 produced a modest amount of HCN and was strongly positive for exoprotease activity, whereas MWU14-2602 did not produce HCN or exoproteases. The predominant fatty acids for both isolates were summed Cω7/Cω6. Both isolates produced siderophores and pyomelanin pigment on rich media, and neither was haemolytic on sheep blood agar. We propose the names sp. nov. (type strain MWU14-2602=ATCC TSD 260=CCOS 1979) and sp. nov. (type strain MWU13-2610=ATCC TSD-259=CCOS 1981) for these taxa.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • College of Health Sciences, Midwestern University
    • Principle Award Recipient: KoryO'Hara-Hanley
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005410
2022-06-14
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. O’Hara-Hanley K, Harrison A, Soby S. Chromobacterium alticapitis sp. nov. and chromobacterium sinusclupearum sp. nov. isolated from wild cranberry bogs in the cape cod national seashore, USA Figshare 2022 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Farrar RR, Gundersen-Rindal DE, Kuhar D, Blackburn MB. Insecticidal activity of Chromobacterium phragmitis, a recently described bacterium from tidal marshes. J Entomol Sci 2020; 55:98 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Ebadzadsahrai G, Higgins Keppler EA, Soby SD, Bean HD. Inhibition of fungal growth and induction of a novel volatilome in response to Chromobacterium vaccinii volatile organic compounds. Front Microbiol 2020; 11:1035 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Caragata EP, Otero LM, Carlson JS, Borhani Dizaji N, Dimopoulos G. A nonlive preparation of Chromobacterium sp. panama (Csp_P) is a highly effective larval mosquito biopesticide. Appl Environ Microbiol 2020; 86:e00240-20 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Saraiva RG, Huitt-Roehl CR, Tripathi A, Cheng Y-Q, Bosch J et al. Chromobacterium spp. mediate their anti-Plasmodium activity through secretion of the histone deacetylase inhibitor romidepsin. Sci Rep 2018; 8:6176 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Saraiva RG, Fang J, Kang S, Angleró-Rodríguez YI, Dong Y et al. Aminopeptidase secreted by Chromobacterium sp. Panama inhibits dengue virus infection by degrading the E protein. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2018; 12:e0006443 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Sampson K, Zaitseva J, Stauffer M, Vande Berg B, Guo R et al. Discovery of a novel insecticidal protein from Chromobacterium piscinae, with activity against Western Corn Rootworm, Diabrotica virgifera virgifera. J Invertebr Pathol 2017; 142:34–43 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Durán M, Faljoni-Alario A, Durán N. Chromobacterium violaceum and its important metabolites–review. Folia Microbiol 2010; 55:535–547 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Lopes SCP, Blanco YC, Justo GZ, Nogueira PA, Rodrigues FLS et al. Violacein extracted from Chromobacterium violaceum inhibits Plasmodium growth in vitro and in vivo . Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2009; 53:2149–2152 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Martin PAW, Blackburn M. Characterization of the insecticidal activity of Chromobacterium subtsugae . Biopestic, Int 2008; 4:102–109
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Durán N, Justo GZ, Durán M, Brocchi M, Cordi L et al. Advances in chromobacterium violaceum and properties of violacein-Its main secondary metabolite: a review. Biotechnol Adv 2016; 34:1030–1045 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Han XY, Han FS, Segal J. Chromobacterium haemolyticum sp. nov., a strongly haemolytic species. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2008; 58:1398–1403 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Young C-C, Arun AB, Lai W-A, Chen W-M, Chou J-H et al. Chromobacterium aquaticum sp. nov., isolated from spring water samples. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2008; 58:877–880 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Ponnusamy K, Jose S, Savarimuthu I, Michael GP, Redenbach M. Genetic diversity study of Chromobacterium violaceum isolated from Kolli Hills by amplified ribosomal DNA restriction analysis (ARDRA) and random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD). Lett Appl Microbiol 2011; 53:341–349 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Dall’Agnol LT, Martins RN, Vallinoto ACR, Ribeiro KTS. Diversity of Chromobacterium violaceum isolates from aquatic environments of state of Pará, Brazilian Amazon. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 2008; 103:678–682 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Lima-Bittencourt CI, Astolfi-Filho S, Chartone-Souza E, Santos FR, Nascimento AMA. Analysis of Chromobacterium sp. natural isolates from different Brazilian ecosystems. BMC Microbiol 2007; 7:58 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Martin PAW, Gundersen-Rindal D, Blackburn M, Buyer J. Chromobacterium subtsugae sp. nov., a betaproteobacterium toxic to Colorado potato beetle and other insect pests. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:993–999 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Kämpfer P, Busse H-J, Scholz HC. Chromobacterium piscinae sp. nov. and Chromobacterium pseudoviolaceum sp. nov., from environmental samples. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009; 59:2486–2490 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Soby SD, Gadagkar SR, Contreras C, Caruso FL. Chromobacterium vaccinii sp. nov., isolated from native and cultivated cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon Ait.) bogs and irrigation ponds. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2013; 63:1840–1846 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Ramirez JL, Short SM, Bahia AC, Saraiva RG, Dong Y et al. Chromobacterium Csp_P reduces malaria and dengue infection in vector mosquitoes and has entomopathogenic and in vitro anti-pathogen activities. PLoS Pathog 2014; 10:10 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Menezes CBA, Tonin MF, Corrêa DBA, Parma M, de Melo IS et al. Chromobacterium amazonense sp. nov. isolated from water samples from the Rio Negro, Amazon, Brazil. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2015; 107:1057–1063 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Zhou S, Guo X, Wang H, Kong D, Wang Y et al. Chromobacterium rhizoryzae sp. nov., isolated from rice roots. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:3890–3896 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Bajaj A, Kumar A, Yadav S, Kaur G, Bala M et al. Isolation and characterization of a novel Gram-negative bacterium Chromobacterium alkanivorans sp. nov., strain IITR-71T degrading halogenated alkanes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:5228–5235 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Blackburn MB, Farrar RR, Sparks ME, Kuhar D, Mitchell A et al. Chromobacterium sphagni sp. nov., an insecticidal bacterium isolated from Sphagnum bogs. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:3417–3422 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Blackburn MB, Farrar RR Jr, Sparks ME, Kuhar D, Mowery JD et al. Chromobacterium phragmitis sp. nov., isolated from estuarine marshes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:2681–2686 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Blackburn MB, Farrar RR Jr, Sparks ME, Kuhar D, Mowery JD et al. Chromobacterium paludis sp. nov., a novel bacterium isolated from a Chesapeake Bay marsh. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:6142–6146 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Eck P. The American Cranberry Rutgers University Press; 1990
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Ebadzadsahrai G, Soby S. 16S rRNA amplicon profiling of cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon Ait.) flower and berry surfaces. Microbiol Resour Announc 2019; 8:e01479-18 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. O’Hara-Hanley K, Harrison A, Soby SD. Draft genomic sequences of Chromobacterium sp. nov. strains MWU13-2610 and MWU14-2602, Isolated from Wild Cranberry Bogs in Massachusetts. Genome Announc 2018; 6:e00332-18 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Vöing K, Harrison A, Soby SD. Draft genome sequence of Chromobacterium subtsugae MWU12-2387 isolated from a Wild Cranberry Bog in Truro, Massachusetts. Genome Announc 2017; 5:e01633-16 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Vöing K, Harrison A, Soby SD. Draft genome sequence of chromobacterium vaccinii, a potential biocontrol agent against mosquito (Aedes aegypti) Larvae. Genome Announc 2015; 3:e00477-15 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Ebadzadsahrai G, Thomson J, Soby S. Draft genome sequence of Pseudomonas sp. strain MWU13-2860, isolated from a wild cranberry bog in Truro, Massachusetts. Microbiol Resour Announc 2018; 7:13 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Ebadzadsahrai G, Thomson J, Soby S. Draft genome sequence of Pseudomonas sp. strain MWU12-2534b, isolated from a wild cranberry bog in Truro, Massachusetts. Microbiol Resour Announc 2018; 7:13 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Ebadzadsahrai G, Thomson J, Soby S. Draft genome sequences of Pseudomonas MWU13-2625 and MWU12-2115, isolated from a wild cranberry bog at the cape cod national seashore. Microbiol Resour Announc 2018; 7:12 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Ebadzadsahrai G, Soby S. Draft genome sequence of Aquitalea sp. strain MWU14-2217, isolated from a wild cranberry bog in Provincetown, Massachusetts. Microbiol Resour Announc 2018; 7:21 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Wattam AR, Davis JJ, Assaf R, Boisvert S, Brettin T et al. Improvements to PATRIC, the all-bacterial Bioinformatics Database and Analysis Resource Center. Nucleic Acids Res 2017; 45:D535–D542 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Stamatakis A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 2014; 30:1312–1313 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M. TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy. Nat Commun 2019; 10:2182 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Lefort V, Desper R, Gascuel O. FastME 2.0: a comprehensive, accurate, and fast distance-based phylogeny inference program. Mol Biol Evol 2015; 32:2798–2800 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R, Oliver Glöckner F, Peplies J. JSpeciesWS: a web server for prokaryotic species circumscription based on pairwise genome comparison. Bioinformatics 2016; 32:929–931 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Yoon SH, Ha SM, Lim J, Kwon S, Chun J. A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2017; 110:1281–1286 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Lee I, Ouk Kim Y, Park SC, Chun J. OrthoANI: An improved algorithm and software for calculating average nucleotide identity. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:1100–1103 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:60 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Arahal DR. Chapter 6: Whole-genome analyses: average nucleotide identity. In Goodfellow M, Sutcliffe I, Chun J. eds Methods in Microbiology Academic Press; 2014 pp 103–122
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Auch AF, von Jan M, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Digital DNA-DNA hybridization for microbial species delineation by means of genome-to-genome sequence comparison. Stand Genomic Sci 2010; 2:117–134 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Brettin T, Davis JJ, Disz T, Edwards RA, Gerdes S et al. RASTtk: a modular and extensible implementation of the RAST algorithm for building custom annotation pipelines and annotating batches of genomes. Sci Rep 2015; 5:8365 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Zhou Y, Liang Y, Lynch KH, Dennis JJ, Wishart DS. PHAST: A fast phage search tool. Nucleic Acids Res 2011; 39:W347–52 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Elnashar M. Properties and Function of Pyomelanin Biopolymers: Sciyo; 2010
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Balibar CJ, Walsh CT. In vitro biosynthesis of violacein from L-tryptophan by the enzymes VioA-E from Chromobacterium violaceum . Biochemistry 2006; 45:15444–15457 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Miller JH. Experiments in Molecular Genetics Cold Spring Harbor (N.Y): Cold Spring Harbor laboratory; 1972
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Zlosnik JEA, Williams HD. Methods for assaying cyanide in bacterial culture supernatant. Lett Appl Microbiol 2004; 38:360–365 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Harrison AM, Soby SD. Reclassification of Chromobacterium violaceum ATCC 31532 and its quorum biosensor mutant CV026 to Chromobacterium subtsugae . AMB Express 2020; 10:202 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  53. McClean KH, Winson MK, Fish L, Taylor A, Chhabra SR et al. Quorum sensing and Chromobacterium violaceum: exploitation of violacein production and inhibition for the detection of N-acylhomoserine lactones. Microbiology 1997; 143:3703–3711 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Louden BC, Haarmann D, Lynne AM. Use of blue agar CAS assay for siderophore detection. J Microbiol Biol Educ 2011; 12:51–53 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Rozewicki J, Li S, Amada KM, Standley DM, Katoh K. MAFFT-DASH: integrated protein sequence and structural alignment. Nucleic Acids Res 2019; 47:W5–W10 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005410
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005410
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error